Part of my whole teaching system is about linguistics and how it affects mindset, even on a theoretical level.

You walk into a bar, and you've told yourself "I've got to make this girl attracted to me" then you're automatically setting your subconscious up for failure by assumption. I believe you have to spin-doctor yourself and KNOW that you are going to be welcomed into conversation by women that ALREADY ARE attracted to you.

It's two different ways of saying the same thing... but seeing it work on MANY clients the way I've taught it (the positive connotation)... just saying I believe my damn eyes.

What I'm saying about this theory is that the premise DOES affect mindset. You can't just pick and choose which part of a theory your subconscious will latch on to. Especially if you're within your first year of studying PUArts.

Understand? Let's get back to discussing the other points of this theory because I'm done explaining this. I feel like it's got hijacking potential, and we'd like to steer away from that.

_________________
- Zip

no disrespect, but I know this...I think you missed the point. what I am saying is that even if you strip away the bad linguistics, the underlying idea is flawed. Maybe you didn't read my previous post which discussed this theory, so you thought I was just repeating what the previous people said.

Isn't a flawed underlying idea a "point of this theory" worth discussing? I don't think that is hijacking the thread, I think that is getting to the point. But anyway, it looks like the original poster is gone now.