Eye Contact?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Tools & Techniques of Game: Meeting, Attracting and Seducing Women » Approaching and Opening




Author Message
 Post subject: Eye Contact?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:54 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:30 am
Posts: 62
Ok so this probably happens to all of us, we see a HB and she either eye fucks us or does a quick gaze into your eyes.

Once you make eye contact, I was told to keep staring at her until she breaks.. So you don't look like a bitch. But Its sort of awkward and I feel like im starting her down..

Anyone have a good technique here? Should you wink, raise your eye browns?

Also, do you mention the staring when you approach? "I saw you checkin me out.., Etc"


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Eye Contact?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:27 pm
Posts: 183
Quote:
Ok so this probably happens to all of us, we see a HB and she either eye fucks us or does a quick gaze into your eyes.

Once you make eye contact, I was told to keep staring at her until she breaks.. So you don't look like a bitch. But Its sort of awkward and I feel like im starting her down..

Anyone have a good technique here? Should you wink, raise your eye browns?

Also, do you mention the staring when you approach? "I saw you checkin me out.., Etc"
Smile at her during the eye contact, so she knows that you aren't threatening her. Mentioning the eye contact would be a good move because it shows that you aren't shy about making a connection.

_________________
"Simple. Escalate, if she's into you, she will escalate with you, if not, you will know soon enough." - SexAddict911


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:51 am
Posts: 33
Location: 3rd rock from the sun.
DON'T break into a big grin. just a hint of a smile is enough to show that you are enjoying it but not flustered. do stare her down. the ones that play the staring game longest are the ones with spirit and the most fun to be with.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:27 pm
Posts: 183
Quote:
DON'T break into a big grin. just a hint of a smile is enough to show that you are enjoying it but not flustered. do stare her down. the ones that play the staring game longest are the ones with spirit and the most fun to be with.
This depends on whether we are speaking of day game or night game. I would be hesitant to stare anyone down while doing day game.

_________________
"Simple. Escalate, if she's into you, she will escalate with you, if not, you will know soon enough." - SexAddict911


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 5:03 am
Posts: 408
Website: http://solvemygirlproblems.com
My old philosophy was to act in accord with however I felt. I would stare down a girl, but once it got awkward, I would break eye contact assuming I had passed the subconscious Alpha assessment because I waited long enough.

My new philosophy is to hold it till she breaks it, no matter what. It's kind of simple. She's holding eye contact with you, which means as "awkward" as it gets for you, it should theoretically be getting just as awkward for her. Which means the two possibilities are:

(a) It's actually not getting awkward for her, in which case you can stare at her
(b) It IS getting awkward for her, but she's holding eye contact anyways. That means there's no reasonable "threat" in your willingness to mirror her stare. It's just a question of state control.

So long as you don't hold eye contact AFTER she's already broken it; there's nothing wrong with it.

Smiling too much / breaking eye contact or looking down submissively are both reflexes that function to reduce your level of threat projection. They were never selected out via evolution, even on women, because they increased chances of survival in a hyper competitive secksual market.

The difference between holding eye contact / breaking it correlates with the difference between Alpha/beta. As a beta, you want to reduce threat as much as possible because your chances of survival are increased the most by SEEKING APPROVAL from those people that threaten you. As an Alpha, your chances of survival are irrelevant as you're "capable" of surviving regardless of another's approval. Hence it becomes more a question of procuring reproductive proxies (submission from others, dominance, territory, etc); and so you want to MAXIMIZE threat projection rather than minimize it.

If you'll recall from the game, it's "survival of the smoothest" because we now live in a world where social adaptivity is the barometer to success, not physical adaptivity. So all this shit about threat projection gets translated to its socially fluid version, and comes out in much more subtle forms like eye contact, body language, and tone of voice

_________________
My Blog: www.solvemygirlproblems.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:49 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:27 pm
Posts: 183
Quote:
My old philosophy was to act in accord with however I felt. I would stare down a girl, but once it got awkward, I would break eye contact assuming I had passed the subconscious Alpha assessment because I waited long enough.

My new philosophy is to hold it till she breaks it, no matter what. It's kind of simple. She's holding eye contact with you, which means as "awkward" as it gets for you, it should theoretically be getting just as awkward for her. Which means the two possibilities are:

(a) It's actually not getting awkward for her, in which case you can stare at her
(b) It IS getting awkward for her, but she's holding eye contact anyways. That means there's no reasonable "threat" in your willingness to mirror her stare. It's just a question of state control.

So long as you don't hold eye contact AFTER she's already broken it; there's nothing wrong with it.

Smiling too much / breaking eye contact or looking down submissively are both reflexes that function to reduce your level of threat projection. They were never selected out via evolution, even on women, because they increased chances of survival in a hyper competitive secksual market.

The difference between holding eye contact / breaking it correlates with the difference between Alpha/beta. As a beta, you want to reduce threat as much as possible because your chances of survival are increased the most by SEEKING APPROVAL from those people that threaten you. As an Alpha, your chances of survival are irrelevant as you're "capable" of surviving regardless of another's approval. Hence it becomes more a question of procuring reproductive proxies (submission from others, dominance, territory, etc); and so you want to MAXIMIZE threat projection rather than minimize it.

If you'll recall from the game, it's "survival of the smoothest" because we now live in a world where social adaptivity is the barometer to success, not physical adaptivity. So all this shit about threat projection gets translated to its socially fluid version, and comes out in much more subtle forms like eye contact, body language, and tone of voice
I think I understand what you're getting at, but the logic of what you're saying is not fluid. Maximizing threat projection no matter what would make you the opposite of socially adaptive. This is the point where people take "being alpha" to a level of extremity that hinders their success in social situations. Giving off the air that you truly do not give a crap about anyone at all would maximize your threat projection, but it would horribly damage your game because it would push people away.

We don't go through the processes of comfort building and kino escalation just because they sound cool. We do these things because they make people feel closer to us by showing them we are not threats, so that they will comprehend that we are ideal partners for mutually beneficial relationships.

_________________
"Simple. Escalate, if she's into you, she will escalate with you, if not, you will know soon enough." - SexAddict911


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:49 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:18 pm
Posts: 2130
Website: http://www.thescienceofnaturalgame.com
Quote:
My old philosophy was to act in accord with however I felt. I would stare down a girl, but once it got awkward, I would break eye contact assuming I had passed the subconscious Alpha assessment because I waited long enough.

My new philosophy is to hold it till she breaks it, no matter what. It's kind of simple. She's holding eye contact with you, which means as "awkward" as it gets for you, it should theoretically be getting just as awkward for her. Which means the two possibilities are:

(a) It's actually not getting awkward for her, in which case you can stare at her
(b) It IS getting awkward for her, but she's holding eye contact anyways. That means there's no reasonable "threat" in your willingness to mirror her stare. It's just a question of state control.

So long as you don't hold eye contact AFTER she's already broken it; there's nothing wrong with it.

Smiling too much / breaking eye contact or looking down submissively are both reflexes that function to reduce your level of threat projection. They were never selected out via evolution, even on women, because they increased chances of survival in a hyper competitive secksual market.

The difference between holding eye contact / breaking it correlates with the difference between Alpha/beta. As a beta, you want to reduce threat as much as possible because your chances of survival are increased the most by SEEKING APPROVAL from those people that threaten you. As an Alpha, your chances of survival are irrelevant as you're "capable" of surviving regardless of another's approval. Hence it becomes more a question of procuring reproductive proxies (submission from others, dominance, territory, etc); and so you want to MAXIMIZE threat projection rather than minimize it.

If you'll recall from the game, it's "survival of the smoothest" because we now live in a world where social adaptivity is the barometer to success, not physical adaptivity. So all this shit about threat projection gets translated to its socially fluid version, and comes out in much more subtle forms like eye contact, body language, and tone of voice
Fantastic Effin post!

I too prefer to make eye contact until she breaks it. However, I tend to start with little flirting signals in body language.

I add a smile or smirk. When we get a smile we give a smile. A smile gives us a positive feeling(literally) if you consciously smile through some rough moments you will make yourself feel better.

Sometimes(most of the time really) I add a brow raise which seems to remind all of us of the great feeling we got as babies when our Mom raised her brows while smiling at us. It reminds us of that previous bond we had, more specifically it gives us a good feeling.

This gives her a positive reaction when she LOOKS at me, so she is initially attracted most of the time. That is my non-threatening form of body language I use while evoking a positive feeling, but I DO NOT LOOK AWAY, I maintain strong eye contact.

My goal is to grab attention(eye contact) get recognition(my flirting signals sent), those were Givens first two phases of courtship. Hopefully she gets the message and sends her interest back(I see it through approach cues).

The confidence I have is shown in how I hold my head, my shoulders, stance, presence really. My relaxed behavior, having fun, and comfort are traits of a "alpha" male(according to Robert Sapolsky). I am confident with nonthreatening behavior.

_________________
Just another guy from back in the day.

Blogging again living life: http://www.Scienceofnaturalgame.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:05 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:19 pm
Posts: 376
Location: florida
here's the problem, it may not work for a certain age group and those with certain looks. i have heard stories of girls getting bouncers to kick guys out because they would stare at them. is that worth having that happen?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 553
Quote:
here's the problem, it may not work for a certain age group and those with certain looks. i have heard stories of girls getting bouncers to kick guys out because they would stare at them. is that worth having that happen?
Keeping non threatening eye contact is not the same as staring at them.

but you must give at least some tiny smile or any other positive sign along. Completely neutral face while holding eye contact till she breaks it is strange, its like 2 men stare each other to see who is "stronger". And its not cool to do that with women. So you must add some clue that you are holding non threatening eye contact.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link