Quote:
Personal question
Are you privy to routine game or natural game, or maybe a little bit of both?
Also have you ever used ross jeffries material?
If I understand the question right, you're asking if I run my game naturally, or if I use "technology", canned openers, canned routines like the cube and such?
If that's what you're asking, then the answer is, I read the material, I figure out how it works, why it works, the underlying psychology of it (I'm planning on being a psychologist) and then instead of using canned stuff, I just incorporate things into my game that does similar stuff. Its not an exact science and I'm still working on becoming a true PUA, but this feels so much more natural to me and I don't feel silly by using the same routines and openers all tht time.
I am working on making some canned material of my own, for personal use when I can't think up something on the spot and I do like using opinion openers, but instead of using them as an opener, I make them into a routine, it makes much more sense if you look at it from a conversational standpoint. If some guy randomly walks up and asks your opinion, you are kinda confused and takes your brain a minute to really get into it. If he opens with something situation and puts you at ease and just acts like a nice guy, then asks you for your opinion while you're talking, then you feel much more comfortable giving it and you actually pay attention to the question more, so it hooks them better. Instead of wasting a good one to start the convo, make it a focal point.
I don't endorse Ross Jeffries at all. He is very talented, but I'm not willing to sacrifice my ethics in order to get women easier. I consider a lot of the techniques he uses, to be very similar to giving a girl GHB (the date rape drug). Think about it for a second and maybe you can see the similarities, but if not and you want to use it, great, I hope it works for you, I just can't give any advice on the subject unfortunately.
NLP on the other hand, is not Ross Jeffries material, it is what he has based his material on. Took me a little bit to accept this, because I was so putt off by what I read of him in The Game and didn't want to go that route, but NLP is very powerful like he says, but it can be used in perfectly ways that I find perfectly ethical. When phrasing things, you use terms that if examined would be called sexual innuendo, but because it is said so normally, it goes mostly unnoticed, aside from the subconscious picking it up and making them think you're daring and intriguing, but not knowing why exactly and that makes them even more interested. There are tons of applications of NLP that I am not only ok with, but that I incorporate into my game and that if I do end up making my own method and write a book or something, there will need to be a large portion dedicated to this.
Hope that answered all your questions, if not let me know.