Backing Off



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:52 pm
Posts: 1684
Location: Georgia
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
Quote:
This thread has caused me to become asexual.
Fantasizing about bro love = asexual.

_________________
Quote:
Build an emotional connection through your hard throbbing cock.
Build trust and comfort by holding their hands and covertly rubbing your elbows on their nipples.
RSDTyler


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 6:25 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 773
Location: England
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
What I wrote was not intended as a rejection

_________________
If something's not fun, it's not worth doing


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 8:24 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Quote:
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
What I wrote was not intended as a rejection
Do you want to meet halfway between your place and my place? Where the TItanic sunk?


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 8:29 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Quote:
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
Quote:
This thread has caused me to become asexual.
Fantasizing about bro love = asexual.
You just left very little to the imagination, Verjayjay.

You look like your profile picture, Cliff must look like this: [url]http://www.ign.com/pokedex/pokemon/graveler/url]


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:03 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 773
Location: England
Quote:
Do you want to meet halfway between your place and my place? Where the TItanic sunk?
I'll need to consult a satnav before I believe those co-ordinates

_________________
If something's not fun, it's not worth doing


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:48 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Quote:
Quote:
Do you want to meet halfway between your place and my place? Where the TItanic sunk?
I'll need to consult a satnav before I believe those co-ordinates
I literally forgot about Greenland. Let's do this.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:29 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 773
Location: England
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Do you want to meet halfway between your place and my place? Where the TItanic sunk?
I'll need to consult a satnav before I believe those co-ordinates
I literally forgot about Greenland. Let's do this.
Your last post displays exactly what guys are supposed to be doing to get girls: frame control, leadership, masculinity.

And to be a heterosexual man on the receiving end of this from a woman is not only a turn off, it's extremely uncomfortable.

You have left me with nowhere to go in this interaction except a place I really wouldn't want to go.

I don't know how much you are familiar with the terms used in this community, but I will break down our interaction in those terms:

We had quite a lot of posts back and forth where we were entirely in opposition. I was pushing you and you were resisting me. That was fine, guys have no problem with that. Then I made this comment
Quote:
Face it Anime, Versalis is a lot cleverer than you. And his dick's a lot bigger than mine. But you still shouldn't suck it.
For whatever reason, that comment seemed to hit the right spot for you, as instead of continuing to give me shit, you showed evidence of wanting to create a rapport between us:
Quote:
Except for the big dick thing. Let's start a fan club for it. :wink: (but we won't suck it)
The wink, the use of the words "we" and "let's" indicated a desire on your part to get on the same team aka create a rapport.

I could have responded by giving you the rapport you were seeking. But given your previous behaviour both towards me and in the thread generally (being argumentative, making negative generalisations about men), I didn't want to make it that easy for you. So I posted this:
Quote:
Don't wink at me. Go and sit on the naughty step.
This was the key moment where, to use the community's terminology, I wanted you to "fall into my frame" i.e. I wanted you to show a willingness to be led and to adjust your behaviour in accordance with my expectations. I asked nothing specific of you, but the fact I was ordering you around, combined with me taking a slightly parental role towards you, was to guage your willingness to submit to my guidance/direction in any shape or form.

Your response was:
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
This was the point where it was made clear you were not about to fall into my frame, and your desire to create a rapport with me was not strong enough for you to adjust your own frame in any way at all. I took this as a set back, but didn't give up entirely. I posted this:
Quote:
What I wrote was not intended as a rejection
Again this was to imply that this was primarily about you seeking my approval and to give you some inducement to "fall into my frame".

Your next comment about the Titanic was odd and definitely continued you setting your own frame. You then followed up with another comment giving me shit (that's fine in itself, but in the context of the interaction, I was expecting things to have progressed a little beyond that).

My satnav comment if anything was a step back for me, looking back at it, as I actually fell into your frame slightly i.e. allowing you to set the terms of the discussion.

Then the "let's do this" comment.

Making it clear to me that I have three options:

1. Buy into your frame
2. Invest a great deal more effort despite already giving you a couple of opportunities to respond in what I saw as the desired way
2. Quit

#1 is out of the question. #2 would be of questionable wisdom. So here we are.

I should stress that I'm not as calculating as this post makes me sound. I was in the moment as it was occurring, and I did enjoy a lot of it, but looking at it retrospectively, I'm just trying to explain why in my mind, it didn't go in the direction I wanted it to go.

People might have questioned the necessity of me prolonging our interaction as long as I did, but I did it because reading your initial posts, I got the impression you were a person of value who was just a bit lost in terms of how your interactions with others were playing out and why. So I wanted to help if possible (and again, it was fun a lot of the time).

This blow-by-blow (excuse the term, I know it's not to your taste) analysis is just to offer an idea of how your interactions with guys might be going in the real world. Most guys you meet will not break it down in the way that I just have, but that's what this community is for.

If our interaction is anything to go by, your interactions with guys are probably playing out the following pattern:

-Guy meets you, thinks you seem nice, intelligent, possibly attractive (we don't know)
-Engages in initial banter/flirting, takes a bit of shit from you as he expects is normal
-Senses you might be interested, begins testing your willingness to be guided and led by him
-Discovers fairly soon that you're not willing to be guided or led by him, that you will not modify your behaviour or attitude in accordance with his requirements IN ANY WAY, that in fact you will in time seek to be his leader
-Runs a mile

Ultimately though Anime, this all depends on who you are and how much you're willing to change. Some women just don't want to be led by men. Some (perhaps you?) are unwilling to be led by men because they've had previous negative experiences with men and think they're dicks basically i.e. they want to be led but don't find men to be worthy leaders. Some women are just naturally submissive and us guys love them, especially the Japanese ones :)

It depends who you can see yourself becoming. Do you act the way you do because you've had bad experiences with men? Or do you just naturally want to be the leader in a relationship? Because if it's the latter, you'll do great as a lesbian, but any man you have a relationship with will have to be fairly weak, not what we would call a man of value.

_________________
If something's not fun, it's not worth doing


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:53 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 2044
Location: Nottingham, UK
To sum up, you're a 7 who refuses to suck cock. Good luck with that... lol

You are perfect "pump & dump" material. Quality men will use you and lose you (when they discover that you have no bedroom skills). Only the AFC losers leftover will put up with your frigid, unadventurous behaviour.

Unless of course, it is your goal to have a below average AFC boyfriend and a string of one-night stands with slightly above average guys. In which case, you're doing a stellar job, bravo!


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:14 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:19 pm
Posts: 1472
Quote:
To sum up, you're a 7 who refuses to suck cock. Good luck with that... lol

You are perfect "pump & dump" material. Quality men will use you and lose you (when they discover that you have no bedroom skills). Only the AFC losers leftover will put up with your frigid, unadventurous behaviour.
Boom! It's like he's Germany and you're Brazil, darlin'.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:25 pm 
Offline
King Among Mortals
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:36 pm
Posts: 7592
Location: United States
Quote:
To sum up, you're a 7 who refuses to suck cock. Good luck with that... lol

You are perfect "pump & dump" material. Quality men will use you and lose you (when they discover that you have no bedroom skills). Only the AFC losers leftover will put up with your frigid, unadventurous behaviour.

Unless of course, it is your goal to have a below average AFC boyfriend and a string of one-night stands with slightly above average guys. In which case, you're doing a stellar job, bravo!
That 'bout sums it up.

Animepic,

I'm sure if you clot on enough makeup, do a slutty facebook bathroom mirror selfie, some poor AFC will take pitty.

_________________
They call me the cat whisperer, cause I know exactly what the pussy needs.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 8:01 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:52 pm
Posts: 1684
Location: Georgia
Cliff's analysis is pretty much spot on. And it gives very specific feedback point by point on what we've all been saying to you. You are not feminine. You have neutral to masculine traits.

I don't care if you wear cute little skirts and put flowers in your hair. Yes, men are extremely visual creatures and many men will initially find a pretty girl who is dressed cute to be very attractive. But when she reminds him primarily of his buddy Duncan... that tends to fizzle out. Especially if he's masculine and interested in dating. He wants to date a feminine girl.

Since you seem very up for using 1-10 scales, let's use a femininity scale where a Fem 1 is Rosanne Barr and a Fem 10 is Kim Tae-yeon - ulzzang style. You appear to be a Fem 3. As a result, you should attract fairly feminine men.

I'm actually imagining Everybody Love Raymond right now. Fairly wussy guy, with a fairly masculine chick who runs everything.

_________________
Quote:
Build an emotional connection through your hard throbbing cock.
Build trust and comfort by holding their hands and covertly rubbing your elbows on their nipples.
RSDTyler


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:33 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Wow, I didn't realize this had so many posts after Cliff pulled his double-agent act.

There's something that amounts to a real psycho-analysis in here. And I'll respond to Cliff's comments in my next post.

I should probably give a little bit of a background. I was given a professional I.Q. test a while back, during which I was actually high (not a habit, just an accident). I ended up scoring very well. In fact, it was so high, that the proctor said she gets someone with my score once about every two years (this in a college town or a renowned university).

So, the way that make decisions is based off of my own opinion, not what my friends are doing or what my family's doing or what other outlets coerce me to do. It wouldn't be fulfilling to me to follow a gimmick. I'm also an avid follower of red pill blogs, so I can tell what's going on. Finally, I'm aware of the way that Sexual activity effects my market value, so were I to be tempted to just throw caution to the wind and liberate myself, I'd also be painfully aware that that was one tick to the N-count at age 26, making the balancing-act a little more challenging now.

Essentially, the position that I take on blow-jobs is a moral one, so that's one area where I just can't be flexible. I see it as a humanly degrading act. For some perspective, this not a position taken by any feminist or religious leader. In fact, religious leaders and feminists are encouraging women to do this. Just read any feminist blog (excluding Twisty's) and look at some of the comments made by Mark Driscoll and Rabbi Schmuley. In fact, both Driscoll and Schmuley take the stand that a woman must do this to please her husband, or she's sinning. Men my age, be they religious or not, are all at least open to the idea. One feminist post I read said that women should leave male partners who don't want head.

I've read many female, non-feminist bloggers and posts who say that they do this for their husband, so that another woman doesn't. They also say that they have to mentally black-out while doing it. To me, that sounds like a rape victim, and at the very least, it's coercion, because he's threatening to be unfaithful to/ leave his wife if she doesn't perform a certain sexual act. Granted, in marriage, I believe it's wrong to sexually deprive your partner: it's a responsibility to put your sex-life first. And I've had to come to that conclusion on my own, because the women in my life see sex as a tool/ way to show love (or whatever).

Now, morality/ non-negotiables aside:

I agree that I have a very gender-neutral way about me. Online, people seem to think I'm a guy. I wouldn't say that I'm not feminine, I'd just say that my femininity is hard to place. I have a difficult time identifying with most people, let alone the boxed-sets of femininity that are a fit for most women: shy and mysterious, pink and bubbly, etc. I dress well, and look cute, and have long, pretty red hair, and get compliments on my appearance. As far as dressing goes, I'm trying to go for the more "Amy Pond" look now (I don't watch that show, though). That seems to fit okay: I have a similar personality, a similar look, and a similar sex-drive. I'm trying to evaluate what about me personality-wise is inherently feminine, and that's kind of a process.

I think part of it is that I'm not fundamentally feminine, but only have a feminine side. I have a side of me that's gender-neutral and not necessarily sexual, but I also have a side of me that's a woman. The one part of me is interested in intellectual things and easily bored. The other side of me is kind of a mystery to myself, but I'd say I have a higher drive, and don't know how to make dressing or carriage what have you reflect the feminine side. So, the two are at war with one another, in a similar way to how I flirt.

It's not so much that I go out of my way to question authority as it is that this comes naturally to me. In fact, it's one of the pillars of my personality. I can never just exist anywhere: there's always something about me that gets a mob of people really hating me or really liking me, just by my hanging-out in a t-shirt. It's like the essence of who I am calls for contention. I'm the quintessential nail that sticks out, and there's nothing that I can do about it, aside from losing my mind.

One thing that resounds with me, is that I was always the bad kid growing-up, and still am seen that way. It's not that I actually did anything bad, so much as I just was bad. The "problem " was that I was "willful". I don't necessarily want someone who's spineless: I want someone who has their own opinions, and they may be different than mine. I just don't think it's about who's "right" or who "wins". At the end of the day, I get it: being recessive is a sex-thing. If I'm with a guy, it goes without saying that it's about him.

Probably the guy that I'm with would have a similar personality to me. I'd like to start a business with whoever I'm with, so they'd have to be willful. It's a shame that so many men out there are more feminine than I am.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:22 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 773
Location: England
If you ask me (and I know you hang on my every word), the response you get from guys is probably like that emotional/nice guys get from woman. As a guy I'm reading this thinking "hey, this girl is cool, she can break shit down intellectually, and can handle knocks to her self-image in a reflective way, why aren't more girls like this?"

Then I'll chase after the next girl who's like "oh my god stop being such a meany lol"

Just like girls are full of praise for guys who are open and emotional and "wish" more guys were like this. Then throw themselves at guys who have no feelings.

_________________
If something's not fun, it's not worth doing


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:34 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Quote:
[Do you want to meet halfway between your place and my place? Where the TItanic sunk?

I'll need to consult a satnav before I believe those co-ordinates

I literally forgot about Greenland. Let's do this.

Your last post displays exactly what guys are supposed to be doing to get girls: frame control, leadership, masculinity.

And to be a heterosexual man on the receiving end of this from a woman is not only a turn off, it's extremely uncomfortable.

You have left me with nowhere to go in this interaction except a place I really wouldn't want to go.

I don't know how much you are familiar with the terms used in this community, but I will break down our interaction in those terms:

We had quite a lot of posts back and forth where we were entirely in opposition. I was pushing you and you were resisting me. That was fine, guys have no problem with that. Then I made this comment
Quote:
Face it Anime, Versalis is a lot cleverer than you. And his dick's a lot bigger than mine. But you still shouldn't suck it.
For whatever reason, that comment seemed to hit the right spot for you, as instead of continuing to give me shit, you showed evidence of wanting to create a rapport between us:

Except for the big dick thing. Let's start a fan club for it. :wink: (but we won't suck it)

The wink, the use of the words "we" and "let's" indicated a desire on your part to get on the same team aka create a rapport.

I could have responded by giving you the rapport you were seeking. But given your previous behaviour both towards me and in the thread generally (being argumentative, making negative generalisations about men), I didn't want to make it that easy for you. So I posted this:

Don't wink at me. Go and sit on the naughty step.

This was the key moment where, to use the community's terminology, I wanted you to "fall into my frame" i.e. I wanted you to show a willingness to be led and to adjust your behaviour in accordance with my expectations. I asked nothing specific of you, but the fact I was ordering you around, combined with me taking a slightly parental role towards you, was to guage your willingness to submit to my guidance/direction in any shape or form.

Your response was:
Quote:
Go jerk it out with your bro with benefits Versace. He'll enthusiastically give you head, anal, and armpits and lie to you about the flavor. There's so much brotherly love on here.
This was the point where it was made clear you were not about to fall into my frame, and your desire to create a rapport with me was not strong enough for you to adjust your own frame in any way at all. I took this as a set back, but didn't give up entirely. I posted this:
Quote:
What I wrote was not intended as a rejection
Again this was to imply that this was primarily about you seeking my approval and to give you some inducement to "fall into my frame".

Your next comment about the Titanic was odd and definitely continued you setting your own frame. You then followed up with another comment giving me shit (that's fine in itself, but in the context of the interaction, I was expecting things to have progressed a little beyond that).

My satnav comment if anything was a step back for me, looking back at it, as I actually fell into your frame slightly i.e. allowing you to set the terms of the discussion.

Then the "let's do this" comment.

Making it clear to me that I have three options:

1. Buy into your frame
2. Invest a great deal more effort despite already giving you a couple of opportunities to respond in what I saw as the desired way
2. Quit

#1 is out of the question. #2 would be of questionable wisdom. So here we are.

I should stress that I'm not as calculating as this post makes me sound. I was in the moment as it was occurring, and I did enjoy a lot of it, but looking at it retrospectively, I'm just trying to explain why in my mind, it didn't go in the direction I wanted it to go.

People might have questioned the necessity of me prolonging our interaction as long as I did, but I did it because reading your initial posts, I got the impression you were a person of value who was just a bit lost in terms of how your interactions with others were playing out and why. So I wanted to help if possible (and again, it was fun a lot of the time).

This blow-by-blow (excuse the term, I know it's not to your taste) analysis is just to offer an idea of how your interactions with guys might be going in the real world. Most guys you meet will not break it down in the way that I just have, but that's what this community is for.

If our interaction is anything to go by, your interactions with guys are probably playing out the following pattern:

-Guy meets you, thinks you seem nice, intelligent, possibly attractive (we don't know)
-Engages in initial banter/flirting, takes a bit of shit from you as he expects is normal
-Senses you might be interested, begins testing your willingness to be guided and led by him
-Discovers fairly soon that you're not willing to be guided or led by him, that you will not modify your behaviour or attitude in accordance with his requirements IN ANY WAY, that in fact you will in time seek to be his leader
-Runs a mile

Ultimately though Anime, this all depends on who you are and how much you're willing to change. Some women just don't want to be led by men. Some (perhaps you?) are unwilling to be led by men because they've had previous negative experiences with men and think they're dicks basically i.e. they want to be led but don't find men to be worthy leaders. Some women are just naturally submissive and us guys love them, especially the Japanese ones :)

It depends who you can see yourself becoming. Do you act the way you do because you've had bad experiences with men? Or do you just naturally want to be the leader in a relationship? Because if it's the latter, you'll do great as a lesbian, but any man you have a relationship with will have to be fairly weak, not what we would call a man of value.
Yeah, I do spin it around, and that makes men uncomfortable. I guess what I want is for him to spin it around again. I'd be able to do it, so I assume they'd be able to do it. I actually meant the Greenland comment as a compliment, because it showed interest. You enjoyed yourself for the most part, right? I'm pretty good, because I'm creative, but I'd definitely make for a better guy flirt. I'd like to recycle my talents to attract men, instead of totally getting rid of them so that the guy can feel like he did better.

Hm, okay, the rest of the comments.

I took the "naughty step" thing as an actual insult. That was probably the point. You can see that it's natural for me to go back and forth like that: I can be defensive. In fact, I don't hone into flirting, and I can't tell when it's being done. I usually assume that it's not being done. I think men take it as an insult, and then I don't realize that that's what's being done until it's too late. Example:

I was sitting on a bench with my laptop, when a cute guy approaches me:

"Are you afraid that it's going to fall of your lap?'

"Hm, I've never thought of that before. I guess I have a pretty good grip, so it probably wouldn't."

"Well, I'm totally paranoid about it. I got something for my Mac to hold onto it so it doesn't slip-off (..)"

"That's a good point, I'll have to look into that."

I thought I was being recessive and smiley enough, honestly, and he caught me by surprise. I thought he was attractive, outgoing, and I love techies. I thought things were going well, and then he goes, "Well, pleasure to meet you!" Like I'd rejected him. He could have asked me for my number, honestly, I would have picked-up the phone.

I'm partially oblivious, and partially am not used to men showing interest. So, yeah. I'm unassuming, and very literal. I feel like the male race is out to make feel unattractive or something. But you didn't even realize that. I think more men on here should, ha, pick that up. A lot of women I've met have expressed the same opinion: they feel like men have a vague way of flirting, or rather, don't think they're flirting, and don't know what to look for. Genuinely, they don't respond to flirting, not because they want to be mean or shit-test or whatever, but because they don't know it's flirting. You almost have to tell women that you're flirting with them. We don't assume. It's conditioning, because incorrectly assuming makes you look stupid.

Now, to be fair, I'm much less-aware than the average woman. So, so far we've got:

*I can't pick-up on flirting
*I respond to interest with interest, which in a guy's mind, "reframes" the flirting

I'm probably what you could call a "nice girl." I thought that I was "being nice," and you thought that I was "reframing." This is where it gets funny. So men don't like "nice girls" either. And I'm trying harder than other women I know, so just think about the missed opportunities. They're sitting around waiting for men to "be nice to." And many of them are surprised that men aren't going on second dates with them. I think our whole generation was raised to be either forever alone asexuals or forever alone hamsters.

Sometimes, I'll get an epiphany in the shower, and be like, "Wait a minute... this guy was in love with me for two or three years, thought that I was yanking his chain, displayed affection, and I didn't think it was affection, and got mad at me." The reason that I didn't pick-up on his flirting, was that it seemed gender-neutral. Now that I'm older, I think I get it a little bit better, but at the time (these were younger guys), I definitely thought that everything was meant in a brother-way. Typical young-lady mistake.

Other than that, sometimes I forget that there's a thing between me and the guy, and I'll go into neutral mode. Like I said, I'm very creative, so I probably like to imagine frames. I have so much fun doing that, that I forget where I am now, which is with a man. I should probably be with the kind of guy who pulls me back into reality, because I literally forget about reality. I forget that I'm flirting, even if it's good. I forget about genders. I forget about attraction. I seriously go into my own little world. Chick crack alert, I'm an ENFP, so it's always very tempting for me to imagine how things could be different. I have a natural curiosity: I see, and I imagine how the report could be different: it could go this way or this way or this way. I'm not interested in how it is right now, I want to see what happens. Or sometimes, if I'm chatting a guy up or he's chatting me up, I get way more interested in the subject than the guy. And then later, I'll regret it, because I am interested in the guy. It's like when you send a text, and the girl feels like she has to reply, even if she swore you off or whatever. When I get started on a subject I'm interested in, I have to talk about it. And I always forget what's going on, even if I really want to connect with the guy. Not being grounded in reality is a huge theme with me, I'll admit that.

I don't think I could physically be a Lesbian. I'd be a really bored Lesbian. Unless we just talked all the time, but I'd still be really sexually frustrated.

I need some food, so I'ma eat now.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Backing Off
PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:42 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:30 am
Posts: 126
Quote:
If you ask me (and I know you hang on my every word), the response you get from guys is probably like that emotional/nice guys get from woman. As a guy I'm reading this thinking "hey, this girl is cool, she can break shit down intellectually, and can handle knocks to her self-image in a reflective way, why aren't more girls like this?"

Then I'll chase after the next girl who's like "oh my god stop being such a meany lol"

Just like girls are full of praise for guys who are open and emotional and "wish" more guys were like this. Then throw themselves at guys who have no feelings.
LOL,,, OMGEEE, DICKFACE :P

I literally concluded that I was the female nice guy first, I just hadn't posted it, because I had a longass post, ;D shuddup, lol.

See my reasons, though, they're very surprising. I think it's less the actual people and more the actual game that's flawed. And the way to win is totally rebuild the game. The game, as is, is about the less-fit reproducing in great volume. Not that I don't also want to just work within it and get what I can from that. I'd like stupid guys following me around, it gives me status. People just shouldn't gain value for inherently being the lowest common denominator, which is what the current game does. I blame corporations and the public education system for this mess.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link