Well, did you read my first postings?
Quote:
Quote:
I feel like Im a pretty good conversationalist in group environment but I struggle in 1on1s.
When talking this over with a friend he said that not every conversation has to be a party and that Im making a big deal out of something thats not. Is this true? or should you always strive to lead the conversation and make it as qualitatively high as possible?
Leading conversations that much = not caring about her own thoughts, looking down on her.
In parties this is okay because you're supposed to be having fun, not talking about anything serious.
"Caring about her thoughts too early"
If you don't pay attention to what she says she is going to notice it.
"would devalue a man a majority of the time"
Yes, but is valuing always a good thing? Not caring about her thoughts would devalue her, would mean you're looking down on her, would make her uncomfortable, and would make her leave.
"A conversation doesn't necessarily have to be anything of substance as long as you are demonstrating that you are attractive. "
Attractive in what way? In the sense that you're not pushing them away? But that's what you're doing. Or are you gonna say it's their fault that you pushed them away, that they don't find you attractive despite you being so?
"Once that is learned, your behavior becomes automatic and you do it without thinking."
You mean once you've conditioned yourself to not care about her thoughts and always see yourself as attractive despite all cues?