Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
| Author | Message |
| tyranis19 | PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:47 pm | |
| Offline | | New to MPUA Forum |
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:01 pm
Posts: 14
Location: south africa | | which is more effective in your oppinion? i have looked at both and each make extreamly good points and come up with some great things to try but is one really better or is it best to try and merge the two strains of thought in to one. what do you thing?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Sparroww | PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:50 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Zealot |
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:38 pm
Posts: 332
Website: http://www.sparrowwslair.wordpress.com
Location: Minneapolis, MN | | Your preference. Peacocking works, I prefer stealth attraction though. Peacocking just isn't really my style. Like a lot of stuff in pick up, it's not about what you do, but how you do it. The stupidest things can work if you can pull them off right.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
| 0uch | PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:16 pm | |
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:36 pm
Posts: 1253 | | I would not peacock at all. Have a good sense of style. 3 years ago, peacocking was good, no one knew a lot about pick up. Now days, lots of girls know about it. Don't get discourage from running game though. Most will still not figure out there being gamed.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
CHAT