I'll look at it again when the Vicodin wears off.

Fuckin a man, preciate it a ton. I just noticed I stopped bantering back with her before creating this thread towards the end which I didn't happen to put up on here. For example, we'd talk and all, she'd be saying things..I'd get the urge to say something back, but nah. Then I posted a funny youtube vid on her wall with a comedian talking about if old people talk dirty. She commented on it and was like, "Take notes haha" I didn't reply. I do see what you mean about seeing them as "inferior". They're just like cute little creates who don't need strength because they've always been protected by us but they still long for excitement so they use drama to get it.

In English class at uni, we were talking about the sexes. I'm like, "The female sex is dramatic." All girls looked at me. The teacher was like, "All females?" I say, "Everyone of them." He asks me to explain so I say, "Well think about it. A guy is different. The man just wants to open up a beer, sit back in his sofa with the boys and watch some football." The guys in the classroom started laughing and saying things like, "Damn dude, amen to that!" The teacher had the look on his face of, "Jesus, this guy is thinking." I kept going on saying things like, "..We are a generation raised by women. The divorce rates are so much higher nowadays. In stories and movies of the past, the hero was a man and his prize was a woman. Now we have movies like Twilight where the woman chooses between multiple men. This isn't multiple choice."

_________________
Don't get on one knee for a girl that won't get on two for you.

Truly amen to that!

By the way, you should have used Fuze argument. We have been the dominant gender for all time.

I definitely gonna start trying not to banter with them. I always get in a discussion and in 95% of time I end up winning the argument and getting the girl pissed off. If I simply ignore them, they will have a felling ( false feeling xD) that they are right and will be a much more nice e cute person. Easy prey.
Yeah man, wtf? lol, this isnt right.

It's not morally wrong to say it, just politically incorrect. Btw, matriarchy lasted a lot longer then patriarchy, but it's not my intention to argue your point, because it's valid. Let's just not forget it was patriarchy who put women into the position they find themselves in today. In a modern western society based on judeo-christian tradition, the survival of such society depends on partial or total submission of the female. That's why everything is on a verge of a breakdown, because women are taking their submissive roles to a much lesser extent. A total liberation of women would inevitably lead to the crash of the system which would be replaced by a different model. However, the long lasting effects of centuries of patriarchy have been ingrained in women and this order may seem natural, although it is in reality socially conditioned. This doesn't matter because the outcome is the same. This order has put women into the position they need to find their identity through bondage with a male. Even to this day, but to a much greater extent in the past, single women couldn't enjoy the liberties and status married women got. In 19th and early 20th century it was inconceivable for a single woman to smoke or play cards, but married women had such privileges, for example (a trivial example). Now, consider the implications of what this means for a women. Males require purity in a potential mate, the result of which is a dense and sinful meaning connected with sex and sexual pleasure for women - hence the myth, women don't enjoy sex. On the other hand, male natural tendency to spread his seed is a great obstacle for women to bond long term to get their identity and secure their offspring. The result of this is the woman you have today. Patriarchy forced women to use all sorts of tricks and manipulation to survive. It's an ingrained survival instinct, play along the purity myth - hard to get, and bond a male in such a way he cannot leave, try to instill the illusion of scarcity. The problem is, times have changed and the instinct stayed.
So I don't view women as "less", they're in fact much stronger considering the circumstances in which they had to survive (patriarchy). I view them as these amazing, powerful, instinctive creatures with one and the same flaw - they're the victims of the system (just as modern males who strive for 50-50 relationships are). Women, in my eyes, are like a key to infinite power which you have to know how to use or it could backfire. Just think of all the women who sacrifice everything for their mate and offspring. It is really easily forgotten here on the forum there are many more such women than the "bitches".
Unfortunately, the system has done the damage already and the result is the fucked up world of male-female interactions where guys need to act a certain way to provoke the side of this female survival instinct they can use to their advantage. Shit happens, it's the way it is. I wished for a long time it wouldn't have to be this way and wondered why does it have to be a fucking battle instead of a partnership. I still hope that it doesn't, but I accept the fact it's probably just my ideal.
And just another thought, this unhealthy male-female dynamic could very well be the root and the basis of all exploitation. What a fucked up world.

_________________
rAFC and yes, I'm a chick.

I have bursts of being a lady, but it doesn't last long.

It really should not be a battle, but it is, and it is not going to change anytime soon. We might as well adapt to it. And i believe that a partnership IS the ultimate goal of a long term relantioship.

In any case, always good to have a different point of view. It is by questioning that we grow.