1. The more beautiful a woman is,the more likely she is difficult and bitchy
2. Women will always choose looks as opposed to game
3. If A Woman Is Of Higher Value Than You, She Is Not Allowed To Be Attracted To You.
4. Direct game as opposed to indirect is it a numbers game ? Which has the highest results in closes?
5. Is pick dehumanizing to a women or possibly flattering ?
6. You need to be qualified first by the girl, by showing her "what makes you special", and THEN qualify her..
7. Are shits tests the creation of challenging cocky funny remarks and weird behavior?

So yeah guys I'm on a lil quest her to solve these , now my infields will also be apart of this topic , and would be great to speed me up with my findings from ur infields ( please no key board jockeys. And/or trolls) , my next posts will be with in this week on the 1st myth. Just to avoid us all trying to earn bragging rights please post a short synopsis of ur infield stating the reason to ur perspective and experience.

Tallk soon

1. NO to bitchy, yes to difficult, she is higher value, she gets hit on by more higher value men, so of course she is going to be hard to game if you cannot demonstrate high enough value; her threshold is way higher than that of other woman because she can allow it to be.
2. NO. Women will obviously choose looks AND game over game with no looks, but honestly, this point doesn't matter at all. The fact that good looking guys can get girls with no effort is irrelevant. What is relevant is that not good looking guys can get hot girls also.
3. Not allowed? Women evaluate value in many ways, so this may kinda be true but is a worthless generalization because every woman assess value totally differently.
4. Whatever fits your style better. I prefer indirect game because I am good at coming up with witty side remarks and am good at butting into a conversation that women are having in a funny way. Other guys prefer direct game
5. Flattering in general, or creepy
6. Who knows, pick up works in so many different ways. In general this is probably true though the whole 'qualifying her' is not nearly as important as you think. If she is into you, you don't need to qualify her.
7. Some yes, some no. Some shit tests are girls trying to tell you to fuck off, other shit tests are girls basically making it easy for you to game them, they are basically saying, "HERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO IMPRESS ME BY NOT BEING A TOTAL CHODE WITH YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS QUESTION" take advantage.

_________________
http://www.joshsway.com -- dating, online dating, fitness, fashion, and more...

Hey there thanks for the reply
U sure make relevant points but
2. Its looks vs game just so u know its one or the other my "infield" test up in this weak is to do the caveman challenge jesus fk its gonna suck haha but I'm gonna see the relevance of the two and post it
4. Now I do direct, and which is very effective for quick results but comes with rejection , I'm not talking about " hey let's fuck" but more to social norms "ur cute I had to meet u what's ur name" like sure I used the mm module after that but results are a lot quicker I'm talking about a number close in 5 min or less but with indirect its slower up to a few hours or so , but with less rejection, so what I wanna know is ;as there is a rumor out ,that if its a numbers game which may
very well be true which method is effective as indirect makes use of gaining her interest,, direct being that attraction is reciprocated.
7.But the myth here is do we cause her to dish out shit tests towards us based on weird behavior and challenging remarks , for instance A.) were challenging weird etc which causes B.) A shit test C.) We over come the shit test and pass with a witty funny remark or neg, but if we simply avoid A.) We wouldn't get a shit so there for B.) And C.) Are only relevant , so what I wanna get out of this is what are we doing wrong that create shit tests for ourselves and on a side note a girl who u attracted in the beginning (by a direct approach won't shit test u, honest to god on this , if she's into u why would she make it harder for u to make a connection other than investment of the situation? Share ur thoughts ?

O just with doing an indirect method ur goal is to attract and makes use of manipulation and u with ur relevant knowledge will notice that body language is a difficult thing to hide , and girls are very accurate in noticing these subtle cues so incongruent behavior may lead to shit tests (as ur true self always comes through) , but what I've noticed with direct is there are no shit tests well that is if u approach ryt ur in other that its pretty merry, also the community tells us to be alpha what's so alpha about masking ur intentions?