HB rating system is stupid.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:55 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 2044
Location: Nottingham, UK
I don't disagree with rating chicks based on their looks, it's just the "HB" part which makes no sense.

If an HB1 is considered butt ugly or deformed, why do we include the HB letters before the number?

I thought HB stands for "hot babe"??


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 4:46 pm
Posts: 1707
Quote:
I don't disagree with rating chicks based on their looks, it's just the "HB" part which makes no sense.

If an HB1 is considered butt ugly or deformed, why do we include the HB letters before the number?

I thought HB stands for "hot babe"??
Actually standard practice is not to use the HB preface for lower numbers but to use UG.
Not that it really matters.

_________________
http://www.joshsway.com -- dating, online dating, fitness, fashion, and more...


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 2044
Location: Nottingham, UK
Ok, I've not heard of UG. I will use that from now on. Thanks.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:10 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 2197
My rating system: "yes" or "no"

The whole community rating system is silly at best.

_________________
Never get broken up with again: the-addiction-formula-never-get-broken- ... 88794.html


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:39 pm 
Offline
The Coach
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:44 am
Posts: 4170
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
My rating system: "yes" or "no"

The whole community rating system is silly at best.

Agreed with this. For me, its either 1 or 0. 1 means yes, 0 means no. Girls could be attractive for different reasons. Sometimes, I don't even know why I am attracted to a girl. If a girl turns me on, then she turns me on. Who gives a fuck what number she is?

Take a look at Tucker Max's Female rating system. I feel it is a bit more effective if you prefer that type of "scale."
Quote:
As an alternative to the “how many beers” or the “1 through 10″ rating system, my friends and I came up with the following 5-star scale to rank physical appearance only. There are three things that you must remember before using this scale:

1) Though personality is very important in evaluating females, in this scale it can only hurt. Too many men are the type that once they start fucking, they think the girl is cool because she likes having sex with them, and want to raise a woman’s rating. This scale is for accuracy of physical appearance only, so keep your feelings for her personality out of this rating. People generally agree more when a woman is a bitch, thus making that more of an objective factor (Personality is obviously important in deciding whether or not you want to date the woman, but not in conveying her physical attractiveness on this scale).

2) Bonus stars can only be given under the following circumstances:

A woman financially supports the man, or at least buys him everything he wants; capped at 1 star.
A woman is into other women, and lets the man participate in some way (including watching); capped at 1 star.
Sex drive can help, but it can only bring a marginal candidate up a level. For instance, a high 2-star can be elevated to a low 3-star, but an average 2-star CANNOT go to a 3-star, no matter what her sexual habits are.
1-star (aka, Common-stock pig): No redeeming qualities. This girl is ugly, usually fat, boring and sucks in just about everyway possible. If you don’t know a common-stock pig when you see one, you are destined to spend the rest of your life with one.

2-star (aka, Respectable pig): One redeeming quality, like large breasts, nice ass, cute face, great dick-sucking lips, etc. If you concentrate on that one redeeming physical quality, and you get shit-housed, you’re not too upset with yourself waking up next to a respectable pig. Of course, you still make her crawl out the window when she leaves, because you don’t want your friends to see her, but at least you don’t want to gargle bleach and scrub yourself like a rape victim after she leaves.

3-star (aka Decent or attractive): Acceptable to be seen with in public. She is average when sober, but looks MUCH better after only about three beers. You’ll admit to your friends that you’re fucking her, but you still make fun of her behind her back, and tell them lies about her sexual prowess and bi-sexual tendencies to justify your dealings with her. She’s not bad overall, and will do if nothing better comes along, but could be left in a heartbeat if the opportunity for a hot chick comes along. Sadly, most guys end up having to settle for a 3-star, as these are the most prevalent type of women.

4-star (aka Girlfriend material): This is the girl that is very attractive, but not super hot. You will be seen with her in public at any point in the day, even before drinking. You think twice before ditching this girl for a hot chick, especially if she has special powers (tongue ring, double jointed, etc.). Ascension to the 4-star level can only be attained through use of a petition. The candidate must secure 75% of the vote from those polled. (NOTE: Bonus points only make a candidate petition eligible. She still must garner 75% of the vote.)

5-star (aka Super hottie): This is the hot chick. Hopefully no further explanation is necessary. It’s kind of like the Hall of Fame. VERY FEW WOMEN ARE 5-STARS, about 5-10% of the population. A declaration that someone is hot is assumed to be true, but can be rebuked if 25% of those polled vote against her 5-star placement.

Other category:

0-star (aka, Wildebeast): The lowest of the low. A 1-star (common-stock pig) with a terrible personality qualifies as a Wildebeast. They should all be put to sleep. This is that loud, disgusting fat girl in the bar that smokes, orders complicated drinks and then spills them on everyone, and is generally just so annoying that you have to actively restrain yourself from kicking her in the crotch and stomping on her throat until she drowns on her own blood. There is no insult too mean or crude for her, and basic human rights do not apply to her.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Posts: 122
Location: In McDonalds
Agreed with Majik on 0 and 1. I believe Mark Manson had that idea mentioned in his book and it's really helpful.

It's disgraceful judging a girl by looks. 0 is a girl you don't find ATTRACTIVE, a 1 is a girl you do find attractive. Helps you see girls for what they are and not just an object/number. Also prevents you putting hotter girls on a pedestal.

_________________
Control your own destiny, you are a genius...

I was featured in Brad's weekly mPUA Forum email for 14/08/15: http://i.imgur.com/Axh5r1D.jpg


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:06 am 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
These acronyms and PUA jargon convey concepts in as few letters as possible. It's just a common experience tool to bond an online community.

Personally, if a woman makes my dick hard, I just sarge for the gusto. My dick never goes wrong. Follow your dick guys and you'll never go wrong. Could be genetics why with some women, it's hard to make our cocks stand at attention while with some, we want to fuck their brains out right then and there.

Instead of those 5 stars or HB10 ratings, we can probably have a hard-dick, limp-dick standard. Something like: limp (L), partially limp (PL), partially hard (PH), hard (H), rock hard (RH), and throbbing rock hard (TRH).

Women are human beings too. Sexually objectifying them as hot or ugly is not cool although I'm okay with it. I really think we should give women proper respect with a more conservative, and decently worded, hard-dick, limp-dick standard.

:twisted:

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:57 pm 
Offline
The Coach
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:44 am
Posts: 4170
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
These acronyms and PUA jargon convey concepts in as few letters as possible. It's just a common experience tool to bond an online community.

Personally, if a woman makes my dick hard, I just sarge for the gusto. My dick never goes wrong. Follow your dick guys and you'll never go wrong. Could be genetics why with some women, it's hard to make our cocks stand at attention while with some, we want to fuck their brains out right then and there.

Instead of those 5 stars or HB10 ratings, we can probably have a hard-dick, limp-dick standard. Something like: limp (L), partially limp (PL), partially hard (PH), hard (H), rock hard (RH), and throbbing rock hard (TRH).

Women are human beings too. Sexually objectifying them as hot or ugly is not cool although I'm okay with it. I really think we should give women proper respect with a more conservative, and decently worded, hard-dick, limp-dick standard.

:twisted:
Hellhound, the reason I think I like your posts so much is just because you are one horny man. And that is the way it should be... Man to woman. Don't let other people tell you what you think is attractive. Have your own opinion.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link