| The following is what I learned about the sexual market during my years at high-school. I must have been about twelve years old when I began to formulate these observations. The term “sexual market value” expresses a person’s value for romantic and erotic endeavours. Although there are some abnormalities (some men are attracted to fat women, for instance), in general the term is reliable.
Objective standards of beauty exist although individual preferences may vary. Studies have shown “ugly” children are punished more severely in comparison; also they receive less smiles from parents. From daily experience we already know attractive people win favours more easily and are not as harshly rejected when they mess something up. So let us say that, in this range of the sexual market value, we take a group the size of a school-class, 25 persons. In my years at school this meant the top 5 teens of sexual market value were also the first to explore relationships, love and sex.
The prettiest girls were the first to have boyfriends and the prettiest boys were the first to become sexually active. This was accompanied by a natural, implicit understanding, as if everyone expected this. Then the remainder large group of mediocre sexual market value was to be split up in boys and girls.
If we split the remainder 20 of the group up in 10 boys and 10 girls, with sexual market value 5-6 average out of 10, then I noticed that the girls had these studious attitudes, focusing on classes of bookkeeping and not asking or answering too many questions. Basically they kept their heads low, pretended to have a studious attitude and rejected any approaches by boys.
I knew that the majority of these boys were in the age of beginning to explore romance and sexuality. However the girls blatantly rejected them. A kind of “touchy feely” sexual SPAM developed between the boys. They had no nowhere to go with their urges, and let us just say it was time for them to get girlfriends.
Then at a time, while I was reading works of Plato in the library, two girls sat next to me and began to talk about the guys they liked. They began talking about traits of North-African boys and said how spicy and sensual they were, and how they danced, etc. I looked around in the library and saw the guys doing money calculations with computers. I thought that those guys were the engineers and economists of the future. However I also knew these girls were completely oblivious to them.
I saw one of the girls from the library later at the exit of the school. When I tried to approach her, basically just being kind and asking what was going on, she tilted her head in an arrogant manner and looked past me. I heard the same thing about her from other guys. I figured she was showing how high her standards were, which corresponded with the behaviour of the majority group of girls in the classes. They could easily have formed experimental relationships with the other boys in their range of sexual market value. Instead they chose to ignore them and focus on homework.
Of this same girl, who was so apt to “demonstrate her superior value”, I later heard that she got totally drunk during some R&B party. At a point two black guys managed to have her come on stage, where they took her clothes off. I heard she then lost all inhibitions (possibly because she was wasted) and danced in front of the audience. When I heard this story I realised that each of those studious girls in the group, once they would have made progress with their studies in bookkeeping, would some day around their 18th birthday go to a bar, would get drunk and be totally broken in by some black guy or Moroccan.
Men of this type, meaning labour class, gangster-rap listening immigrants from male-dominated societies, will eventually get these “prissy in public appearance” white girls drunk and make them their total bitches. Because they are treated shittily, some instinct kicks in for these white chicks. They instinctively feel they are working their way up the genetic ladder. Or, more accurately: they are hard-wired to want what they can’t get – their deepest desire is to trade upwards.
Eventually though, they realize this type of guy is getting them nowhere (possibly because he’s locked up in jail or has to borrow money all the time since he is broke from paying alimentation). Then they decide it’s time for them to make the switch from Jamal to Eugene – suddenly the guy who was doing spreadsheets on the library PC is back in the picture. Overwhelmed with joy to finally have a girlfriend, he will literally be her slave. His teenage years of low sexual market value in combination with feminist emancipation rhetoric have already prepared his brain for his role as submissive provider.
This is also exactly the danger of feminist emancipation rhetoric: it teaches women to be independent yet women, by nature, are inclined to trade upwards and find a guy who makes her “work for him”. What a woman says she thinks she wants, is entirely different from what actually triggers a response from her at an emotional level. Their reasoning is according to non sequitur logic. Their true motivations do not come from cognitive reasoning but from deeper and more turmoil emotional layers of their psyche.
My own sexual market value drifted somewhere along average lines. I observed these contradictions and group dynamics very actively and tried to analyse and discuss my findings. Whereas the rest of the group just accepted their positions without taking action or even reflecting upon what was happening. They seemed to identify their fates with their sexual market value even more so than with their intellectual capacities. Even if this fate meant a submissive position. In the peergroup, at the time, and probably later, in society.
A guy chooses a woman he estimates to have a sexual market value roughly equal to his own. Then he will go for it and eventually settle down with her. Whereas women try “to trade upwards”. For instance I am sure that many of those guys who were ignored during their teens still grew up to be decent-looking. I am also positive they went to bars and tried to seduce and pick up women who were below their range of sexual market value. However instead of being welcomed by them, the women in question will have given these guys shit tests. Even though they are uglier than the guys they will still try to make them jump through hoops. Women consider the sexual needs of men as weaknesses and as a means to gain power over them.
A woman wants a guy who is actually a bit above her class. This explains the situation as it existed in the class, the sexual market dynamics that took place there. Men are more realistic; however this sense of realism is used against them.
I learned that it is not healthy for boys around 13 years old to not have access to girlfriends. Deviant forms of sexually, an outlet to urges may arise as a result of this repression. Michel Houellebecq, for instance, describes the situation in Atomised, where sexual harassment takes place in a boys-only boarding school.
To capture everything: among the top 80% of the class of highest sexual market value, an aggressive alpha-male culture emerged. Meaning their discussions were dominated by the superficialities of fashion, about what was hot in some MTV clip, and vulgar jokes about sex. It was a predatory culture, obsessed with their own looks and those of the girls, obsessed with “who is in and who is out”, and using their status to get other kids to do homework for them. More and more of the studious kids stopped studying and instead tried to lift along with this dominant “alpha-male culture”: they feared never to get pussy if they didn’t switch trains.
Hypothesis: in a school of the new society, where humans are prepared for citizenship within the new civilization, we have to apply what I learned. For instance, each month, the director of the school should summon all students, announce a test at the end of the month, and state that the top 10 of students with the best performances will get pussy. It will destroy the negative imagine surrounding higher culture, science and study (because this is given a “nerdy” image by those teens who in today’s society control the sexual market group dynamics). This will eliminate the sexual insecurities and focus the mentality of the teens upon their work. It is to avoid that the sexual market economics distort capable characters from developing themselves.
Last edited by Mr. Marville on Sun Jan 12, 2014 6:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|