Quote:
^Why not just focus on the tasks at hand? Why clutter the mind with so much bs? Better than, worse than, equal to, approach because of this, don't approach because of that, I will be this, I will be that. Really . . . is all of this necessary for a conversation?
There was probably a time when you were nervous about buying a slurpee at 7-11 because you were a 6 year old and you never mixed that crap together or ever made any cash purchases. Did you pump yourself up by telling yourself that you're better than a slurpee machine or the pimple faced kid working the register?
. . . Or did you observe some other people, go over the routine, and count your money? . . .
While I laughed and largely agree, most people didn't flat up walk to the slurpee machine as a 6-year-old and, with the utmost confidence, mix shit together and toss your money on the counter while you walk out.
As you said yourself, 'observe some other people' - but not all skills can be mastered in simple observation.
And unlike the slurpee machine, it's possible to fail here. Sure, we didn't pump ourselves up going "I GOT THIS, THERE ARE MANY SLURPEE MACHINES IN THE WORLD" - but did we need to? When was the last time you approached a slurpee machine and got "Fuck off?" And, if you did, you'd walk away thinking thoughts like "Whatever, man, I don't need you. I'm better than you. You're a fuckin' slurpee machine, man."
While I agree that sometimes a lot of this stuff seems convoluted - and being largely 'natural game' myself, I feel like a lot of this stuff seems complicated to think about and sometimes even harmful to incorporate... But at the same time, I see some elements of 'game' in my 'natural' approaches. For years I led girls on (only girls I already knew), and without any concept of 'negging' I was doing similar things, while I saw other guys (who, looking back, I think they had some 'game' knowledge) over-neg and I'd sit there thinking "He's just being offensive how doesn't he see it..?"
That said, sometimes it seems complicated and exhausting for no real point, when the end result is "Just talk to a girl and get her to like you" - we all have friends (who presumably like us) and we didn't need a manual, so?
But at the same time, I know a lot of it seems complicated/drawn-out because it's the 'intuitive' shit some guy was doing (A big 'natural game' original who actually took his thoughts, analyzed them logically, and tried to pass them off as a science when in fact it's just some experience-proven shit), and if you mastered your 'game' it'd be natural and not silly at all.
That all said, what you're bringing up almost sounds like part of the learning process. I've heard people say they're "better than their bicycle" to pump themselves up after falling down on their bike and thinking "I can't do it" (granted, little kids), and you hear people saying "You're better than [x]" all the time, to indicate "you have nothing to fear, just try and you've got this" - if nothing else, why can it not be that?
In certain cases, why can't that be the right solution? Not everyone is a jobless keyboard jock talking to a hot intern. Why can't it sometimes be that you're an awesome guy while a girl just says "Fuck off" without even giving you a chance to be friendly? And, in those cases, why is it wrong to shrug it off with "Whatever I don't need her" rather than letting it affect you?
You gave no context here. It isn't like some punk shit all over his own game and then the girl laughed in his face. In that case, he needs to better himself and not bitch. That's not always the case.