Quote:
Quote:
The war isn't just about gender, although there probably is a culture war. When my company laid me off in 2008, within 18 months they had hired a hot blonde to fill my old role.
Too tired for a full response but found this point interesting. You say "within 18 months" as if that's not a long time to fill a job. That's a year and a half. If you had said a week later I could understand. Then you say she was a hot blonde...I don't see how that proves anything. Do you know if she was under qualified. Aren't you assuming that because she was hot she was not qualified? If not I dont get how you connected the points. That's like saying, I'm ugly, my girl broke up with me and 2 years later she was with a good looking guy...so looks are a factor in all this. By referencing this example, aren't you just one of those bo-hooing guys.
Also, your other pt about the floozy who gets promoted, tbh, it's not really found in corporate america. You refernce the bar scene which is different entirely. Yes, in the bar scene, modelling, tv, hotter girls win but these are industries based on looks. Their nature is to pick the most attractive people who can attract more customers. Once you get beyond lower management (like high school GED manager lower management), women are rarely promoted for high positions due to looks or fucking. That's a myth and porno fantasy. Truth is, senior management who busted their ass to get somewhere, don't promote floozies for positions because if the dumb blonde fails, they themselves lose and get fired. Business men are about money first, they may put someone in a secretary position, but they're not gonna put someone to run a team or manage a division off of some good head.
And can someone tell me how the manosphere is a pickup thing? If it's Men's rights let them discuss or complain about men's rights.
Easier to do it this way than to screw around with quote tags on my phone, so please excuse my failure to exert my technical prowess while I tear you to shreds:
1. Yes, a year and a half later, the company was in a position to refill a lot of the positions they laid off. Well they hired me in 2006, and next round had the same pool of candidates to choose from; maybe with a few variations (a few hot chicks added). They picked her and didn't call me back
2. The floozy who gets promoted. First off, WHO IN THE WORLD said anything about hiring and promotion based on sexual favors. In that job, I flew to New York, LA, and Dallas weekly. I was responsible for tens of $millions of dollars of partner business. My job was to engage the media partner and get them to get us more exposure. I was on track for making 6 figures on Richmond Va at 26 in 2008; not fuckin bad. Much of this came from marketing initiatives that would run forever and I'd get a handsome commission at each monthly occurrence (because I was making the company a shit load of money; why not just take what Rob built, and cut having to pay his commissions by cutting him?
I majored in a subject relevent to the business. The Hot blonde higher was an art history major. So as far as your argument about hot girls not being given a chance because they give good head, falls flat right there, because for one, this girl wasn't hired based on head-giving skill, nor on fucking skill,it was simply that she was a hot blonde and an art history major which made no fucking sense whatsoever, and they looked at the applicant pool, I obviously wasn't applied for my old job, and they went with the hot blonde.
Leading a team? Wholly accountable position? Position with lots of authority? This position had it all! Again tens of millions of dollars of business flow through this position, and I handled it superbly. It just so happened it after things started recovering a little bit they had a fresh applicant pool, and why not she is a pretty fresh young hot blonde face?
And your point about the MRA's being a pick up thing… You obviously have no clue about what this community is about, or what any of the interconnections are. The manosphere is an outgrowth of the PUA community, these are guys who decided that men are legally held back and are set up by the structures of society to be totally screwed over by women and treated unequally in every way shape and form.
But if you want real proof of why the MRA suddenly became a PUA thing, I'll tell you right now: RooshV.
His books and clips in YouTube posts are all about which cities suck for meeting women in, he's a sexual tourist and a proudly proclaimed men's rights activist, that's all he does, and it seems he also, and you may be able to get substantiation elsewhere in this forum as well, that he doesn't see the success that he claims, but he just goes about eastern European cities and writes about how Ukrainian girls are supposed to be hot and then writes about how they weren't after all, then no girls in Toronto are hot and then Rights Paola missing the girls in Poland must be. Then he writes, "girls in Poland suck!" Every city he visits is followed with a blog post: "Los Angeles, the worst city in the world to try to pick up women" although he is never been to any US city aside from DC and it's MD suburbs.
Want to teach guys the best cities for meeting women? Okay! Awesome! Well done bud, and I'll have your back. The only problem is he then footnotes all of this with this paranoid bullshit about women are taking over the world and men have no rights and every night, are dragged off to jail just for going up to a girl in the bar and saying "hey how's it going?"
His "pick up" part of the business if that's what you want to call it is totally merge with the "MRA" part of the his deal.
So when you say that you don't know how MRA became a PUA thing, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about!