Quote:
You guys are awesome. I'm no longer going to attempt to get you too review the fr of anybody that has seen me in action. I will say this though, if she doesn't WANT to sleep with you in 30 to 60 minutes. if she isn't hotter for you than a fat man in July, then you aren't doing it right. eff number closes and d2's your seduction should be about complete at that point. all she needs is a location.
the next thing I post here will be infield recordings, because you guys can't even wrap your minds around the concepts.
Nobody here WANTS you to be wrong, dude. Why would we WANT it to be impossible to sleep with a girl 30 minutes after meeting her? What you're doing is the equivalent of a guy coming to a flight enthusiast forum and claiming you can fly by flapping your arms. A bit less extreme, but you get the idea.
I'm a gym/weight lifting junkie for 7 years counting, and every time I see a "GAIN 700% MORE MUSCLE MASS" ad I don't even bother proving why its BS anymore. Before, I'd actually run a full background check on the company, product, chemical, and scour pubmed for fulltext controlled studies, pore over the data and funding sources, conflicts of interests, systematic error, etc etc etc. Every single time, every supplement proved to be snake oil. I don't even bother anymore, because what's the point? Every single claim before has been wrong, and my time isn't worth the miniscule chance that some supplement comes out and actually makes you a tad big stronger.
The problem with PU claims, is that there is no pubmed database for controlled PUA studies, just some field reports from non-randomized, non-pre selected guys with preconceived notions and biases. Therefore, you can't blame us for being just a tad bit skeptical of your claim. By all means post whatever you think helps make your case, but don't be offended if we are skeptical.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.