Why Is "Mystery Method" considered dated / crap?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:23 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:00 pm
Posts: 41
I am relatively new to the pick-up community and have learnt most of the basic techniques from people such as Mystery and Neil Strauss, along with a couple of others. Since being on this forum a lot people have told me that some of their theories are dated, even going as far to say a lot of it is bullshit... I can sort of understand some aspects of this with regards to routines that have probably been done a million times or some of the more cheesier aspects like palm-reading, magic tricks and "mind-reading" techniques and all that shit which I would probably never do....

But, is there any other particular reasons why people think they're dated now and who should I look into instead for more contemporary theories.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:21 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:07 am
Posts: 496
Lots of people are more into the natural inner game stuff. I started with stuff by RSD. YouTube RSDAlexander


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:39 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 4:46 pm
Posts: 1707
No idea why ... some of it is crap and contrived but the main principles are actually very solid (Attract, Comfort, Seduce, DHV, etc.)

_________________
http://www.joshsway.com -- dating, online dating, fitness, fashion, and more...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:45 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:07 am
Posts: 496
Quote:
No idea why ... some of it is crap and contrived but the main principles are actually very solid (Attract, Comfort, Seduce, DHV, etc.)
I think a lot of it is due to the modern distaste for routines and lines and canned material.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:03 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:20 pm
Posts: 613
Location: San Antonio
I would say that anyone that calls TMM crap is pretty ignorant.

Since the method has been around a while it is dated, but his seduction concepts are sound and have been around since before him. Mystery derived his method from his experience and books like the 48 laws of power and the selfish gene. I think Neil Strauss talks mentions this in "The Game."

I don't like canned material, but you can easily put your own twist on it so it's not wholey canned. The goal with canned material is to teach you how to be interesting. So you have to look past the fact it's canned and understand the purpose behind what he is teaching.

Same thing with labeling things like "Kino." While this may seem stupid, you have to make sure a girl you want to have sex with is comfortable with touch.

If you step back and look at the method as a whole, it progresses in a logical fassion. If you have any field experience you know this. Next time you are with a girl, skip kissing and just go for her panties. Let me know how it turns out.

Of course, not all seduction follows his method to the T. Sometimes you can skip stages, progress faster/slower, etc.

The whole reason Mystery developed his method was to teach others. It's a beginners course in pickup. Obviously, if your creating a course to teach people that have no idea what they are doing, it can't be written like a theoretical physics book. Few people would be able to understand it. It had to be basic (ie. memorize this routine).

I think even he would yeild partially to the argument it is crap, because he would always agree that the field is the best teacher.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:34 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 773
Location: England
His best insight (in my humble opinion) is that going straight away for comfort instead of attraction will have you lumped in with all other guys and raise the bitch shield. If every guy that exists could grasp this, the male gender would be 100% better off.

_________________
If something's not fun, it's not worth doing


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:23 pm 
Offline
The name of the mothefucking game
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 4210
Website: http://www.dancefloorseduction.com
Location: South Florida
A lot of the ideas and mindset in the method, come from a point of neediness, and that you need to do this or that to get that.... He also tends to make the seduction process logical/analytically, the concept of routines to get specific type of control reactions(bad and needy), seduction in step by step process(you can by pass a lot of the stuff in different situations) i can go on and on and on...

However the way that typical interactions are display are ok, not the content

dude meets a girl

dude more invested initially as interaction goes on

women invest

dude closes.


There is just better stuff out there (funny the dude that gave me 3 starts complain that my book not like mm, i was like thanks god!).

Some good stuff is models, 60 yoc, vin dicarlo attraction code.

_________________
Learn the proper way to maximize your results in a dancefloor/club environment, check out my blog and youtube channel:
http://www.dancefloorseduction.com

Dancefloor/Club game youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/dancefloorseduction


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 9:23 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:29 pm
Posts: 30
Essentially, the MM is the bible of modern pick-up. yes its old as hell, and certain things cannot be translated directly from it anymore, but the principles still apply. Justin Wayne with his domino effect=comfort/seduction. Gambler with his looks, wealth, and flauting= DHVing. All these modern pua's have taken elements from the MM, so its not truly dated in any since of the term. IDK why ppl believe it is though.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:25 pm 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 am
Posts: 3904
Quote:
I am relatively new to the pick-up community and have learnt most of the basic techniques from people such as Mystery and Neil Strauss, along with a couple of others. Since being on this forum a lot people have told me that some of their theories are dated, even going as far to say a lot of it is bullshit... I can sort of understand some aspects of this with regards to routines that have probably been done a million times or some of the more cheesier aspects like palm-reading, magic tricks and "mind-reading" techniques and all that shit which I would probably never do....

But, is there any other particular reasons why people think they're dated now and who should I look into instead for more contemporary theories.
Marketing and product differentiation. No guru is going to say MM is good because this is a business and companies/gurus must differentiate so they must bash the other methods and styles.

People often argue that it's from a mindset of you having lower value. I gotta disagree. It's taken from a point of strategy. You go indirect, not because girls won't accept you for you, but more so because girls are mostly found in groups and without "playing your hand" you can switch targets and play strategically. You go through the 7 hr process for sex, not because they won't sleep with you before that, but because you wan't to build enough time and comfort that you can sleep with them multiple times without making them feel like a slut. You use canned material, not because you don't have interesting stuff to say naturally, but so that you can focus on your nonverbals and body language without worrying about the verbals. These are all words Mystery has stated, but rival marketers twist the concepts to something they are not to capture newbies.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 10:27 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:06 am
Posts: 596
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
IMO Mystery is like a forgotten genious. The reason people think MM is crap is because they blindly focus on the concepts of routines and canned material, and misses all the really valuable stuff. His linearization of the process of picking up/seducing a girl is actually correct, and even if using terms like "kino" and such may sound dorky and lower your value, it's a powerful way to communicate things between fellow "PUAs".

I think Mystery's teachings shines in the early stages of game. Opening for instance, with tips like "rather stand still and speak louder as a girl passes by than walking along chasing her" (tip from Lovedrop), or drop a comment as you walk by, and continue walking a few more steps pretending to focus on something else, to give the girl some space and build comfort. And negs of course, interpreted the right way. My interpretation is either a playful comment that shows that you don't really care whether the girl likes you or not, or a slightly accusing comment (also showing that you don't really want anything from her), but never anything mean! Following these tips after all these years have made it possible for me to open any set without ever being rejected (that is what I would call mastery). And no RSD instructor will ever teach anything like that. Instead, they try to make you deal with the rejections.

His "group theory" is also very good. I've seen PUAs approaching girls in mixed sets, ignoring everyone else, and get the results they deserve (rejections). His group theory shows clearly that indirect approaches are generally the best approaches (just talking to everyone, not anyone specific, to get the acceptance of the group). And when reading about group theory, it is good to have concepts like "preselection" (or rather social acceptance) in order to understand what's happening.

Another little forgotten treasure is the technique "locking in". It is mostly valuable in two scenarios - when the girls are standing against a wall, or a bar. Not as much when sitting at a table (but still worth a little there too). Lock ins are the only "trick" I know of that I believe works. What it means is that you change place with the girl(s), so you are standing against the wall or bar instead of them. I has several psychological effects:

1. The girl doesn't feel threatened (locked in) and is free to leave at any time. That makes her more comfortable staying around talking to you.

2. Since it looks like she is the one interested in you, and not the other way around, makes it more intimidating for other dudes to approach her. With other words, you won't be interrupted as much by others.

3. And again, since she has the choice to leave, but chooses to stay (since she doesn't feel threatened), she has to unconsciously back rationalize why she is staying, and there is only one answer to that - that she likes you. And because of that, she will actually start to like you more.

4. Since seduction requires attention over a longer period of time, you will get exactly that due to the lock in. All she will see is you and the wall, or maybe a bar with a bartender. But she won't be distracted by everything else going on. You will have her full attention, and all you need to do is to stand there talking, putting your spell over her. :)

There is probably more I have forgotten to mention. But I think you get the point.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 4:02 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 5903
Website: http://seductiveintrovert.com
Here's a thread I posted in 2010 on why Mystery Method sucks:

a-more-mature-view-on-why-mm-is-bad-vt74821.html

It really is outdated, primarily because it tries to build attraction in incredibly inefficient ways.

Most of the "attraction" you build using MM's methods like DHVing and such only indirectly builds sexual attraction at best. It doesn't put any emphasis whatsoever on the most direct and efficient ways to spark sexual attraction such as kino and sexualization. It's idea of "solid game" is misguided mental masturbation that further confuses guys as to what attraction really is. You'll find a night-and-day difference between your success rate using MM and your success rate using more modern methods.

Here's a thread I posted in 2009 that further explains sexual attraction and why methods like MM just don't get it:

sexual-attraction-explained-in-depth-vt40419.html

Don't listen to all these guys dogmatically sticking up for Mystery Method. MM is the first method a lot of these guys have been exposed to so there's naturally a loyalty factor because they give credit to Mystery for introducing them to this great new lifestyle. However, people shouldn't let dogmatic loyalty blind them from better ways of going about things.

There's also a lot of intellectual guys in this community and MM just makes a lot of theoretical sense to them. It made a lot of theoretical sense to me, too. However, theoretical sense and the reality of field experience can differ. In the end, the field is king. Whatever you learn from the community, just go out and try it out to see what works better instead of trying to piece it all together in your head from the start.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:10 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:32 am
Posts: 3904
Quote:
The Bad Things About MM

MM stands for Mental Masturbation
Of all the methods in the seduction community, it seems to me that MM encourages mental masturbation THE MOST. If you're not actually stuck in the mental masturbation trap of MM, but you have been before, you know what I'm talking about. I don't need to explain this one to you. If you are a newbie who has found this site right after reading "The Game," however, this one's for you.

Mental masturbation is bad because it creates a comfort zone inside your own head and keeps you from taking action in the physical world. One of the many downsides to MM's analytical nature is that it gives your ego far too many opportunities to rationalize things for the purposes of protection and value-preservation. This actually hinders your progress since you're preventing yourself from calling it like it is. The mental masturbation encouraged by MM will actually create sticking points for you and will force you to dedicate way too much time into this shit than you should. I actually wasted a few YEARS with MM, and I feel like I threw those years away in terms of learning pickup. We can discuss this point further but for now I'm going to move on.

MM's assumptions about attraction
MM assumes that the higher your "value," the higher the attraction. If you've seen this to be true from other experiences that you've had, trust me when I say that correlation does not equal causation. We all learned that one in school. Social value and attraction are related, but you're wasting your time if you're trying to get laid with a DHV story. Other methods have found ways of creating attraction and pushing a seduction forward a hundred times better than what MM could ever offer. Check out that Sexual Attraction thread that I mentioned earlier. Your penis will thank you.

Group Theory
I know I listed this one as a good thing initially but MM puts way too much emphasis on "running sets" and social domination techniques that don't even work out for you in the greatest way in the long run, and not enough emphasis on actually seducing a girl. Sure, you've got Lovedrop teaching pointers on kino escalation here and there, but most other methods have that shit down so much better. Sure, some methods like SS barely have an emphasis on kino escalation at all, but MM is in a pretty low tier when it comes to that, believe it or not. "Would you like to kiss me?" I mean, come on. Really?

Verbal Game
MM is one of the older methods, so I guess it wouldn't be too fair to criticize MM for having such a strong emphasis on verbal game since it's pretty damn close to the era when SS reigned supreme. That still doesn't change the fact that newbies today are using old technology and that they should upgrade. I think MM does teach that it matters more on HOW you say something rather than WHAT you actually say, but it still encourages people to think that WHAT they actually say (routines and DHV stories, for example) is more important than it actually is. David Deangelo already informed us a long time ago that words only make up 7% of communication, but Mystery still told you that you have to indirectly telling girls that you're a preselected protector of loved ones with a story about a stripper ex-girlfriend you've never had.

Dishonesty
It's no secret that MM encourages dishonesty. I don't think I even have to explain how. Unfortunately for the average MM student, consistent HONESTY is one of the most powerful seduction tools you can ever use. Those of us who have been practicing seduction for a long time have already figured this out. And, no, this isn't one of those "direct game vs. indirect game" arguments. You don't have to lie and/or hide behind half-truths to run any sort of game.
Chief, I like your posts but honestly I don't know how you came to these conclusions.
1. Mental masturbation - Can't agree here. Mm is the only if not one of the only schools of pickup that emphasizes going out and practicing. In fact, the newbie mission was something like go out 4 nights a week, every week for a year. MM preaches that only the field will teach you this. Contrasted with other schools, its the furthest thing from mental masturbation. Rsd posts new contradicting videos and articles every day on some new aspect of the game and discuss for hours a million minute concepts and 'paradigm shifts'. Plus red as well as other pickup schools advocate reading other books such as power of now, Tony Robbins, doing meditation while MM kept that stuff simple. So I can't really see how MM is mental masturbation especially compared to the there schools.

2. Attraction - yes the word value is major to MM. But attraction in MM entails teasing, playfulness, statements of intent, games, cold reads, push pull etc. So I can't really consider it as only based on social value.

3. Group theory - yes I can see where the kiss closes are kinda weak. But they are there. There are many routines in MM for Kino with a girl and while they are not as aggressive as new school stuff, its a different style of seduction. New school escalation is more aggressive and dominant, whereas MM is more make her chase you and tease her with escalation. One style gets her turned on from the dominance, one gets her turned on by teasing her physically. Both work and its a matter of preference.

4. Verbal - again its a matter of preference. Some guys like to be the confident direct seducer. Some prefer to charm verbally. Does it matter? No. Once you escalate I don't think anyone can say more verbals vs less verbals or vice versa is more efficient.

5. Dishonesty - yes. It advocates being dishonest with false stories and acting disinterested. You aren't really being genuine and yourself. But what other method allows you to be yourself? Truth is all other books or methods are simply guides that say 'read this, think like I think, see women how I see them, do things I like to do....NOW just be yourself once you've become a version of the writer.' For eg, I met an Rsd guy a few months ago at a college bar and I asked him if he used routines. He said no, because he wants to be himself. But the entire night, he walked around, acted and approached like a mini Tyler or julien. So can you be more yourself with other schools? MM preaches fake it till you make it. Use the routines until you gain an understanding of what works from success. Then you don't need them and you are able to be natural.

In the end, I think MM is definitely good. Its a matter of preference. Some guys want to seduce easily, be physical quickly and bang girls easily. Some guys want to charm a girl, take it slower, build the anticipation. I have friends who do the new stuff IE mode 1, rsd, 60 years.... and then I have friends who do MM. Objectively, I'd say the MM guys I know get more success and quality. And that's across 4 states and different age groups. I go direct most of the time, but I can't deny from seeing actual results that MM is still solid today. I'm a big believer in results and with all the new schools and books, are newbies getting better faster? Has the level of success increased since MM was popular? Guys got good in about a year with MM, and today with other schools the learning curve is the same.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:14 pm
Posts: 273
How can something that's 10 years old be outdated? Women don't change what attracts them early on... If the MM is rubbish now, it was rubbish then (not saying it is). I don't see how it can be outdated...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:49 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:46 am
Posts: 11
Sure it can he peacocks. And negs girl alot with alot of routines. It's better to be good with girl in your core


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 10:04 am 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
Depends really on the "who" considers it crap.

If you're a newbie and are too afraid to approach women, speak to women, hold their hand, look them in the eye and sexualize your intention, then MM might work for you if you want to take it slow till you build up more courage and confidence.

I'm not a fan of Mystery's neg though as I got burned a lot from it.

If you're a newbie and you're bold enough to be sexual and get physical with women, then your odds are better with something like 60 YOC, Stelar's method, or Skills360's dance seduction.

As long as you're getting your penis in vaginas using some component or all components of MM, then you're good. Efficiency is not really the issue here but rather the right fit.

60YOC might be efficient to some but not all dudes are created equal. Many dudes can't even look women in the eye. Lovedrop, for instance, can't eyefuck women and yet he seems to be getting laid.

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link