So if a guy is below average height all he has to do is move to europe, make a fuckton of money and get a tan? Holy shit, I've been doing it all wrong. I spent all these years developing my social skills and overcoming my problems and all I had to do was make a shitload of money. But seriously, if you came into a lair and said something like this you'd be laughed out of there. Don't come on here and try to put bullshit like this in people's heads, these are exactly the kind of sociological ideas we're trying to get rid of. You'll be telling us to buy girls drinks, bring them flowers and take them on dinner dates next.

Power is an aphrodisiac, of course, but to assume that money is the only source of power is riiculous. I'm usually very modest when it comes to this but your ideas need to be put in their place... I can go out at the weekend with £30, which will buy me a few drinks and a taxi to her place (and leave me with more than enough change to get home the next day). I have maybe 4 or 5 drinks, have fun with the guys for a while then pull a girl home with me within a short time of meeting her. And get this! I have no car, no actual job and I am still living with my mother at the age of 22. Girls want a man with money? Bullshit. Girls want a man who makes her feel like a woman.

As for the original poster, there is no 'best' method. I see guys asking this all the time, they want to know the best method so they can use it. They want a quick fix and it doesn't work that way. I started with David DeAngelo's DYD stuff and noticed that a friend of mine was a natural with a C&F attitude towards women, so I decided to model my behaviour on him to see how women reacted to it. Then I discovered The Game and from there I looked into the Mystery Method, however I found myself over analysing situations and it was holding me back. So, I took a more relaxed attitude towards it and after a while I was getting results, but not nearly as many as I wanted. I decided to look into other methods and came across stuff by Swingcat, read the book of pook, and a bunch of other stuff... but to me it was all the same and I wanted faster results, a method that suited my personality better. Not to blow my own trumpet here but I've ways had balls and would do crazy shit that got me into trouble, I didn't fear people... so I wanted something a bit more out there that I could have some real fun with. And then I discovered David X, Badboy, Gunwitch, the mode one principles, the apocalypse opener... and I started experimenting with all that stuff.

I have integrated certain aspects of each method together into a style which suits me, my personality and my personal needs. If you watch me in action you'll see elements of C&F, neg theory and push/pull, and of course the good old false time constraint is a fond friend of mine. But I hate indirect stuff. I hate all the openers and canned routines and the structure of it all, it's linear and predictable and quite frankly I find it boring. That's why I wasn't overly successful with the mystery method; I wasn't invested enough in it for it to work for me. What I'm saying to you is, read up on some stuff, if you like the sound of it and know you can do it then go out and use it and see how it works for you, take note of the aspects which work and those which don't, and set about finding ways to patch those areas up. It took me 4 years to get where I am right now and it could take you a long time aswell, but let me tell you something - it is fucking worth it.

Go read the juggler method. It is harder than the MM, but for me, this is way better.

_________________
Kaptein, Span die seile