WTF is pick up turning in to?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:23 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:15 pm
Posts: 858
Quote:
You're a trip. The fact that u think I'm at home in my basement typing all this means you're a dellusional f bomb.
If you would be going out on a regular basis at least 2 times each week and doing more than 20 sets each week..you would cleary realise that you're focusing on something that it's not important. How many times you get rejected is really not important at all. Both guys got laid at the end of the night. Same results different methods. EVERY GOOD PLAYER KNOWS REJECTION IS JUST A PART OF THE GAME. Because your focusing so much on rejection when your talking..I'm 95% sure you're not having the experience in field that you're supposed to have. This is not rocket science..it's something anyone with more than 200 approaches realizes. Go out, stop reading and stop CREATING %%. Stop creating imaginary statistics..

_________________
Greatness is never borned


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 12:05 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:45 am
Posts: 95
ICQ: 440410367
I really don't understand why you guys care about ratio so much. I'm a pretty attractive guy and if I cared about a 80+% success rate I would go after ugly girls. I won't go after girls I find unattractive or even average to be honest. I am narcissistic and I know the way a girl looks doesn't mean how easy it's going to be to get her but overall speaking usually average or worse are infact easier and if having a 80-100% success rate would mean going mainly after these girls than I'm out. I'll take my 2 out of 10 as long as their going to be 10 times more attractive than the 10 ugly girls you have sex with just because your ratio is going to be good.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Hi
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 365
Location: Birmingham
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cyrano De Begerac. Based on historical character. I am not this guy, but he is a good example for those of us who wish to be manly and a seducer at the same time. Yes manly men will refuse to be metrosexual even if it gets more f closes.

U obviously value the advice from women PU guru's. Which is something that I find disgusting. It is clear u r a indirect guy. I am not against your style, but u will fail to convince some.

I have to say that not everyone has the same goals in mind in what they want to achieve and how they want to achive it.
I'll let you in on a secret, I am a fighter, I've taken part in no-gi matches, MMA, knockdown and FMA. There are plenty of people who do what I do better than me but I train almost everyday and compete relatively regularly and as such I have a reasonable understanding of the psychology that makes a fighter. And such I see little cross-over between "great fighters" and "great seducers".

Now I can see how the two practises might have crossed over at certain points in history and how that kind of high adrenaline activity can woo girls but I don't think there is anything essential in the nature of violence that cross's over to seduction. I know plenty of fighters who aren't pullers and I know plenty of pullers who can't fight for shit. Case in point, Byron and Casanova...

And as far as I know, AFC Adam isn't a "fighter" either.
U have described urself as having both qualities. However aggressiveness and dominance is not the same thing, u can be a mma foot soldier, u r not a street fighter, so u r not telling me much. Acts lf heroism are similar to romantic courage.

If u r indirect u r not risking anything. U r not taking any of the risks that u do in the ring, for fear of humuliation. U r incongruently alpha. I have flaws but I am not in denial

If u want dominance think of Don King or a pimp. I m not talking about nice people but it is clear they are in control.

Being In Direct I do not doubt that u r a nice guy.

_________________
Meet and Wing.

direct-game-birmingham-friends-that-wil ... 30930.html

The Jackal an Introduction.
[link]

The Field Reports.
[link]

The Lay Reports.
[link]


Last edited by JACKAL RONIN J000 on Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:05 am
Posts: 642
Ok to sum it up this OP tried to be direct got rejected a lot and saw that as failure.

What he fails to realizes is even if he had been Indirect with those same women he would have failed just the same. The rejection might not have been as abrupt as a direct approach he would have probably got some small talk but ultimately he would have still gotten rejected just a longer more frustrating process.

Another thing i see his direct game is based of 60YOC. 60's decent but he doesn't lay the ground work toughing your spine for all the criticism you're going to recieve from women for being direct. But "Mode One does

It's foolish to believe you're going to get 85% of the women you approach just because you have good game. Some girls won't like you no matter how good your so called game is.

_________________
Friendzone 1-vt51424.html?postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Hi
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:07 pm
Posts: 88
Quote:
U have described urself as having both qualities. However aggressiveness and dominance is not the same thing, u can be a mma foot soldier, u r not a street fighter, so u r not telling me much. Acts lf heroism are similar to romantic courage.

If u r indirect u r not risking anything. U r not taking any of the risks that u do in the ring, for fear of humuliation. U r incongruently alpha. I have flaws but I am not in denial

If u want dominance think of Don King or a pimp. I m not talking about nice people but it is clear they are in control.

Being In Direct I do not doubt that u r a nice guy.
Who said my game was indirect?
-----

I will say in their defence however that indirect guys DO risk rejection.


They simply don't risk the same KIND of rejection. However, to say that if you are un-afraid of one activity you will be un-afraid of another doesn't make any sense. People fear different things on different levels. There are sky-divers who freak out at spiders, and successful PUAs who don't like fighting.

I think you'll find as life goes on, that in the western world at least, it pays to be nice -within reason-.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:48 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:17 pm
Posts: 871
FOOLISH, DELUSIONAL, NO MAN CAN GET 85% OF WOMEN HE APPROACHES........blah blah blah. REJECTION IS A PART OF PICK UP, DON'T BE AFRAID OF IT< EMBRACE IT! blah blah blah.

This is all the mentality of the pick up monkey, not that of the pick up artist. 85% is more then possible. If you are above average looking and are an artist rather then a pick up monkey. If you are going into an approach with the mind set that it's ok to get rejected, i'll just go up to 10 other girls, eventually one will give in, and even if there isn't one, hey at least I am learning something.

What are you learning, how to get rejected, what type of women will typically reject you? Play the numbers game and yes, you may get laid. Get used to rejection and yes it will not be so bad when it happens. Accept it as a certainty in the art of seduction, and you will NEVER become a true pick up artist.

If you are approaching random women without any reads, or without creating attraction and without having created the image of being a desirable man, then yes, 85% will be impossible.

Seduction is not about approaching random women and attempting to talk their panties off. I't can be a form of it, but this is a recipe to failure. You don't know if the girl is even attracted to you, you don't know if she has a boyfriend, a girlfriend, husband, hates men. Doesn't like your style...etc etc.


Women are emotion based, they wear their hearts on their sleeves, if you know the signs, they will basically pick you up. All you have to do is play the game.

Anyways this is something I feel needs to be addressed. I will be writing a well detailed post explaining how 85% and above is more then possible. I will write it within the next few days, I don't have the time at the moment.

I have had that ratio for years, It's not something anyone can do, but it is very very possible, with the right skill set, style, posture, attitude and looks.

_________________
Seduce their mind and the rest will follow.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 6:11 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:54 pm
Posts: 373
See why most people get rejected using 60s is because they escalate really freaking fast. Thing is even if you're really good looking guy like me you will get rejected by a lot of women for escalating too fast.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:14 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:47 am
Posts: 233
the thing with rejection is that you shouldn't ignore it. You should analyze what happened and why, then make sure it doesn't happen again. If you just ignore it you will keep making the same mistake again.

That's like me taking a test, failing it... I get offered a re-take... I ignore my initial fail so I don't study for my retake... and I fail it again. Yes there will be other tests that you will be able to Ace, but why limit my odds? Why would I set a limiter on my seduction skills. Fuck! Why would I set a limiter on any of my skills? I want to be constantly improving my skills, especially something that I'm into. (And there's always room for improvement. Nobody is perfect)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Hi
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 365
Location: Birmingham
Quote:
Quote:
U have described urself as having both qualities. However aggressiveness and dominance is not the same thing, u can be a mma foot soldier, u r not a street fighter, so u r not telling me much. Acts lf heroism are similar to romantic courage.

If u r indirect u r not risking anything. U r not taking any of the risks that u do in the ring, for fear of humuliation. U r incongruently alpha. I have flaws but I am not in denial

If u want dominance think of Don King or a pimp. I m not talking about nice people but it is clear they are in control.

Being In Direct I do not doubt that u r a nice guy.
Who said my game was indirect?
-----

I will say in their defence however that indirect guys DO risk rejection.


They simply don't risk the same KIND of rejection. However, to say that if you are un-afraid of one activity you will be un-afraid of another doesn't make any sense. People fear different things on different levels. There are sky-divers who freak out at spiders, and successful PUAs who don't like fighting.

I think you'll find as life goes on, that in the western world at least, it pays to be nice -within reason-.
If u r unafriad in one activity u should have the desire to not be unafraid in others, otherwise u r liimiting urself. The template is already is in your brain.

Stelar using his direct version is risking his life and limb. Indirect guys can turn around and say "hey I was only asking an opinion.

_________________
Meet and Wing.

direct-game-birmingham-friends-that-wil ... 30930.html

The Jackal an Introduction.
[link]

The Field Reports.
[link]

The Lay Reports.
[link]


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline
The name of the mothefucking game
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 4210
Website: http://www.dancefloorseduction.com
Location: South Florida
Quote:
FOOLISH, DELUSIONAL, NO MAN CAN GET 85% OF WOMEN HE APPROACHES........blah blah blah. REJECTION IS A PART OF PICK UP, DON'T BE AFRAID OF IT< EMBRACE IT! blah blah blah.

This is all the mentality of the pick up monkey, not that of the pick up artist. 85% is more then possible. If you are above average looking and are an artist rather then a pick up monkey. If you are going into an approach with the mind set that it's ok to get rejected, i'll just go up to 10 other girls, eventually one will give in, and even if there isn't one, hey at least I am learning something.

What are you learning, how to get rejected, what type of women will typically reject you? Play the numbers game and yes, you may get laid. Get used to rejection and yes it will not be so bad when it happens. Accept it as a certainty in the art of seduction, and you will NEVER become a true pick up artist.

If you are approaching random women without any reads, or without creating attraction and without having created the image of being a desirable man, then yes, 85% will be impossible.

Seduction is not about approaching random women and attempting to talk their panties off. I't can be a form of it, but this is a recipe to failure. You don't know if the girl is even attracted to you, you don't know if she has a boyfriend, a girlfriend, husband, hates men. Doesn't like your style...etc etc.


Women are emotion based, they wear their hearts on their sleeves, if you know the signs, they will basically pick you up. All you have to do is play the game.

Anyways this is something I feel needs to be addressed. I will be writing a well detailed post explaining how 85% and above is more then possible. I will write it within the next few days, I don't have the time at the moment.

I have had that ratio for years, It's not something anyone can do, but it is very very possible, with the right skill set, style, posture, attitude and looks.
^good, that is what i said and how it should be 4 pages back:
Quote:
85% can be achieved by a dude like sex addict since he approaches the ladies he identify base on experience, analysis etc... That are gonna close...Not by going to random women(key point)... This is so funny all of you are arguing and saying the same thing, but you guys don't know it...

_________________
Learn the proper way to maximize your results in a dancefloor/club environment, check out my blog and youtube channel:
http://www.dancefloorseduction.com

Dancefloor/Club game youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/dancefloorseduction


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline
The name of the mothefucking game
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 4210
Website: http://www.dancefloorseduction.com
Location: South Florida
Quote:
the thing with rejection is that you shouldn't ignore it. You should analyze what happened and why, then make sure it doesn't happen again. If you just ignore it you will keep making the same mistake again.

That's like me taking a test, failing it... I get offered a re-take... I ignore my initial fail so I don't study for my retake... and I fail it again. Yes there will be other tests that you will be able to Ace, but why limit my odds? Why would I set a limiter on my seduction skills. Fuck! Why would I set a limiter on any of my skills? I want to be constantly improving my skills, especially something that I'm into. (And there's always room for improvement. Nobody is perfect)

^ a lot of the times you do not make any mistakes and you still get rejected...

_________________
Learn the proper way to maximize your results in a dancefloor/club environment, check out my blog and youtube channel:
http://www.dancefloorseduction.com

Dancefloor/Club game youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/dancefloorseduction


Top
   
 Post subject: Hi
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 365
Location: Birmingham
A girl would never publicly admit that she rejected a guy because she thought he was ugly. She will just say he was creepy. I agree with Skills.

I don't know of any ulgy guys who are players. If Ross Jeffries has even slept with one women I would call that a success.

I have to say I have seen ugly guys with grooming look good, but most ugly guys feel it won't make a difference so do not bother.

_________________
Meet and Wing.

direct-game-birmingham-friends-that-wil ... 30930.html

The Jackal an Introduction.
[link]

The Field Reports.
[link]

The Lay Reports.
[link]


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Hi
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
Quote:
I don't know of any ulgy guys who are players. If Ross Jeffries has even slept with one women I would call that a success.
Not sure of your definition of ugly but this guy isn't good looking either, here: http://justinwaynepua.com/category/just ... y-reports/ :twisted:

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:47 am
Posts: 233
Quote:
Quote:
the thing with rejection is that you shouldn't ignore it. You should analyze what happened and why, then make sure it doesn't happen again. If you just ignore it you will keep making the same mistake again.

That's like me taking a test, failing it... I get offered a re-take... I ignore my initial fail so I don't study for my retake... and I fail it again. Yes there will be other tests that you will be able to Ace, but why limit my odds? Why would I set a limiter on my seduction skills. Fuck! Why would I set a limiter on any of my skills? I want to be constantly improving my skills, especially something that I'm into. (And there's always room for improvement. Nobody is perfect)

^ a lot of the times you do not make any mistakes and you still get rejected...
“Champions know that success is inevitable; that there is no such thing as failure, only feedback. They know that the best way to forecast the future is to create it."


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:37 am
Posts: 1043
Location: Hungary, Pécs
Oh please...not again...the same shit over again.

Here we have in the red corner: The naturals. They generally don't give a fuck about being rejected if in the end they get laid, so they prefer to run the numbers game, whose correct definition was already mentioned(the magic number stuff)

And here in the blue corner: The Methodists. They try working on minimizing rejection rate, playing mind games, and use general psychology to achieve their goal.

The result: Both team has winners eg.: Cajun, Style, Sixty, Vin Dicarlo. Both team has failures: guys stuck in the friendzone(team MM), guys who get rejected every time they go direct (team natural). Probably for the "losers", switching team will help, probably won't. Depends whether it was just an issue of congruence or a completely wrong attitude towards women.

Now team MM can go on all day about having better success rate, it just doesn't matter to naturals, they don't give a fuck about success rate. Naturals can go on all day about rejection not being important, the fans of MM just don't like to be rejected and that's all.

Rather than comparing the success rate of the methods, may I suggest a SATISFACTION rate instead. How well each team is satisfied with their own method, because I think this is what really matters. You're basically as happy with your life as satisfied you are with it. And I believe that we wouldn't really find statistically significant difference here, so even if I know it won't happen, I kindly ask everyone to stop this completely pointless argument...

_________________
"Bros before hoes"

Relationship guide: extended-relationship-guide-vt170687.html

http://wayoftheplayer.com/become-a-player/instinct


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 146 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link