A (More Mature) View On Why MM Is Bad



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:21 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 5903
Website: http://seductiveintrovert.com
I'm sure you've seen Warped Mindless's 2 threads on bashing MM. I'm sure you've also noticed how much of a space monkey (RSD fanboy) he is. I'm also sure that his blatantly RSD-brainwashed cult-like attitude and inability to spell "escalate" has put you off. Stop posting in those threads. Post in this one if you're not gonna be a dogmatic fuck. If you're not going to speak from your own experience, go away. I don't want quotes from that book or that book.

What I'd like to do is to open a constructive dialogue on the real reasons MM is bad without all the dogmatic nonsense from any fanboys from either side of the debate. Then I would like to discuss practical and useful alternatives to what MM has to offer without that bullshit elitist indirect advertising for RSD. Warped Mindless has attempted to open such a dialogue by comparing MM to RSD on a shallow level but doesn't actually seem to speak with his own words. I will speak from personal experience of practicing MM and coaching pickup students.

First of all, what experience do I have with MM and other pickup material? I've spent the past 7 years of my life learning and practicing almost everything that the seduction community has to offer. I have a very solid basis of understanding of the various different kind of methods that are out there. I also know how certain methods are advantageous over certain other methods for different situations.

Let's get something else out of the way before I start my MM-bashing:

The Good Things About MM

Microcalibration
Although I argue that social value has less to do with "attraction" and more to do with "comfort," (check out my thread "Sexual Attraction Explained In-depth" in the Mid-Game section) it is important to calibrate yourself in different situations so that you actually preserve the value that you "naturally" have. Newbies who give MM an initial read-through won't have a very good idea of what Microcalibration actually is, but the more practiced student will have a good hang of it. It's a pretty useful - although not strictly necessary - skill that helps you keep riding the social wave without wiping out.

Bounce/Extraction Logistics
The most invaluable thing I took away from MM are the logistics for actually moving the girl to different locations. Although MM didn't stress the importance of logistics nearly as much as it should have, it did lay a decent groundwork for pulling logistics. I still use the "plausible deniability" thing to pull the girl to my "seduction location." lol

Group Theory
Although other methods have better ways of handling sets with multiple people, MM does offer something for this. Even though your average MM student won't really know what to do once he has isolated a girl (compared to someone who has studied GWM and Vin DiCarlo, for example), he does have a fairly decent idea of what to do to in order to get to that isolation phase if the girl has friends and orbiters with her.

So, MM does indeed have its merits. However, the cons far outweigh the pros.

The Bad Things About MM

MM stands for Mental Masturbation
Of all the methods in the seduction community, it seems to me that MM encourages mental masturbation THE MOST. If you're not actually stuck in the mental masturbation trap of MM, but you have been before, you know what I'm talking about. I don't need to explain this one to you. If you are a newbie who has found this site right after reading "The Game," however, this one's for you.

Mental masturbation is bad because it creates a comfort zone inside your own head and keeps you from taking action in the physical world. One of the many downsides to MM's analytical nature is that it gives your ego far too many opportunities to rationalize things for the purposes of protection and value-preservation. This actually hinders your progress since you're preventing yourself from calling it like it is. The mental masturbation encouraged by MM will actually create sticking points for you and will force you to dedicate way too much time into this shit than you should. I actually wasted a few YEARS with MM, and I feel like I threw those years away in terms of learning pickup. We can discuss this point further but for now I'm going to move on.

MM's assumptions about attraction
MM assumes that the higher your "value," the higher the attraction. If you've seen this to be true from other experiences that you've had, trust me when I say that correlation does not equal causation. We all learned that one in school. Social value and attraction are related, but you're wasting your time if you're trying to get laid with a DHV story. Other methods have found ways of creating attraction and pushing a seduction forward a hundred times better than what MM could ever offer. Check out that Sexual Attraction thread that I mentioned earlier. Your penis will thank you.

Group Theory
I know I listed this one as a good thing initially but MM puts way too much emphasis on "running sets" and social domination techniques that don't even work out for you in the greatest way in the long run, and not enough emphasis on actually seducing a girl. Sure, you've got Lovedrop teaching pointers on kino escalation here and there, but most other methods have that shit down so much better. Sure, some methods like SS barely have an emphasis on kino escalation at all, but MM is in a pretty low tier when it comes to that, believe it or not. "Would you like to kiss me?" I mean, come on. Really?

Verbal Game
MM is one of the older methods, so I guess it wouldn't be too fair to criticize MM for having such a strong emphasis on verbal game since it's pretty damn close to the era when SS reigned supreme. That still doesn't change the fact that newbies today are using old technology and that they should upgrade. I think MM does teach that it matters more on HOW you say something rather than WHAT you actually say, but it still encourages people to think that WHAT they actually say (routines and DHV stories, for example) is more important than it actually is. David Deangelo already informed us a long time ago that words only make up 7% of communication, but Mystery still told you that you have to indirectly telling girls that you're a preselected protector of loved ones with a story about a stripper ex-girlfriend you've never had.

Dishonesty
It's no secret that MM encourages dishonesty. I don't think I even have to explain how. Unfortunately for the average MM student, consistent HONESTY is one of the most powerful seduction tools you can ever use. Those of us who have been practicing seduction for a long time have already figured this out. And, no, this isn't one of those "direct game vs. indirect game" arguments. You don't have to lie and/or hide behind half-truths to run any sort of game.

Hobbit, get your ass in here and join this discussion. I want to hear what you've got to say about this topic. :P


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:14 pm
Posts: 726
Thanks Chief for encouraging a mature discussion on the matter. Not sure if the masses here will be able to handle such unbiased intelligence, for instance:
Quote:
Mystery Method is:

- Weak for its lack of emphasis on being sexual with women, and actually seducing.

- Too analytical, linear and structured to actually enjoy in interactions.

Once you ignore the "M3 model" there are actually some good ideas. For the beginner, its helps them get their foot in the door.

Alot of their material is garbage, but one of the few good ideas I got from them was about living life by your own standards and not letting negativity weigh you down ("Frame Control")
In rebuttle; I can agree with your first point on seduction, but it could be said that other methods place too much emphasis on seduction, and not enough on solid game (e.g. comfort, 25-hour rule etc). So this could be a strength of MM.

Too analytical and LINEAR? Look at DiCarlo's escalation ladder. Now that's linear for you. And actually, there are many good ideas without having to ignore M3. So basically all the points you made = a biased load of cockmush. Also, I think frame control existed before MM and was not an MM idea originally.

I'll give my input when/if I have more time.

Loveeeeeeeee


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:12 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 2:20 am
Posts: 568
Thanks for giving a great breakdown of this, Chief.

I have a question for you, however: AFC Adam (at least in the past), has admitted that a lot of his game rides on social value.

You've made excellent points before about how you dislike value game, such as MM, and prefer arousal game, such as 60's method, but what would say about AFC Adam's game, which you could almost compare to a "Natural MM"?

_________________
Don't hate, just dominate.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:16 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:53 pm
Posts: 511
Im going to stick up for MM a bit here Although I don't believe the lines Mystery uses are the best choice's for words but his theory and M3 model is pretty useful


MM - gets people out of their comfort zone ( true it tricks most of us into it with false hopes ) nevertheless it gives people comfort to believe that if they fail at life theirs always the mm to help them.Its probably the best thing to read when entering the community

Negs - Do work ( in an evil kind of way) Its just a lot of people over use them and rely on them.

DHVing - Literally every method use''s this. An argument against DHV is that if your so high valued you don't have to DHV . Yet I believe most people who say this are mistaking this with "Bragging". DHVing if done suttly can work In your favor.

Opening - He had a lot of openers ( all of them shit in my opinion) but even if you take one of his caned openers to open a set you still have increased your chances of getting any where.

False Time constraint and 3 second rule - Previously if i opened a group without a ftc it usually ends bad , however after using one i find escalation to be much easier. You cant knock the 3 second rule it helps with AA so much . Its even helped me in other aspects of life such as when I'm dirt jumping on my MTB just to get me to stop thinking about if i fxck this jump up i could get hurt . It initiates the Fxck it response who gives a crap if this opening doesn't go down well or if i fall off my Mtb and die .

Hoop Theory - Its kind of similar to frame control . It helps afcs to recognize that their push overs and avoid making mistakes and complying to the girls terms.

I could rant on how effective it is for a long time but I beleive shorter comments are best.

I believe that everyone should go through the mm and move onto other mentors

Its the Only current method that gives structure ( that i know of ) going from A1-S3

Maybe this is because Im still between AFC-PUA but i believe the M3 model is pretty useful . Although I am only achieving moderate success using this model as guidelines with my own material but Im not overly dedicated to this lifestyle .


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:55 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:50 pm
Posts: 2197
Quote:
MM - gets people out of their comfort zone ( true it tricks most of us into it with false hopes ) nevertheless it gives people comfort to believe that if they fail at life theirs always the mm to help them.Its probably the best thing to read when entering the community
Agree
Quote:
Negs - Do work ( in an evil kind of way) Its just a lot of people over use them and rely on them.
Negs CAN work and often do if used right but I pose a question for you...just because something works, does it make it the bast, or most healthy way to do it?

Im not a fan of negs and other value manipulation tools but yes, they do work I just believe there are better ways.
Quote:
DHVing - Literally every method use''s this. An argument against DHV is that if your so high valued you don't have to DHV . Yet I believe most people who say this are mistaking this with "Bragging". DHVing if done suttly can work In your favor.
Disagree. Even if your not bragging, your still feeling the need to prove yourself to her. Your intent always shines thru and she will realize this.
Quote:
Opening - He had a lot of openers ( all of them shit in my opinion) but even if you take one of his caned openers to open a set you still have increased your chances of getting any where.
Yes, almsot all the canned openers suck.
Quote:
False Time constraint and 3 second rule - Previously if i opened a group without a ftc it usually ends bad , however after using one i find escalation to be much easier. You cant knock the 3 second rule it helps with AA so much . Its even helped me in other aspects of life such as when I'm dirt jumping on my MTB just to get me to stop thinking about if i fxck this jump up i could get hurt . It initiates the Fxck it response who gives a crap if this opening doesn't go down well or if i fall off my Mtb and die .
Better than the 3 second rule is the GO NOW rule. Often times guys will satrt to approach a girl and then he goes slowly and then hes like "ooops, the 3 seconds is up..guess I cant approach." Its their subconscious way of letting themselves pussy out. The GO NOW rule simply is this: see hot girl, go get hot girl before you let yourself think about it.

_________________
Never get broken up with again: the-addiction-formula-never-get-broken- ... 88794.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:26 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:03 pm
Posts: 57
you are right i have experience with the "mental masturbation" i have lost many sets because mm says things like "you never chase the HB" or "give up quickly" and focus on manipulation HBs also do manipulation so we are manipulating each other and that can go terrible wrong


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:20 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:18 am
Posts: 81
Location: New Zealand
Hi Chief, didnt actually see this new thread until after I posted my last reply here:

7-vt73567.html?start=90

Coincidentally, you had already taken it on board to do exactly what i suggested to Warped in my post, saying it could be productive to have a balanced assessment of MM and other methods too, from experienced guys, so that the newbie, or perhaps an experienced guy who wants to change up his methods and expand his horizons can have a reference to go to.

So Im curious, would anyone here who has used RSD methods in depth be able to post up a similar list of pros/cons?

_________________
Take your Ops.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:23 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 424
Location: Melbourne
I agree whole-heartedly with almost everything you've said Chief. I think that because of the type of guy Mystery is he has written a method filled with rules and theories. He's tried to make it black and white. That simplicity and linear progression can be fantastic for those starting out that have no idea how to manage social interaction. But if you get stuck in it it will eventually hinder your progress.

Also for me Mystery's 7 hour rule is the thing I have the most trouble understanding. 7 hours which you can shorten with an "instant date" or certain comfort building techniques just doesn't add up. I haven't spent more than 2 hours talking to any of the girls I've slept with this year and I'm yet to have a single week without sex with a new girl. Who knows, maybe every single girl I approach is a slut, but I don't think so.

I think the quality of the time you spend together and how she perceives you and how she imagines what you'll be like in bed is 100 times more important than the amount of time or comfort building or instant dates.

Mystery by his very nature has too many rules. But I did see him in field once, he pulled a absolutely gorgeous girl. So something is to be said for his method.

_________________
Even the most naturally gifted can learn to become better.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:53 pm
Posts: 511
Never thought about Go now ! makes more sense :)

and with
Quote:
I pose a question for you...just because something works, does it make it the bast, or most healthy way to do it?
If its not broke don't fix it, If you get me . Negs shouldn't be negs it should just be called busting womens balls in an everyday setting.
Quote:
Disagree. Even if your not bragging, your still feeling the need to prove yourself to her. Your intent always shines thru and she will realize this.
It depends .... If your intent shines through i classify that as bragging

A classic example my friend always does which is really cringe worthy to listen to " I have huge muscles and i don even work out .... I mean wtf" That is bragging

A successful DHV would show weaknesses and would be relevant of up to the past week or so and would try and include her e.g. " I'm really gutted one of my strings on my guitar broke before i managed to go on stage and i didn't get to play ....... Have you ever been in a situation where you've been so close to something and then it gets taken away from you ?"

But anyways that's going off topic :) I'm really Interested in what peoples honest opinions are of mm and if mine are wrong , so im going to keep checking up on this post.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:10 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:18 am
Posts: 81
Location: New Zealand
Quote:

Also for me Mystery's 7 hour rule is the thing I have the most trouble understanding. 7 hours which you can shorten with an "instant date" or certain comfort building techniques just doesn't add up. I haven't spent more than 2 hours talking to any of the girls I've slept with this year and I'm yet to have a single week without sex with a new girl. Who knows, maybe every single girl I approach is a slut, but I don't think so.

I think the quality of the time you spend together and how she perceives you and how she imagines what you'll be like in bed is 100 times more important than the amount of time or comfort building or instant dates.
Im sure Mystery has brought girls home earlier than 7 hours ;)

The point is, and this is quite important to note about a lot of this method-hating (not just MM) is context is so important.

Mystery first put forward the 7 hour rule as the minimum length of time he felt was required to really seduce a girl, to hijack her mind, her emotions, and her body completely, if you have the skill to do so.

Obvioulsy, he is talking about the seduction of women of the highest quality, and not drunk club sluts. Although im sure Mystery has shagged a few of them as well.

And I would agree with him, that the 7 hour rule is approximately right. For example, Ive instafucked a handful of girls in clubs toilets, enough to know that

a) its disgusting
b) you think its fucking awsome if you are drunk
c) its a cool story to tell your friends but.....after the first couple times sorta loses its wow factor

ANYWAYS

Now I prefer to have higher quality women in my life, and in fact would rather have less quantity and more quality. My latest current flame is a russian girl, hb9 platinum blonde, amazing body, the full package. But to me the looks are just the icing on the cake, she manages a luxury hotel in my city and she has been travelling around the world for the last 7 years (since she was 14) so she has so many interesting stories....and a great perspective in life that I find intellectually stimulating.

And yes, although I did run great game on her, and I was authentic, letting my true self shine through, I was confident I would lock it in so didnt push. And the full seduction took 3 nights, approximatley spending around 7 hours with her in total.

So although its a little restrictive to say a certain time limit, I do think that 7 hours as a rule of thumb possibly could be a valuable thing to have in the back of the mind.

I even think that the 7 hours thing partially has to do with the amount of time you need to get to know a girl before you trust her......I have a lot of nice things in my apartment, sometimes I worry when I meet a girl in the club and bring her home straightaway, I worry that I need to keep my eyes on her. So it can work both ways.

_________________
Take your Ops.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:24 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 424
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
Now I prefer to have higher quality women in my life, and in fact would rather have less quantity and more quality.ways.
I suppose it's about how you define quality. I'm not looking for a relationship so for me it's just looks that matter. I've only slept with one girl this year that I didn't think was gorgeous. All 8s and 9s (never seen a 10 in my life, don't believe a perfect girl exists) most of them models.

I've picked up girls in the day, at night, on a train. And whether i sleep with them then and there or just get a number and meet her at a bar later or have her over for predrinks and never actually leave the fact remains. If she's attracted to me, and I'm a good looking guy so most of them are, she will shag me if i go for it.

7 hours just seems so far beyond time experiences for me. I actually can't remember ever taking that long to sleep with a girl. Even back at 14 losing my virginity, I'd only met the girl maybe 4 hours earlier. I dunno, maybe I'm good at picking girls that are really attracted to me, but it just seems too long.

_________________
Even the most naturally gifted can learn to become better.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:40 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:18 am
Posts: 81
Location: New Zealand
^^^

Like I was trying to explain, but perhaps I didnt do so well, is I am talking about seduction, not sex. I could have fucked this girl the first night I met her for sure, but that wasnt the point!

_________________
Take your Ops.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:20 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 6
>It's no secret that MM encourages dishonesty

Where is that said or written? As far as I know, mystery tells DHV stories from his life, which actually happened. Thus being honest.

He said in a video something like “use your own DHV story. If you cannot come up with one, use my story (ex-stripper-girl, etc.) AND later come up with your own”.

If I say to a girl “you high jacked my brain”, I am honest.
If flirting involves a bit of lying, I can live with that.


>Verbal Game

You can kiss close (and probably f-close) without talking at all (I have gambler’s methods in mind). BUT why is that better to using verbal game? It’s just a different style.

There are many solution to a problem.

What’s different with mystery compared to others is that he has charisma. I recently showed a girl videos of different pick up artists, she said ‘I definitely would go for mystery’.

His metaphors “40 000 years ago…” are scientifically seen bshit. They just illustrate his points.


Finally, It’s all about quality.

Mystery and Style have created HIGH QUALITY methods and teachings, which are seldom matched by other PUAs. I find many concepts of Mystery are part of other methods, which was already addressed in an answer.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:05 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:54 pm
Posts: 633
Thanks Chief for putting a well balanced thread about MM.
Quote:
What are the practical alternatives to MM that give the same groundwork for motivation? It's easy to say "yea this sucks, do it better" when your already past a certain point.
But I agree with Hobbit. We need another post of an alternative (newer/non-obsolete) method doing that same comparison.

_________________
Image

"Their compliance is,
'Does she grab your hand?' F*ck you! I want to grab her mind. If I can
grab her mind, she'll be grabbing whatever I want, any way I want her to." - Ross Jeffries


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:40 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:24 am
Posts: 173
Location: England
Quote:
"Would you like to kiss me?" I mean, come on. Really?


erm, yes, I use that and it has worked for me :)


but I do agree with alot of that, Microcalibration is incrdibly important and I actually learnt it from the Venusian Arts Handbook.

but I can't and will not fault the M3 method after some of the results I've got over the past coupla months

_________________
To Succeed You Have to Stop being Ordinary and Start being Legend...Wait For It....Dary!!!

If you do what you always did, you will get what you always got.

Live for the Moment, Never see a Chance you didn't take!


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link