Quote:
Oh I am laughing hysterically as I write this picturing you doing that mighty move and expecting the response of the gurls...
Quote:
ur direct approach may work only on a girl by herself,but putting aside the odds of a having a girl by herself which is extremely rare,the direct approach just sucks and it shows no value.
Quote:
Shyness and Confidence are not opposites..Yeah right..I wont go on discussing such a trivial matter,all i ask u is to stand in front of the mirror and try to match ur shyness look with that of confident posture and c how it works..
Quote:
But just as u confused ace of spades and made him check his vocabulary,I want u to lend me ur dictionary to c how ur new language works..And oh dont give me speech bout 'behind the enemy lines'ur words are so darn obvious and it speaks of unreality
Just some of your writing... Forgive me for what I'm about to do, but you're making an ass out of yourself.
1st: Improve your spelling dude, and by the way try capitalizing your *I*.
2nd: That 'mighty move' huh? You sure direct approach SUCKS on a Group set!? There is either one of two things here: You either never have seen how this works, which is SURPRISING because people who don't use indirect game ALSO happen to approach sets of 2 or more. This has been happening even before PUA arts were formed, (just in case you didn't know that) OR You have a complete wrong view of Direct Game (I'll give you a hint: Direct doesn't necesarily mean "You're fkin cute" all the time)
3rd: Shyness look? Since when is there a 'shyness look'?
4th: My words speak of unreality? Behind the 'enemy' lines? Um... enemy? Who in the Hell mentioned 'enemy' lines? Um... That's awesome! Errr... wrong... I said between lines.
Quote:
U obviously didnt read my post very well,I didnt tell him that his methods don work,I just told him that they are really not reliable and maybe work for him(lucky though) but for the majority I just DONT THINK it is gonna work and that is my sole opinion..
It's cool you have your opinion, but you still believe Direct approaches on sets of 2 or more don't work... That's ok too... You havent'seen much... Like I said earlier, I have used, still use, and seen others use Direct Approach on sets of 2 or more... I hope you have too... if no, you really need to go out more. How about you start a Thread "Does Direct Approach work on sets of 2 or more?"
Quote:
I am still Waiting for Romeo to demonstrate his direct approach on group theory to share with me some tactics that maybe i dont know(and i ain't kiddin here)
I don't have to demostrate or prove anything to you, him or anybody else if I don't feel like it. The only people I would ever have to prove to are my students. I don't need to share techniques with you.
[/quote]