great info

thanks man

Sweet fucking article, Teacher! Sweet fucking thread. That is all. Carry on please.

If you are still doing "routine," you've missed the point completely.

Hi

I put a thread up in the general section but thought id ask for a touch of help here.

I have the sexual state down whenever I see this girl, all I think about is fucking the crap out of her every fucking day and she knows it as she has asked why I keep lookin at her. She doesnt mind cos she looks at me too.

What I need help with and feel kinda uncomfortable about is getting HER into the same state as I am and thinking about sex with ME. I mentioned her and I not bein good together as we would argue one minute but have the make up sex the next (I dont think that worked, she thinks make up sex is wrong - although i think she is lying and today she told me she missed me when im not at work with her)

How am I supposed to get her into the sexual state but in a tactful manner although I want it to be obvious also? im kinda desperate for the help cos im being a total idiot about things.

awesome post!

You just gave me a missing part of the puzzle. I can talk to girls and even some times get there e-mail but can never take it further. Now I know not just because of this post but by David Deangelo that she did not give the number or e-mail because she was attracted sexually. Women do not feel sexual attraction as fast as men and it was just because she was interested.

Maybe the beginning approach should be to build a social connection and some DHV. Then maybe on the first date I should start trying to build a sexual connection

_________________
you miss 100% of the shots you don't take

its a game of numbers

the worste that could happen is nothing

failing is the first step to successe

hey i really like this post but i have a question about the sexual framing. everytime i try sexual framing by either using a sex joke or sexual inuendo i dont feel like i get great responses. i have a coworker at my job that is probably the best natural game ive ever seen, every girl enjoys his company and when HE makes a sexual inuendo or says "i like blowjobs" (if the situation applies) they generally laugh and enjoy the comment. however if i do the same i either wont get laughter/positive response or alot of the time ill get a response like "wow another sex joke?" even though i vary i rarely make them, maybe once a week max.

now ive thought about just being entirely unapologetic and pounding through the negativity but i feel like once someone makes a statement like "another sex joke eh?" or simply doesnt respond positively its creepy to continue.

btw i know im quite an attractive guy. i know even the most attractive girls i see in my day are almost 100 percent of the time interested in meeting me. i go to the gym and even the hottest most intimidating girls will look at me unnecessarily, or work out near me.

I like this a lot.

It cuts right through the B.S. and helps me remember just why it is we learn these different techniques in the first place (to get her in bed)...one thing about PUA is that guys get so focused on the technical aspect of it all, that they lose sight of what it's all about (at least that was the case for me).

While you seem keen on getting closes that day or that moment, I think this approach can be flexible and used in a more "progressive manner".

I'm trying a more progressive/step-by-step approach of the same thing with a co-worker right now.

Gradually each interaction becomes more and more sexual (more tension, the frame is still there)...tonight, for example, I brought up the topic of sex casually.

I'll keep building on it, with the topic of sex and sexual tension being the central theme.

I hate to be picky with such an old original post, but I couldn't help myself. It's actually now a well established concept in evolutionary psychology that opposites *do not* attract.


Ever noticed how people look like their partners? Or that business partners often look alike? Or even that people look like their dogs?

Yep, that's right, we have instincts to seek out, help, and associate with, people who look like us.

The reason comes back to the desire to pass on our genes. Biologists long wondered why, if it's so important to pass on all our genes, do we throw out half of them every time we reproduce?

The answer is quite simple: we don't. By picking a mate who shares 60%, 70%, 80% or more of our genes, we might only throw out 10% each time we reproduce.

We do have instincts to look for people whose genes are different in critical areas, like immunity. When you say that a girl smells good, usually what you actually mean is that she has a high degree of dissimilarity in her Major Histocompatibility Complex, but largely we're looking for similarity, not difference.


But wait, you say, what about incest? Why are brothers and sisters going around being attracted to each other if this is true?

The short answer, is that incest avoidance is a special case. It relies on imprinting when you're young, so if you grow up living with a girl, even if you're not related to her, incest avoidance imprinting should stop you from being attracted to her.

Where this gets interesting is in a phenomenon called Genetic Sexual Attraction. Google it if you don't believe me.

GSA occurs when two siblings or other close relatives are separated at birth, but reunited later in life. Due to their close genetic relation, it's somewhat common for them to have sexual feelings for each other, especially if they're not aware that they are related.

Gross hey?


Anyways, this is more of academic interest, than having any specific application to sarging. But one thing you can take from it is that you are statistically more likely to be successful with girls who have similar facial features, and more likely to fall for girls like that.

Yep. I love evolutionary psychology. It's a great subject, and it really underpins just about everything that we do.

I thought about something similar. Chief, you said this works fine in a college campus-day game.

I really have hard time imagining going too sexually on a first girl I see on the street. Probably, when we first approach, building attraction with direct/indirect method, (without much of a sexual frame)+at least some logistics(if there are none just I wanna hang out with you should work just fine) would get the number. It's the first date I'd probably incorporate the sexual frame in, although this might create a confusion in a girl, but I think this can be dealt with.(by increasing it with a snowball effect)+some fun, should be the perfect mix. I'll try it out and say how it worked.

But I'd love to hear your opinions on this and Chief- I'd love to hear how you incorporate sexual framing/tension in your college-daygame.

Not read much of this thread, but this comment interested me: is sexual repulsion from members of our family not due to social learnings rather than genes? After all, there's a bit the Oedipus complex in most guys (and Electra complex in girls). Haven't most of you at some point find yourself attracted to someone who, with hindsight, had aspects that reminded you of your mum?

Edit - just read the post 2 above mine! Well said MyNameIsCanada!

Hey chief! I liked this post very well. It kinda all comes together for me now, and this has actually worked for me one time already.

But here's the thing:

I have been wondering, would an opener like: "Hey, you're looking very sexy" or something like that be a good thing? Because you really start building the sexual tension from the start. But instinctively, I would say it's really not a good thing to start building the tension from the very start of the conversation. I think the HB might start to expect too much and become kind of "disappointed" if your interaction with her slows a bit down later in the conversation.

What is your opinion about that and have you got any experience with an opener like that combined with your game described in your post?

I think I'll try this one this weekend, and I'll post my experiences here later if you guys would like.