Quote:
Another post compelled me to write this but have been thinking about it for a while.
Now this might sound stupid at first but hear me out.
Your pets are a lot like women and winning their favour is similar.
For example, patting. Pat your pet too much and they get bored with it and dont apprietate it, dont pat them enough the connection is lost and they look for others to pats elsewhere. Also there's good pats and bad pats, cats for example will pur on good pats but not bad pats. So the secret to patting is to do it sparingly but give quality pats when you do, and don't forget to sometimes deny pats even when they are asking for it. Walking dogs is similar, walk the dog too much it loses respect for walks, but when you do walk it take it for fun energetic walks.
Pets are also attracted to alpha humans. So you can test your alphaness, AMOGing others and your pets will give you an unbiased opinion on if its working.
Pets seem to also respond best if 80% you don't give a shit about them, and the 20% of the time you do comes at random times. Routine can be a good thing but it can also get boring, a mix of routine and random is the key.
So basically can practice AMOGing, push-pull, freeze outs, confidence, and just basic game-timing, all on your pets. Translate this to girls almost works the same way.
Well there may be something in what you are saying but not entirely. For example, i was able to tame my first cat who would always keep his distance from us by locking him in a room where he was helpless and demonstrating i was not out to harm him, somehow i do not see that working on a woman

, or for example dogs, yes dogs definitely react to alpha behavior, it is inborn in them to submit to the strongest wolf in a pack, but establishing your dominance is purely a physical thing with dogs, if he does no behave he gets hit with newspaper(it does not hurt but it gives him a warning) you wont go around hitting AMOGs with newspaper tough. So in essence, while there are some similarities what is different is level of complexity of this interactions.