Introducing: An Alternative to HBs; coining a new PU term



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge





Should this new classification of women be added to the PU lingo?
Yeah- Cute Girls is good!  12%  [ 2 ]
Yeah- We need something, but Cute Girl, or Cute Chick isn't the right word...  24%  [ 4 ]
No- I don't really think this matters...  65%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 17
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:16 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 7:02 am
Posts: 60
AOL: TheNewSNAFU
Location: Burlington, VT
We all know what an HB is. She is that girl all the chumps want. She is wearing her five inch heels that make her calves and ass look great in that little black dress. She is a little catty, even though we know it’s just a bitch shield. She is so used to AFCs flocking around her for her attention that she is a little stuck up, but it’s understandable why they want to flock to her. She is, after all, a Hot Babe.
Now, what about that girl who is wearing jeans and a hoodie? She hangs out with everyone but she isn’t one of the guys. Sure her sweatshirt is a little baggy but you can tell the tight body is still there underneath. Her hair isn’t all done up, it’s just in a ponytail and she’s drinking a pint just like you. She is down to earth, fun, and you find yourself enjoying her company. You didn’t notice her at first because you were busy working HBs, but there is something about this girl that you find attractive…

Maybe this sounds crazy to you, but I think there is a clear difference between these types of girls. Physically they are both very attractive. But I think an HB is more than just looks, it’s the whole package. It’s the attitude, the walk, everything. Thus I find girls who are still physically attractive but don’t have all of the other characteristics of an HB to be a completely different animal.
Perhaps this is of little importance to the rest of you, but I feel that these girls need their own acronym and I am wondering what your thoughts are and if you have any ideas. I find that most often when I meet a girl like this my friends will ask how my night was and I will end up describing the girl I was with not as an HB but saying that she was “Really Cute…” And thus I have settled on CG: Cute Girl, or CC: Cute Chick. Not very original, but I really feel like these girls merit differentiation from HBs. Let me know what you think gentlemen.


And for the record, I have looked around for some other term, maybe one exists but I haven’t been able to find it. If you know of one that is commonly used let me know.

_________________
"As to the deceit perpetrated upon women, let it pass, for, when love is in the way, men and women as a general rule dupe each other."
-Giacomo Casanova


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:43 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Phoenix, AZ
I am right there with you man. I have noticed these women many times in social scenes and more often than not I find myself gravitating towards them.

Their appeal is in more so in their personality and charm rather than their outward beauty, even though they are often stellar in the looks department as well.

In all honestly, I would rather have an 8.5 with this type of persona than a stuck up HB10 bitch any day of the week.

As for names...

UC = Undercover Cutie (lame I know)
WS = Welcomed Surprise

Meh, If I think of anything else I will hop back on and post.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:59 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:22 am
Posts: 89
Sounds like a "Girl next door" (GND) type of hot to me...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 1688
Location: UK
how about we stop talking like we are in the army and call them cute girls, hot girls, sexy girls, girls, women whatever argh lol

_________________
Troll the trolls
free book http://www.4shared.com/file/123140320/b ... ndows.html


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:59 pm
Posts: 1929
Location: the moon
Quote:
how about we stop talking like we are in the army and call them cute girls, hot girls, sexy girls, girls, women whatever argh lol
quoted for truth.

We've got enough jargon as is.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:47 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 835
Im tired of the fucking terminology issues. We dont need more jargon. Ok, maybe for new techinques but its just silly.

_________________
V1V :twisted:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 6:05 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:41 am
Posts: 233
It hardly matters...

Attraction isn't based upon what class the girl fits into. HB was merely a term coined to rate that attraction on a scale. The entire idea behind it really is ridiculous.

You're either attracted, or not attracted to a woman. Sure, there are varying levels in between there, like really attracted, or kind of attracted. In either case though, rating women on a "HB" scale of 1 to 10 really doesn't end up helping you in any way.

Loose the term. There's a reason a lot of people ignore the entire "HB" ratings all together. We don't need them.

_________________
Mimicking an artist never leads to true success... However becoming an artist mimicked is true success


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:12 pm
Posts: 222
Location: cornwall
i dont really think it matters, rating a girl out of ten is bas enough without using "hb" or "cg" or even worse "ug" just say a number and use that "shes about a 7" will do fine

_________________
Do not follow where the path may lead.
Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 9:16 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:12 pm
Posts: 222
Location: cornwall
Quote:
Im tired of the fucking terminology issues. We dont need more jargon. Ok, maybe for new techinques but its just silly.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
what he said!

_________________
Do not follow where the path may lead.
Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 9:49 am 
Offline
Moderator Emeritus

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:13 pm
Posts: 2151
I still think the best ever system was the binary system for women..
1 = I would
0 = I wouldn't

All the rest is simply for bragging on something that is totally subjective to the person.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:34 am
Posts: 120
Quote:
I still think the best ever system was the binary system for women..
1 = I would
0 = I wouldn't

All the rest is simply for bragging on something that is totally subjective to the person.
couldn't agree more.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link