Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The only in-congruence that I can think of is that since I would purposefully never be "the other man" and by using that as an excuse ("I have a husband.") I was extremely turned off to her and so I went after her friends. They witnessed the whole exchange and were immediately attracted to my alpha-dom. Why bother with a nutjob?
She could fabricate an incongruence. Its weird to look at it this way, but if you flinch when she tests you, she loses attraction. Even if your flinch or failure to pass a test is a genuine reaction you have out of standards.
I prefer to win her over, then target switch in such situations. If she is attracted/on your side and you try to Game her single friends she will help you. This is what works for me. If it does not work for you or something else works for you, use it.
I still prefer to pass all tests. It seems to make my sets go better.
Makes sense but your response was vague and essentially just hypothetical posturing. Do you have any specific pointers?
Specific's would be to ignore tests and change the thread when she tests you, as if it never happened.
Specifics? Like ways I am advocating passing the test?
"I have a husband"
"I really like living in this city."
At that point target switch. You would have passed the test, and the attraction leveraging is just you using her investment and need to test you, and your subsequent passing as a source of pre-selection with her friends. If she knows you are not trying to get her, which is evident by paying attention to her friends, she likes you.
You should figure out relationship status before escalating touching past social touching, that prevents her thinking it is more than it is.
I may be at a loss for the specific answer, so if you would help guide me to help me elaborate I would be glad to clarity my points