INDIRECT OPENERS OR DIRECT OPENERS? WHICH DO YOU PREFER AND WHY?

In the grand scheme of things, Opening isn't shit. Opening WON'T get you laid, it's the seduction that comes after that will, so you don't even need to worry about what you say at first. But here's what I prefer.

Direct>Situational>Indirect.

Why? Well I used to think Indirect was better, I really did. But the more comfortable you become around women the more you realize that it doesn't matter what you say. As long as you hit a few key points of attraction she'll want your dick so why take the long way to get there? Let her know you're intrested in her sexually from the start and you pass a lot of the social bullshit.

The fact is that little movements with big impact are better than long, drawn out and pre-planned scripts. Women LIKE ballsy men, they're looking for the Alpha males out there. The men with incredible confidence and the ability to take charge and lead.

So if you got it, flaunt it.

If you're a cripple when it comes to talking with women however, start with a few scripted lines(Indirect). See if you spontaneously combust or an arm and a leg falls off after speaking with a cute girl. If neither of those happen, then you'll be one step closer to have built great confidence in yourself

-balls to the wall,

Syx

_________________
Two words: Carpe Diem

The opener does NOT matter, at all.

One guy could open a girl by asking for the time - and end up fucking her. Whilst another could ask the same girl for the time, and end up nowhere with her.

Now does this mean you don't show her your true intentions?

Hell no!

Be direct on a verbal level. Be sexual through your non-verbal communication. Be honest with her.

But don't say something because it's what 'some guy' on the internet told you to say - say it because that's what you truly want to say in that moment.

Stay congruent with your thoughts, words and actions.

If you think she's hot, tell her you think she's hot.

Keep it simple.

-Zak