Quote:
1. Not everyone needs to fake it till they make it, plus if you fake till you make, their is a real chance that you never transist.
I would bet most of the worst AFC's DO need serious training wheels, which is what I see MM as being designed for, or they wouldn't be looking for pick up help. The ones that really don't & are looking to just to get better with women & already have some game or social skills presumably, would grow bored pretty fast & move on to more like most of us natural based systems. If they didn't I don't think they are really that advanced.
Regardless it gets most off the couch or at least did me, & trying, & gives particularly unattractive guys a guideline of how to go indirect. Style even made mention of having to go more indirect being less attractive & as why he believed so much in the system. It gets you in field learning & laid which I bet & better than many that look for the help are doing. Don't see the need to tear it down to much even if their is a rare guy that never got it & transitioned. Worse in my mind to criticize the system to newbies who have confidence in it and will try it where as if they try say speed seduction or total direct natural game might last a week after harsh rejections.
Quote:
2. Disarmed, again why the hell would she be armed? And no every system does not use it, plus disqualifiers are very different from negs.
Not according to Mystery who pioneered both...
http://www.seductionbase.com/seduction/ ... n/182.html
most systems I have seen have some form of neg or rapport break. Even speed seduction/NLP.
Quote:
3. I don't care about what durden says

The point stands, this idea that your only talking to her for conversation is true maybe 20% of the time when sarging, the rest of the time it's just bullshit.
I think it's pretty telling you confused a belief statement like "i'm giving them a chance to speak with me" from coming from anything other than a natural based game & it was actually from TD's "Being the Selector". Hardly MM, which BTW he started in like most. I see nothing wrong with coming in indirect though, which is what MM is based on. Eventually in the model you qualify and move the interaction forward. if you don't you aren't doing it correctly.