Quote:
@Trixta-So the random looser should've stuck around and stalked the girl(s),opposed to rolling off and re-open later?
Try again Trixta.
Before trying to discourage the routine-try it!
And which women you know who isnt into or facinated by Astrology & ESP stuff?
And dont be an idiot Trixta:if one knows the policies of the bar/club,then he wont attempt to tap the bartender.
But that doesnt have to be done;you can simply chat to the bartender as though yall are acquiantance.
9 out of 10 times,he wont refuse to chat a bit since he's trying to sell drinks and get tips.
Trixta,this wont work for you because you're to blind to think that a community guy will let this girl re-open him to beg a drink later on.
I've never field tested this routine but I've field tested many like this,even canned stuff with great success.
All because I rolled off and walked away.
But it seems like Trixta prefers to hound the girls,peck them all night and be a bug.
Which girl would think a guys' weird for doing a routine then walking off like he doesnt care?
Perhaps the chiccs I'd done this to[walk away]and laid them at the end of the night.
So before you knock the routine-try it.
If not,come u with reasonable reasons why you think it wont work!!
You have a weak mentality & frame so this routine wont work for you.
@Blondguy-I repect all your posts.
In fact,I was 1st to nominate you and voted for you in the best-post of the month thingy;so much props.
But you have no point in saying,"because a routine hasnt been field tested it isnt worth..."
Total BS from you Blondguy!
If a routine or opener works 80% of the time for me(great ratio).
You can try it 10 time and it fails all 10 times.
Doent mean the routine isnt worth anything.
You're just not congruent with it.
I know this routine will work for me %100 of the time(eventhough havent tested) because it' not the routine(words)that count,it's what you do afterwards:you stay or leave to preserve value & intrigue to reopen later?
You cannot go wrong with this routine because you're not demanding anything from the girls!!
How can they reject you when you're not asking for anything(#'s,etc).
You're running the routine,then leave to continue gaming others,then re-open them,or they will re-open you.
So WTF is Trixta's solution?
Buy the drink then stay there as if he'd bought the girl with a drink?
Or maybe he would not have bought drink?
Cool-I dont buy drinks neither(never did for girls),but I did state that this would be an exceptional case,where I had the extra cash to waste so WTF!
So guys,Im sorry for being so harsh but if you wanna criticize a routine,state plausibilities and good reasons and not just say it would not work because it wasnt field tested.
Im the king at bar/club game so I know what the hell works!
I dont chase girls in club like loosers.
I throw my routine,then leave!
Knowing that 90% of the times,the set,or a girl from the set WILL re-open me later.
If she doesnt,so what!?
I do routines with like 8 sets,there' bound to be 4 sets or 4 girls who remember me later and will chase me and re-open me.
This' what I do(social-club game) and it works all the time.
I cant count the amount of SNL's I've had from bars & clubs since 2004(when I officially dicovered the community at about age twenty- two).
So guys,dont discredit my shit(unreasonably)until you try it.
It will work for me without even field testing because Im a savage at social game and I can feel when a routine will work or not(for me).
If Blondguy & Trixta need to field test their materials to know if it would work,yall need to have more confidence in your material & selves.
You have to feel it working before you try it in field,and not just trying shit which you have no confidence in.
Here is the full quote, will now reply to it in segments.
Quote:
So the random looser should've stuck around and stalked the girl(s),opposed to rolling off and re-open later?
I didn't say you should stick around and stalk the girl - you said that (straw man). But surely staying with them instead of giving them time to forget you is better.
I also noticed how your tone was a lot more aggressive than my question; are you trying to bash the person rather than bash their reasoning?
Quote:
And which women you know who isnt into or facinated by Astrology & ESP stuff?
I don't know any woman fascinated by it, but of course that's not to say there aren't any. I didn't actually question the astrology stuff so this is irrelevant.
Quote:
And dont be an idiot Trixta:if one knows the policies of the bar/club,then he wont attempt to tap the bartender.
But that doesnt have to be done;you can simply chat to the bartender as though yall are acquiantance.
9 out of 10 times,he wont refuse to chat a bit since he's trying to sell drinks and get tips.
The first two sentences are true I suppose, but 9 times out of 10 he
will refuse to chat a bit
because he's selling drinks. If I wanted serving and the bar guy was just stood there chatting I'd be ticked off.
Quote:
Trixta,this wont work for you because you're to blind to think that a community guy will let this girl re-open him to beg a drink later on.
I've never field tested this routine but I've field tested many like this,even canned stuff with great success.
All because I rolled off and walked away.
But it seems like Trixta prefers to hound the girls,peck them all night and be a bug.
Which girl would think a guys' weird for doing a routine then walking off like he doesnt care?
Perhaps the chiccs I'd done this to[walk away]and laid them at the end of the night.
So before you knock the routine-try it.
If not,come u with reasonable reasons why you think it wont work!!
Ok, so first you're making an assumption about why this oh so excellent routine won't work for me despite only having read my reasonable questions from the start of this thread.
Secondly, you're saying that I prefer to "hound the girls,peck them all night and be a bug", which you would obviously know (NAT) and which still doesn't answer my reasonble statements whether it's true or not making this attack irrelevant.
"So before you knock the routine-try it." There is a flying teapot orbiting the Earth since the beginning of time. Before you knock it, prove that it isn't there!
Quote:
If not,come u with reasonable reasons why you think it wont work!!
I did. It's in my original post which you so far haven't really answered. The fact that it isn't even field tested is a perfectly reasonable reason.
Quote:
If not,come u with reasonable reasons why you think it wont work!!
You have a weak mentality & frame so this routine wont work for you.
Again, I did. See post above. I'd also love your powers that can instantly judge that I have a weak mentality and frame because I questioned your post.
Quote:
You cannot go wrong with this routine because you're not demanding anything from the girls!!
You can. It might not work.
Quote:
So WTF is Trixta's solution?
Considering that I'm questioning your non-field tested method this doesn't really matter; it's your method you should be defending. But the solution would be not to buy the girl a drink.
Quote:
Cool-I dont buy drinks neither(never did for girls),but I did state that this would be an exceptional case,where I had the extra cash to waste so WTF!
Yeah, what the fuck! You have extra cash to waste, why not waste your own time too!
Quote:
Im the king at bar/club game so I know what the hell works!
Speaks for itself. We have here a true pioneer of PUA; a guy so great who knows what works and what doesn't before it has been field tested. Tell me O Great One, if I were to suddenly get my knob out on the dancefloor to DHV that I just don't give a fuck and start doing windmills with it to show off my various abilities with my dick (insinuation that I am a man of many talents, a further DHV, DING DING DING JACKPOT), would it have women licking me? If so, I will do it tomorrow knowing that when I drop my kegs I will have women all over me because you are the king of bar/club game!
Quote:
It will work for me without even field testing because Im a savage at social game and I can feel when a routine will work or not(for me).
If Blondguy & Trixta need to field test their materials to know if it would work,yall need to have more confidence in your material & selves.
Here's another major flaw. Generally people need to field test materials to see
if it actually works, not just if it works in their head.
Do you think the Wright brothers came up with the idea of the airplane and claimed they'd invented it before they'd even built it? No, here's what actually happened.
-They thought of the idea
-They worked on the idea
-They field tested the idea
to see if it worked.
I honestly believe this is similar to threads that Fin was referring to in his thread. People are making whimsical threads from the top of their heads, and when so called thread stands up to scrutiny instead of defending it they come up with
-Well what's your solution?
-So instead you would do bla bla bla (insert straw man here)
-Assume that we would rather try things that we don't have any confidence in all the time rather in rather than something that we do feel would work
-Claim that reasonable arguments are not reasonable but instead nonsensical, ludicrous claims against the Wise Words of the "king of bar/club game".
Please tell me what is not reasonable about claiming that something can't be proven to work if it has not been proven to work.
Quote:
{to Blondguy}But you have no point in saying,"because a routine hasnt been field tested it isnt worth..."
There is a reason why people say "an unwritten contract is not worth the paper it is written on". Because quite literally, it isn't.