Tooothpick you're close... I'm going to really push you now.
Let's look at what you wrote again...
Quote:
Firstly, the act of explaining the koan is not egocentric in itself.
Oh really?
Quote:
If one already knows and understands the koan, the ego is validated and believes it is correct, as does mine.
??? So you ARE being egocentric?
Quote:
I merely seek to explain that the correct answer is irrelevant. A completely different purpose.
What makes you so SURE the answer is irrelevant??
If the correct answer is irrelevant how come you go on to give an explanation of what the monkey represents and what the boy represents. Surely, if the answer is irrelevant the question is also irrelevant???
Ever heard of the saying, "Garbage in equals garbage out."
If there is "Garbage out." And you are so SURE of this... After all the answer is irrelevant. Why do you have to explain the garbage in as being, "The monkey is the EGO... And the boy is..."
Why not just say the koan may as well read:
Q. jfdksla jfdksfjd eijfdksleijfls ???
A. fkldsk;el kfldskfleokfoe
Garbage in = Garbage out.
You could have stopped here you know... But why didn't you???
What... drove... you... to...try...and...explain...this?
What, what... what, three-letter word is it ____ ?
'_ _ _'
