Quote:
Unlike religion which is faith-based (you don't need any proof to take people's money), the MPUA forum gives free samples that we can test on field. To see and experience is to believe; that's how many of us get to buy PUA products not just through marketing hype.
I just think the marketing copy for the sales video has been poorly executed. Having field tested several of the Chief's techniques, I am more likely to believe him than some religious guy's say so.
Did you even read the article!?
I already knew that the fact that it was in a religious site would take away most of his credibility from the start, guess the disclaimer didn't come true with is purpose, it was sadly expected. The thing is, it could be found in other places without the religious innuendo, is not that important, in fact, doesn't matter at all. It was a means to a end.
If you want to go deeper in the subject prized in the said 'article', read the book from whish it was
abridged, i must warn thou, it's a little bit heavy.
It was only referred as a mean to set a premises to my thoughts in the matter, apparently rather radical.
As you may find if you keep reading, i believe this porn people came from a very unhealthy and damaging place. Thus, my difficulty in attributing props to anything that comes form there, even so, i can always be persuaded.
As for the op, I'm not refusing is view, i'm only offering mine, is what people do in forums, is what he expected when he opened this thread, i hope.
I have a open mind, and good judgment, i like to believe, but blindly trust that the product is worthy just because he says so, plus the arguments he used, it's just not good enough for me, i don't have the same kind of relationship that you have. Once again, don't misinterpret me. It's is opinion, i respect that.
Now, back to where i was.
The men and women that appear in the pornographic videos are respective actors and actress, why ?, well, because they are performing. And what does this imply? To start, the scenes are directed to the viewers, to appease their longings instead of those acting, that's why that crap took hours and hours of filming to be edited in the end, by the way, the order displayed is almost never the filming order, normaly they start with the end.
With fake motions, fake moans, fake orgasms, weird fucking positions due to the camera angles so they can oversize the cocks in the screen, or go as far as to use rubber ones. All this with the solo intent to play with the costumers insecurities and anxieties, and in doing so, perpetuate the porn ultimate myth, dick size not only matters but is everything, and if you don't have one big enough to play golf with, well, it's a death sentence, you may as well forget about connecting with real women in general and conformed yourself to shoot your loads into a pc screen, or mac, for those of you that insist to be different. All you need is a quick peek in a porn site to see what kind of publicity they entice people in.
In the current world with the availability of such 'entertainment', one may fall into believing that whatever they do portraits the reality of sexual intercourse. Can you see the pitfalls?
Many of us go so far as to use that as learning platform, and go on to emulate whatever one saw.
Once more, I'm not saying this from a moral standpoint, fuck morals. I'm pointing this out simply because such approach is harm full, unless you want to go around having shallow, emotionless, detached, awkward, 'robotic' type sex. Providing that somehow you already have a girl to 'experiment' with.
I'm stating this due that i firmly believe that an average Joe banging the same woman for years in a row (not constantly, lol) knows more about pleasing their girls than this self proclaimed professional sex gurus.
One could also assume that this 'guys' found themselves in the porn business, due to their heightened sexual frame that lead them in the ultimate chase for pussy. Mind blowing, right!? And you can correct me if i am wrong, but using PUA lingo as a resource one could go and call most of these fuckers, Naturals. In others words, they could naturally attracts girls to begin with, no surprise there.
Even that the 'quality' of the girls is very disputavel.
And yes, as a result of their work 'ambience', one can also fairly assume that they are more comfortable around a women from a sexual framework.
Proceeding with this line of thought, yes, some of them would display less neediness, less despair, they would be more outcome detached and more calibrated and in tune with their display of 'animal' energy .
And so would be a experienced 'real world' seducer (or PUA). Much better IMHO, because the seducer instead of enter a stage already naked, mute with a quimical induced boner, needs to be social savvy, articulated, elegant, between many other things, depends from is voice tone, grooming, personality, oratory skills, ability to set up meetings and many others logistic related affairs, handling multiple sex partners, in different stages of receptiveness, being proficient at interact with men and women in more or less social settings. And much, much more. That's why the PUA lingo was invented, to move throughout all this.
Just food for thought.
What kind of asset's does invariably a porn male actor have outside the film setting?
All of you, for fucks sake, don´t answer monster cook.
CHAT
