I'm in a world of confusion



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:34 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:06 am
Posts: 2540
Quote:
Quote:
...women do most of the dumping.
And the majority of women file the divorce while the majority of men want to make the relationship work.

https://academic.oup.com/aler/article/2 ... st-divorce

Yep.

If a man gives consistent orgasms, and is not a beta, this will not happen to him.

Attractive women have had abundance mentality their entire lives. It's why it's so easy for women to dump men early. They know ten more will take the place of the one.

Women are rifting through men to find the dominant males. When they find one, they become obsessed, and the dominant male decides who is and isn't in his life. It's a FREAK turn of nature for them, an aphrodisiac to have a man with options and emotional control. Kick in good bedroom skills, and it's even harder for women to walk away.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:44 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 am
Posts: 3904
Quote:
This is complete nonsense, IMHO. Any man with a dick is going to love what happened to the OP, and not get on a soap box until the deed is long over.

Come on, man. Do you guys ever hang around multiple women at the same time? The flirting, the partying, the laughter, the slight touching, the long raven and blonde hair fliping about the room ,etc?

Come. The. Fuck. On.

Having two girls on your dick at the same time is an amazing feeling. You're simply not going to care about the repercussions at the time.
See Arch, thats where I differ. I'm not going to make excused for my lack of morals. And if I do, I have to afford a girl the same luxury. Sex is great, the long raven and blonde hair, all thats great. But that doesnt mean you as a man should forget your morality for some pussy. We're grown men. If you're against cheating, I'm holding you to hold your morality even in a sexual position. See, if OP's chick had him blindfolded and she brought in a drunk chick, should he continue? If she brought in a 15 yr old chick? As ADULTS, your morals only matter when tested. I wouldnt give myself the excuse that oh I was so turned on, same way I wont if it was a minor brought into the room. If you are against cheating, you dont allow it to happen. As adult men, as men with options, as men who've had sexual encounters, I cant excuse dismissing your morality because of being turned on. Same way I wont hear girl say well I cheated on you because I was just turned on. If you're against cheating, hold to that, dont just say the words and then excuse yourself from that standard when its difficult. And if you allow yourself leeway, give the chick the same. Pussy aint that special for me to push morality aside, maybe at 15, not now. I dont know, maybe where you stand on an issue, depends on factors and whether its difficult for you. Not me. I wont say Im against something and excuse it.
Quote:
No, he became the dominant male when he confronted her about her behavior. If he had set this standard early on, this doesn't happen.
Lol, if he confronts her and gets the truth, its because he was dominant
if he confronts her and gets dumped, its because he was weak

Do you realize how interchangably you're using the whole dominance/weak thing? I mean, you do see how its like you're cold reading right?
Quote:
No, it means most men get dumped within two weeks. This, combined with becoming emotionally-uncentered is why women do most of the dumping.
Arch, do you not see how you flip flop? How myself, jack the op, is not confused by what you're saying; moreso that you'll say one thing and then change it? If dumping after 2 weeks due to orgasms is what you meant, why bring it into a discussion of a year long relationship? See how I wasnt even speaking of dumping or 2 weeks timeframe? You told the guy to say nothing, when he confronts you say he was being dominant.

Lol, yall have now gone to divorce, when OP's girl was going to fuck and come back to him. No mention of her dumping him or leaving him. Now its turned into divorce.

The OP beat all of your assumptions.

In shape? Dude is a damn personal trainer
Sexual experience? Been with 100s of women, 40 years on the planet, and believes strongly he gets real orgasms.
Alpha? Alpha enough to get his girl to give him a 3 some and fuck him reg?

But no...it cant be that you are wrong....his gf didnt get real orgasms and he wasnt dominant....the 3 some doesnt at least suggest he knows what he's doing, his girl wanted to please him and his gf enjoys sex with him. He's weak lol.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:51 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:06 am
Posts: 2540
Quote:

See Arch, thats where I differ. I'm not going to make excused for my lack of morals.

hahahha this is such bullshit, Neo. If you were dating a girl, and she brought in another cute gf to blow you, you would not think "oh my god, these women are corrupting my morals!"


Come. On. Man. This just shows it's never happened to you.


This is why I'm really a starting to doubt some of the posters on this forum. No man with a dick still attached would have that thought go through his head in that moment. Your loving gf, who you really care for, blowing you with her cute friend.

Morals?

Bullshit.





Quote:
See, if OP's chick had him blindfolded and she brought in a drunk chick, should he continue? If she brought in a 15 yr old chick? As ADULTS, your morals only matter when tested.
Wow, these analogies are horribly flawed.

Quote:
The OP beat all of your assumptions.

Great shape? Dude is a damn personal trainer
Sexual experience? Been with 100s of women, 40 years on the planet, and believes strongly he gets real orgasms.
Alpha? Alpha enough to get his girl to give him a 3 some?

But no...it cant be that you are wrong....his gf didnt get real orgasms and he wasnt dominant....the 3 some doesnt at least suggest he knows what he's doing, girl wanted to please him and his gf enjoys sex with him. He's weak lol.

The OP is doing well, IMHO. But it could just be that attraction faded. It happens in relationships.

It's not my job to point out the obviously good, but rather see potential holes.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 3:56 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:30 am
Posts: 47
Quote:
Quote:
The relationship should have ended that night when you saw how easy it was for her to be a part of cheating.


This is complete nonsense, IMHO. Any man with a dick is going to love what happened to the OP, and not get on a soap box until the deed is long over.

Come on, man. Do you guys ever hang around multiple women at the same time? The flirting, the partying, the laughter, the slight touching, the long raven and blonde hair fliping about the room ,etc?

Come. The. Fuck. On.

Having two girls on your dick at the same time is an amazing feeling. You're simply not going to care about the repercussions at the time.



Quote:
If you had continued being the dominant male, you just wouldnt have found out.
No, he became the dominant male when he confronted her about her behavior. If he had set this standard early on, this doesn't happen.


Quote:
If not giving real orgasms lead to women going elsewhere, yet the majority of men cant give a woman an orgasm, doesnt this mean that most women will just cheat?
No, it means most men get dumped within two weeks. This, combined with becoming emotionally-uncentered is why women do most of the dumping.
Arch Stanton. This is become rather tiring. Until the moment we had the menage a trois, we had never talked about doing them. She has always known that I do not tolerate cheating. The moment she mentioned that the chances of it happening, I told her no. If that's not establishing a standard, like I've asked you before but you did not answer, please tell me how to establish it and quit acting as if I made some sort of mistake. Please offer a solution instead of saying that I wasn't doing something right and then later saying I did do it right.

Just a side note. If I would have listened to you from the beginning, I would be sitting here tomorrow night not knowing my girlfriend was cheating because you were telling me everything was okay. So please stop putting me down while you sat there and didn't give me any information. I appreciate you rooting for me but I wasn't looking for a cheerleader. I was looking for good, solid advice.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:24 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 am
Posts: 3904
Quote:
hahahha this is such bullshit, Neo. If you were dating a girl, and she brought in another cute gf to blow you, you would not think "oh my god, these women are corrupting my morals!"


Come. On. Man. This just shows it's never happened to you.


This is why I'm really a starting to doubt some of the posters on this forum. No man with a dick still attached would have that thought go through his head in that moment. Your loving gf, who you really care for, blowing you with her cute friend.

Morals?

Bullshit.
The reason I say this, is because I havent just learned abt or started having pussy yesterday. Ive had married women try to fuck, friend's gfs try to fool around, drunk chicks try to fuck. Guess what, I stopped it. Because getting that piece of ass wasnt worth it. Was there a certain point in life when I would or did. Yeah. Shit morals and lack of experience. You sound exactly as I did probably at 19. Sure, 2 chicks going down on me? Fuck it, dont care whether she got a bf or not! When pussy was this great thing. But really, after a certain age, you cant turn down a piece of ass? You keep saying gfs "friend" like the issue was ever that. Its your gfs friend who is in a relationship. Is turning it down hard? Sure, but thats the point. You gotta question where you really stand on things when you have a scenario where you think its ok.
Quote:
Until the moment we had the menage a trois, we had never talked about doing them. She has always known that I do not tolerate cheating. The moment she mentioned that the chances of it happening, I told her no. If that's not establishing a standard, like I've asked you before but you did not answer, please tell me how to establish it and quit acting as if I made some sort of mistake. Please offer a solution instead of saying that I wasn't doing something right and then later saying I did do it right.


OP, the sex was bad, she was faking for the past year. All those chicks you fucked, you didnt learn how to make one cum. That 3 some she gave you, wasnt because she enjoyed fucking you and liked you enough to please you, she did it because only with the chick she could get off. You never let her know cheating was not ok, hence you had poor boundaries and this is what happens. You're in great shape, but you need to roid up for more sex appeal and dominance, plus the Paul walker thing doesnt help. You didnt give orgasms, so she was going to get one from the guy whose gf cheated on him, probably because she didnt get real orgasms either. Confronting her was the one right thing you did. Thats just the jist of it right?


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:33 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:30 am
Posts: 47
Quote:
Confronting her was the one right thing you did. Thats just the jist of it right?
It was neurotic and weak until it was the right thing but everything else was very accurate.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:23 am 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
Quote:
Quote:
I never talked down to the op. I treated him as an adult man who needed some emotional support and some insights on his situation. In fact, it was the op who tried talking down to some of us, attacking some of us as persons, and descending into name calling.
That's an outright lie. I was very respectful towards you. The most I did was disagree with the orgasm thing which you later said that you were incorrect and started the whole pussy pounding thing. That's the only time I called anyone names. I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
The above paragraph is highly deceptive and misleading.
Quote:
That's an outright lie. I was very respectful towards you. The most I did was disagree with the orgasm thing which you later said that you were incorrect and started the whole pussy pounding thing. That's the only time I called anyone names. I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
Do you see the ambivalence in the highlighted statements? First the op called my statement an outright lie and then op proceeded to admit to name calling after I sided with his girlfriend. The truth is, the op attacked some us here as persons and not the ideas/advices long before I sided with his girlfriend.

It's just plain ridiculous to call something a lie and then back pedal to admit to the wrongdoing.
Quote:
I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
The highlighted part is misleading and inaccurate.
Quote:
I don't really see any red flags.

But I am starting to feel like the OP is a troll.

As far as the "evil" comment, that was in the context of weak men and bad game versus attractive women early on, not women you're exclusive with who tell you they love you.

Context is a wonderful thing.
Arch described his feelings. He did not call the op a troll.
Quote:
You're acting neurotic and weak, OP. You have no evidence she's doing this.
In here, Arch described the op's actions.

As you can discern from above, the op painted some of the posters in a bad light because they provided the contrarian advice/insights he did not want to hear.

In this forum, it's not a matter of choosing which advice to follow but rather it's about the collective intention of several experienced posters to help a bro in need of help. Whether he chooses a particular advice or not, that doesn't matter. What matters is that he got several perspectives on a problem from clear thinking individuals during a time when he is in great emotional distress and has clouded judgment due to duress.

I'm now going to toot my own horn in this matter to illustrate a point. I kept silent about this in the entire thread until now. I'm 47. I'm dating several women in the 18 - 23 years old age range. And I have been in several threesomes already. By several, I mean more than three times. Not many, but several. If the op did not like the quality of my insights in this thread, that's fine with me. The bottomline is that he feels better now compared to a few days ago.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Last edited by Monsignor Crisanto on Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:40 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:30 am
Posts: 47
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I never talked down to the op. I treated him as an adult man who needed some emotional support and some insights on his situation. In fact, it was the op who tried talking down to some of us, attacking some of us as persons, and descending into name calling.
That's an outright lie. I was very respectful towards you. The most I did was disagree with the orgasm thing which you later said that you were incorrect and started the whole pussy pounding thing. That's the only time I called anyone names. I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
The above paragraph is highly deceptive and misleading.
Quote:
That's an outright lie. I was very respectful towards you. The most I did was disagree with the orgasm thing which you later said that you were incorrect and started the whole pussy pounding thing. That's the only time I called anyone names. I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
Do you see the ambivalence in the highlighted statements? First the op called my statement an outright lie and then op proceeded to admit to name calling after I sided with his girlfriend. The truth is, the op attacked some us here as persons and not the ideas/advices long before I sided with his girlfriend.

It's just plain ridiculous to call something a lie and then back pedal to admit to the wrongdoing.
Quote:
I didn't even call Arch Stanton names after he called me a troll for not contacting him and let's not forget neurotic and weak. You can correct me if I'm wrong by quoting the statement where I started the disrespect.
The highlighted part is misleading and inaccurate.
Quote:
I don't really see any red flags.

But I am starting to feel like the OP is a troll.

As far as the "evil" comment, that was in the context of weak men and bad game versus attractive women early on, not women you're exclusive with who tell you they love you.

Context is a wonderful thing.
Arch described his feelings. He did not call the op a troll.
Quote:
You're acting neurotic and weak, OP. You have no evidence she's doing this.
In here, Arch described the op's actions.

As you can discern from above, the op painted some of the posters in a bad light who provided the contrarian advice he did not want to hear.
It's an outright lie because you are acting like you were being so nice and not talking down to me until I've all of a sudden disrespected you. Fine, he didn't call me a troll or neurotic or weak. He didn't offer any solutions. He just sat around making accusations that were not true while he was rooting for me.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:51 am 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
Quote:
It's an outright lie because you are acting like you were being so nice and not talking down to me until I've all of a sudden disrespected you. Fine, he didn't call me a troll or neurotic or weak. He didn't offer any solutions. He just sat around making accusations that were not true while he was rooting for me.
And now a sudden change in your statement.

You have to rest op and bury the hatchet. You are still under duress. This problem is over. I'm done with this thread.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:59 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:30 am
Posts: 47
Quote:
Quote:
It's an outright lie because you are acting like you were being so nice and not talking down to me until I've all of a sudden disrespected you. Fine, he didn't call me a troll or neurotic or weak. He didn't offer any solutions. He just sat around making accusations that were not true while he was rooting for me.
And now a sudden change in your statement.

You have to rest op and bury the hatchet. You are still under duress. This problem is over. I'm done with this thread.
Lol. No change in my statement when it comes to you. Arch Stanton, I'm sorry for saying that you were calling me names when you were simply making false statements. Monsignor Crisanto, you provided absolutely no use here except for teaching Arch Stanton what an orgasm is.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:49 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: Romania
So Arch, were "all those guys saying a favor was owed" right?

By you onslaught about dominance and real orgasms, the OP had a 3some with her gf, and her friend that has a boyfriend. So that means the boyfriend didn't provide his girl with orgasms and dominance.
Now the boyfriend was about to get the same SPAM as the OP. But we was weak because he was cheated on already. So how the hell did it happen?


@OP, I still don't think this is that big of a deal. If I were in your shoes I'd probably be pissed off about the lying too, but I'd also keep in mind that she did try to approach you honestly. Except you were having none of it and that's really not ok seeing as how you had absolutely no issue when she brought another woman in the bedroom for you.
Like Neo said, if this is a dealbreaker for you then also hold yourself to the same standards. Or give the women in your life the same leeway you give yourself.

_________________
I know my place. It's me on top of the world.

My in depth texting & dating guide.
There's no such thing as shit-tests.
How to keep a girl.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:34 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 3:06 am
Posts: 2540
Quote:
Quote:
It's an outright lie because you are acting like you were being so nice and not talking down to me until I've all of a sudden disrespected you. Fine, he didn't call me a troll or neurotic or weak. He didn't offer any solutions. He just sat around making accusations that were not true while he was rooting for me.
And now a sudden change in your statement.

You have to rest op and bury the hatchet. You are still under duress. This problem is over. I'm done with this thread.

The OP is a troll. This entire story is bullshit.

End of thread for me as well.

_________________
Pickup coach. PM for direct, simple coaching.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:19 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: Romania
The only bullshit in this thread is yours Arch.
You're a keyboard warrior. And you're accusing OP of being a troll because that's your last line of defense. It's pathetic.

You got lucky with your 20 year old gf. And I know that because you act exactly like the guy who won the lottery and is now giving advice on how to make money, as if he earned it.

You did not.

_________________
I know my place. It's me on top of the world.

My in depth texting & dating guide.
There's no such thing as shit-tests.
How to keep a girl.


Last edited by R.C on Thu Feb 23, 2017 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 am
Posts: 3904
Quote:
By you onslaught about dominance and real orgasms, the OP had a 3some with her gf, and her friend that has a boyfriend. So that means the boyfriend didn't provide his girl with orgasms and dominance.
Now the boyfriend was about to get the same SPAM as the OP. But we was weak because he was cheated on already. So how the hell did it happen?
It seems that a weak guy (the roommate's cuckold bf) was about to get a 3some. Maybe you can explain rc how OP was weak, but got a 3some, the cuckold was weak and was about to get a 3some. Or maybe they were both dominant? Does being cheated on and staying with the chick get you a 3some? RC please make this make sense for me.... I think Arch is just trying to dismiss this because it hits home. OP could very well have taken his advice and said nothing, continued on and come back to the forum saying "a favor is owed" is bs. Arch, this was not directed to your similar situation and if you continue to trust your gf, let it be because of her character and loyalty, not because you think its a weak vs dominant thing. You can say OP didnt have boundaries or whatever, but the roommates cuckold bf WAS abt to get a 3some. If you trust someone, let it be for the right reasons. As a side note, you said your gf reads these, wont she see you as weak when she reads you coming here to keep her attention, and going through her phone? All Im saying is if this matches your situation, and you trust your gf, dont hang it on these shifting rationalizations and find something solid to hang your faith on.

Op, what are you going to do?


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:53 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: Romania
Quote:
It seems that a weak guy (the roommate's cuckold bf) was about to get a 3some. Maybe you can explain rc how OP was weak, but got a 3some, the cuckold was weak and was about to get a 3some. Or maybe they were both dominant? Does being cheated on and staying with the chick get you a 3some? RC please make this make sense for me.... I think Arch is just trying to dismiss this because it hits home.
He is, that's why I called it out. It makes no sense because it's a contradiction.

_________________
I know my place. It's me on top of the world.

My in depth texting & dating guide.
There's no such thing as shit-tests.
How to keep a girl.


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 157 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link