Quote:
Not really annoyed, I just expected something else from one of the veterans, I guess you missed my smiley face though.
Well, thanks
Quote:
Regarding the OP though, SURELY you can not advocate living with folks at the age of 32? If you don't agree then that does in fact annoy me. The op doesn't need to read these glimpses of hope that he can stay at home because 'j Daniels has made it work'. You must agree that the OP needs to get the hell out of his wank bubble
Yes, absolutely. Moving out should ideally at least be in his site by now. It's definitely a problem at his age if he's not at least working on a plan or something to get his own place, but it's definitely no excuse to not get laid... that's all I was getting at. I can't claim that he can get laid "just as much" though, because I haven't tried both situations, and I don't know him.
Quote:
It's pretty simple if you ask me, if you were a millionaire, would you continue to live at home?(regardless if you have a girlfriend or not) Probably not, I understand being frugal and being a cheapskate. At least just be honest about it instead of making it out like it's a pick up challenge that you have mastered lol.
I mean, if you're paying a lot to live at home, why do you do it then?
Well no, if I was a millionaire I wouldn't need to split the bills - I'd just buy a place instantly. I'm not trying to imply that it's any kind of challenge or anything to be proud of. I'm just saying I'm neither proud nor ashamed of it.
The general point that I was trying to make is: Living at home isn't an excuse for not getting laid. That's like when people moan about how "money goes to the rich" - yes they have a point, but a lot of those people were once poor... same principle can be applied to women or any other area of life. You could still live a good life if you're poor, but that's no reason to not try to get rich.
Struggling to figure out the best way to word it, so that'll do.