Quote:
Warped, do you mean just to open more sets? Or you going with Gunwitch's old saying "make the ho say no" and suggesting we pursue a girl until she gives us a flat out rejection. Because those are two very opposite ends of the spectrum, in my opinion. One means you're just opening en masse and the other can mean committing more to one set until the blowout bfore moving onto another.
PUA MM, please dont' derail this while I look for legitimate answers.
What I mean is this: Guys play it way to safe when they approach women. They play to not loose instead of playing to win. Because of this, they don't close as much as they could. The exercise I proposed in my original post is designed to combat this problem by getting these kinda guys outside their comfort zone.
By making it a goal to be so bold that they get rejected (blown out) on half their approached for a month, it will show them just how to be bold as they should be.
Jeffy has a cool quote that relates to this:
"Again, that's just the thing: the "finesse" route is actually MORE trouble in the long run. I may have a couple blowouts over the course of a night, while Finesse Man is looking cool in his 2 hour sets, but whats the difference? Well, at the end of the night he gets a phone number and a "pleasure meeting you" coupled with a friendly pat on the back, while me and my crew are ACTUALLY FUCKING GIRLS." - Jeff Allen