Quote:
My story is closest to the first one marc shared. Only she cheated on my every time, then came crawling back...crying. I was a moron.
Sorry to hear tht chevylover. Isnt it suprising that the same thing has happened to guys all over and everytime the way they come back to you is by
CRYING. The story is the same every single time. It makes me think whether this is any kind of a test that women throws at you , just to see whether she made the right decision or not or whether you ever wanted her or not or may be and just may be she needs a validation one last time that she is good and can have any guy. I dont know the answer but something here intrigues me.
Quote:
I maintain that as bullshit.
Emotion is not opposite to logic,although ARE emotional creatures it is an extreme to assume that women are illogical or do not understand themselves on a logical level.
It's also socially and historically wrong to assume relationships fail when the woman has control.
Thier is no real difference in how men and women think, their is a shift of emphasis in possible tempermants etc, but it's not a difference as we would see it normally.
Who Said women are illogical. But when put understress or given a situation to react to the EMOTIONAL side of a woman overpowers the Logical side. Now I haven't read as many biological evolutionary books as some of the other guys but I'm speaking from my experience and observation.
For your social and historical stats argument, well yes there are very many examples and a lot from the guys in here too where relationships have gone down when the guys gave the girl the power. Think about it, if you were to drive a relationship, a company, or your own finances would you want to be driven by someone who is emotional or some one who is passionate & LOGICAL.
You are suprisingly wrong on the last point. There is a HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOW MEN & WOMEN think. Put both of them in a similar situation and you would see that they
approach & internalizeit differently.
Quote:
Marc, have you heard David DeAngelo's theory about dog breading? ............Women are comfortable when they can feel barriers around them. It makes them feel secure. Of course the way to know the barriers are there, is to test them...
TheJ, I haven't heard of the dog breading theory but it sounds interesting. Could you kindly elaborate on the part above in bold letters. That sounds interesting.
Quote:
Women can't think without feeling; they are more in touch with their emotions than we can ever realize.
Few men actually internalize this, or are even aware of this major difference in the way males and females think vs. feel. Consequentially men in relationships will let themselves get sucked into a womans emotional shitstorms without knowing it.
In a strong and healthy relationship the man stands his ground as the leader and a backbone of emotional stability for her to come back to. The more feminine a woman is the less she can clearly express herself to a man and is unable to lead. On the other hand, more feminine less masculine guys will click well with more of a dominant, rational type, who now takes on the masculine role in the relationship.
I dont know if these are your orginal ideas or from the book. But I agree to every bit said here. This makes complete sense and I absolutly agree to it.