Quote:
Standing with your buddies hoping a girl will notice you is wasting valuable club time. The best and simplest method is to approach the girl, 90% of guys won't. On very rare occasions there will be a super hot girl you have your eyes on and she's surrounded by uber-cockblockers and gentlemen of...shall we say...robust build. Approaching then exhibits a very strong alpha frame but can go seriously wrong unless your game is wired super tight. A very advanced method is called the "limbic resonance technique" and basically you're using unconscious triggers to activate the girls reticular activation system. The RAS is taking in signals from the outside world and routing them either to the conscious brain (the frontal lobes) or the unconscious brain (the amygdala).
Consider this: You're stood in a noisy bar talking to your friend and above all the noise you hear your name spoken 20 feet away. Why? Your amygdala has received a signal that something important has happened and nudges your conscious and you become aware of it. Well the same occurs with visual signals and the best method for you to get a girl to notice you unconsciously then consciously is to do what the NLP crowd call "Matching and mirroring" Basically you copy the girls movement, posture and gestures with you standing in her peripheral vision. (girls have wider peripheral vision than guys so stand slightly farther back than you would think) Keep at it very subtly and it will work and the girl will approach you due to her brain hardwiring creating an unconscious connection. When she does greet her with the words "What took you so long"

No offense to you mate, but this sounds like pseudoscience. Really dude? Did you throw a bunch of girls in to an fMRI machine and scan their Amygdala under under controlled conditions with your claim as the variable?
A 5 second wikipedia search gives 4 peer reviewed articles that debunk NLP:
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ppb.201 ... 0008-0.xml
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=sea ... -11411-001
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... aintenance
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... aintenance
I've taken a couple classes on cognitive psychology, and I can tell you its a dark, confused forest, and there's little science there. Everyone has a theory for everything, and for every one dude with a model about a particular aspect of your memory, or cognition, there are 3 other dudes with their own, contradicting models. Every single model you'll see in psychology makes predictions which have been contradicted by experiment. Don't believe anything you hear about the mind unless its from a neuroscientist or a Neurologist MD. Even so, they'll tell you very little, because we don't really know jack about the human mind, so psychologists and "social workers", and other various pseudo-intellectuals try to make up elaborate models that explain some of what we know, and then fail spectacularly in their predictions when put to the test.
The reason NLP works for PUAs is the same reason a sugar pill works for pain patients. If they don't know its a sugar pill, they think its medicine. It's all in your mind, but in the end, it still helps your game.
You'll say that the fact that it helps validates it. I'll say that I could come up with any number of arbitrary techniques and theories of pickup, and if I sell them well, and convince people that they are legitimate, then people will actually see an improvement in their game, even though when I made my techniques up, they had nothing to do with reality.