Screwed up with an almost-married woman. What would you do?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:13 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 4:14 pm
Posts: 689
Quote:
Quote:
Such as special flower isn't she?
...
Stop fooling yourself. You're falling for her. Or else you would have already made a move instead of spending 6 months contemplating about what to do to get this chick and then coming on the forum to try and "fix" things. We are what we do - and no matter what you may "think" your behavior proves otherwise.

Seriously, just move the fuck on. To women who don't have children and long term relationships that you may fuck up. And next time, don't act like a pussy for 6 months - invite her out and ESCALATE, push the physical boundaries a bit, and ensure that she reciprocates before you start talking about feelings and shit.
I think I played the game right. I just choked on the close for whatever reason. Lesson learned. Won't happen again.

Special flower? At the risk of sounding like a pussy...Yes! That's the whole point of game, isn't it?: to have sex with lots of women and to fall for the "special flowers" among them. If a guy's not doing that, I think he's missing half the point.

Six months is not unheard of when gaming committed women, especially when you don't see them regularly or for several weeks at a time. It's a painfully slow process. You can't ask them out. That's a date. It's too direct. They need plausible deniability. And they could be spotted by someone they know. Direct might work in some rare instances, but you'll scare most of them off -- especially the "special flowers." :)

Regarding the morality of gaming committed women: some guys are against it, some aren't. I'm in the middle. Nothing in life is black and white, including this issue. Each person just has to decide what's right based on the circumstances. I game single women, but this committed one just happened to come along and she was super cool, so I went with it. It happens. As for the kids, as long as they have loving parents who are committed to them, it doesn't matter if those parents are committed to each other. Better to have happy single parents than miserable committed ones. Mine were divorced. It had zero effect on me. They were both great on their own. That's for her to work out.

Appreciate your opinion!
Thanks for your level headed response. Let me just address the issues you raised:
Quote:
Special flower? At the risk of sounding like a pussy...Yes! That's the whole point of game, isn't it?: to have sex with lots of women and to fall for the "special flowers" among them. If a guy's not doing that, I think he's missing half the point.
The problem is that this woman ISN"T a special flower buddy. Not at all. You want her primarily because she's a somewhat attractive woman that shows a SMALL level of interest that you can't have. There are millions (millions!!!) like her.
Quote:
Six months is not unheard of when gaming committed women, especially when you don't see them regularly or for several weeks at a time. It's a painfully slow process.
No, gaming is not and should NOT be a "painfully slow process". What is happening here is that you are painfully and slowly wasting your time. When you could be actually spending that time with women who are as beautiful and intelligent without as significant barriers to date.
Quote:
Direct might work in some rare instances, but you'll scare most of them off -- especially the "special flowers."
I think you're getting things a bit confused here. Asking a woman out will never scare them off if you've laid the groundwork correctly. Plausible deniability *might* be necessary for sex, but if you've gotta hide the fact that you're interested, then there's a massive problem there.
Quote:
the "special flowers." :)
The fact that you've treated her like a special flower is EXACTLY why after six months you received a "thanks but no thanks" from her. Think about that for a while.
Quote:
Regarding the morality of gaming committed women
I am not debating the morality aspect here. I am debating the PRODUCTIVITY aspect here. What I am saying is, you can better spend your time seeking out women who do not have a significant committment to someone else and who are obviously extremely hesitant in leaving their partner.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:34 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:50 pm
Posts: 2864
Quote:
The fact that you've treated her like a special flower is EXACTLY why after six months you received a "thanks but no thanks" from her. Think about that for a while.
Truer words have never been spoken.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:28 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:18 am
Posts: 7
Quote:

The fact that you've treated her like a special flower is EXACTLY why after six months you received a "thanks but no thanks" from her.
Do you think this applies just as much to married women and those in long-term relationships? (This is my first experience with one.)

In 'The Game,' Neil Strauss wrote: "If a woman has been married three years or more, you come to learn that she’s usually easier to sleep with than a single woman."

I've seen this theory elsewhere, too. The idea is that these women are neglected and taken for granted by their men, so you just have to step in and give them the attention they're not getting at home.

Obviously, you never want to look needy or like you don't have an abundance of choices, but I thought we could break a few rules in these cases and give a few more compliments, let them know we're into them instead of hiding it, and not act so nonchalant like we would with a single girl. In other words, give them the "special flower" SPAM (at least a little bit).


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:12 pm 
Offline
King Among Mortals
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 7592
Location: United States
Quote:
Quote:

The fact that you've treated her like a special flower is EXACTLY why after six months you received a "thanks but no thanks" from her.
Do you think this applies just as much to married women and those in long-term relationships? (This is my first experience with one.)

In 'The Game,' Neil Strauss wrote: "If a woman has been married three years or more, you come to learn that she’s usually easier to sleep with than a single woman."

I've seen this theory elsewhere, too. The idea is that these women are neglected and taken for granted by their men, so you just have to step in and give them the attention they're not getting at home.

Obviously, you never want to look needy or like you don't have an abundance of choices, but I thought we could break a few rules in these cases and give a few more compliments, let them know we're into them instead of hiding it, and not act so nonchalant like we would with a single girl. In other words, give them the "special flower" SPAM (at least a little bit).

So your target demographic is vulnerable married women? Wounded like baby sheep, so you can pounce soon as you spot a limp?

_________________
They call me the cat whisperer, cause I know exactly what the pussy needs.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:05 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:18 am
Posts: 7
Quote:
So your target demographic is vulnerable married women? Wounded like baby sheep, so you can pounce soon as you spot a limp?
No. As I said, this is my first experience with one -- which is why I ask the question.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:00 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 4:14 pm
Posts: 689
Quote:
Quote:

The fact that you've treated her like a special flower is EXACTLY why after six months you received a "thanks but no thanks" from her.
Do you think this applies just as much to married women and those in long-term relationships? (This is my first experience with one.)

In 'The Game,' Neil Strauss wrote: "If a woman has been married three years or more, you come to learn that she’s usually easier to sleep with than a single woman."

I've seen this theory elsewhere, too. The idea is that these women are neglected and taken for granted by their men, so you just have to step in and give them the attention they're not getting at home.

Obviously, you never want to look needy or like you don't have an abundance of choices, but I thought we could break a few rules in these cases and give a few more compliments, let them know we're into them instead of hiding it, and not act so nonchalant like we would with a single girl. In other words, give them the "special flower" SPAM (at least a little bit).
Quote:
Do you think this applies just as much to married women and those in long-term relationships? (This is my first experience with one.)
Why would it be different?
Quote:
In 'The Game,' Neil Strauss wrote: "If a woman has been married three years or more, you come to learn that she’s usually easier to sleep with than a single woman."
While this may or may not be true depending on the specific situation, I fail to see why this statement has ANY bearing or relevance to treating a woman like a "special flower".
Quote:
give a few more compliments, let them know we're into them instead of hiding it, and not act so nonchalant like we would with a single girl. In other words, give them the "special flower" SPAM (at least a little bit)
No.

If you want to let a woman know you're interested, you show her instead of tell her. Appropriate kino and physical escalation is what does the trick, not blurting out your feelings.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link