| Offline | | Black Belt |  | Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:03 am Posts: 385 | The answer is maybe.
But learning about them is definitely in one's best interests.
The study of Psychopathy is not given enough attention. Most would not be able to accurately describe a psychopath, let alone be able to identify one or understand how one operates. They are prevalent in and destructive to all societies yet even psychology students are not taught about their influence. It's really up to the individual to inform themselves.
The biggest misunderstandings are usually; what type of person could constitute a psychopath, how their behaviors appear to others and what their level of integration is amongst civilized society. I say civilized because the general consensus is that psychopaths are limited to petty criminals, violent thugs, and people with antisocial personality disorders. This is simply not true. Psychopaths have no conscience, but this does not prevent them from being extremely intelligent, successful or powerful.
They comprise 4% of the population (close to the % of gay males in the US). So depending on your lifestyle you could come into contact with at least one everyday. The degree to which they can directly impact someone's life depends on the level of interaction. They could be the person that serves you coffee or they could be a close family member or spouse.
Martha Stout, who has worked extensively with victims of psychopaths, writes:
Imagine - if you can - not having a conscience, none at all, no feelings of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no limiting sense of concern for the well-being of strangers, friends, or even family members. Imagine no struggles with shame, not a single one in your whole life, no matter what kind of selfish, lazy, harmful, or immoral action you had taken. And pretend that the concept of responsibility is unknown to you, except as a burden others seem to accept without question, like gullible fools. Now add to this strange fantasy the ability to conceal from other people that your psychological makeup is radically different from theirs. Since everyone simply assumes that conscience is universal among human beings, hiding the fact that you are conscience-free is nearly effortless. You are not held back from any of your desires by guilt or shame, and you are never confronted by others for your coldbloodedness. The ice water in your veins is so bizarre, so completely outside of their personal experience, that they seldom even guess at your condition.
In other words, you are completely free of internal restraints, and your unhampered liberty to do just as you please, with no pangs of conscience, is conveniently invisible to the world. You can do anything at all, and still your strange advantage over the majority of people, who are kept in line by their consciences will most likely remain undiscovered.
How will you live your life? What will you do with your huge and secret advantage, and with the corresponding handicap of other people (conscience)? The answer will depend largely on just what your desires happen to be, because people are not all the same. Even the profoundly unscrupulous are not all the same. Some people - whether they have a conscience or not - favor the ease of inertia, while others are filled with dreams and wild ambitions. Some human beings are brilliant and talented, some are dullwitted, and most, conscience or not, are somewhere in between. There are violent people and nonviolent ones, individuals who are motivated by blood lust and those who have no such appetites. [...] Provided you are not forcibly stopped, you can do anything at all.
Stout also discusses the fact that psychopaths, like anyone else, are born with different basic likes and dislikes and desires, which is why some of them are doctors and presidents and others are petty thieves or rapists. “Likeable”, “Charming”, “Intelligent”, “Alert”, “Impressive”, “Confidence-inspiring,” and “A great success with the ladies”. This is how Hervey Cleckley described most of his subjects in The Mask of Sanity. It seems that, in spite of the fact that their actions prove them to be “irresponsible” and “self-destructive”, psychopaths seem to have in abundance the very traits most desired by normal persons. The smooth self-assurance acts as an almost supernatural magnet to normal people who have to read self-help books or go to counseling to be able to interact with others in an untroubled way. The psychopath, on the contrary, never has any neuroses, no self-doubts, never experiences angst, and is what “normal” people seek to be. What’s more, even if they aren’t that attractive, they are “babe magnets”.
Cleckley's seminal hypothesis is that the psychopath suffers from profound and incurable affective deficit. If he really feels anything at all, they are emotions of only the shallowest kind. He is able to do whatever he wants, based on whatever whim strikes him, because consequences that would fill the ordinary man with shame, self-loathing, and embarrassment simply do not affect the psychopath at all. What to others would be a horror or a disaster is to him merely a fleeting inconvenience. Cleckley posits that psychopathy is quite common in the community at large. His cases include examples of psychopaths who generally function normally in the community as businessmen, doctors, and even psychiatrists. Nowadays, some of the more astute researchers see criminal psychopathy - often referred to as antisocial personality disorder - as an extreme of a particular personality type. I think it is more helpful to characterize criminal psychopaths as “unsuccessful psychopaths”.
So this is how Psychopathy relates to Game. If you had literally zero fear of rejection or embarrassment when hitting on a woman, you would be incredibly productive and successful.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... Brown.html
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... williamson
I'm not suggesting becoming a psychopath to sleep with more women, and I'm not saying that all guys who are good with women are psychopaths. But the sad truth is that many are, and it seems mimicking their traits will get you results. Use at your own discretion. This is more so a warning to be aware of such individuals who purposefully wreak havoc and have no concerns inflicting pain and suffering onto others. They are surprisingly common and simply a different type of human. A deeper understanding will help you to clearly interpret specific situations where there has been no logical explanation as to how someone could act in a certain way.
If you cannot understand how some people can do some seriously twisted things, then congratulations you have a conscience.
If you do not have a conscience and think that you may be a psychopath, then congratulations you are arguably a more efficient human.
And no doubt a hit with the ladies.
|
|