Quote:
Quote:
I’ve always wondered this about women who learn PU. Do you study it only to understand the social dynamics behind being picked up? Or do you actively use it on men, like we use it on women? Because I would think that, since men are wired psychologically different, that a lot of PU wouldn’t work in reverse. I don’t mean to offend you or anything, it just really intrigues me that women might be out there using openers and dhv-ing and stuff.
We often say that women do this stuff naturally, so that just means there are more Naturals among the female population, but there's no reason they can't learn to do it just like men can. We're really not as different as you'd think at first. I've recently started teaching a few women privately and they've been able to apply what I've taught them just as successfully as a man would; perhaps even more effectively, as men are more repective and so they mostly just need fine tuning, rather than dramatic changes.
Oh Kalel...you have no idea how well this works on men

Rye is right. A lot of this stuff comes naturally to women. I basically used a lot of this stuff before I knew about pu, but now I just know the terms for things. Women don't have to use a lot of pu techniques like men do...actually some of them are counterprodictive. For instance, negging and not qualifying doesn't work too well. But push-pull works and kino is wonderful! But basically, women are more natural when it comes to pu (with some exceptions of course) but it is more fine tuning.
The reason I am intersted is because of the psychology behind it. Also, society tells us that men are to approach women, not the other way around. With this out-dated thought, women have to settle for the best guy out of the group of men that approach her. But what if there is a different guy that would have been better for her, but she didn't meet him bc he was too shy to approach? It isn't fair that women should settle so this helps women take control of their own love life.