A Matter of Taste



Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 34 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
 Post subject: A Matter of Taste
PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:57 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 5903
Website: http://seductiveintrovert.com
I won't ever be able to sarge and successfully pick up any given woman I set my eyes on. That's impossible. I once held a belief that if you're adaptable enough with your game such a feat would be possible, but that's bullshit.

As I've learned from various pickup sources, learning game isn't about adding on additional layers to yourself. Instead, it's about peeling away the layers that stifle your core. In the end you will want to fully enable yourself into expressing your true core and core intent in an eloquently expressive fashion. This method of learning and practicing the art of pickup (Natural Game) is rooted in the premise that women are naturally attracted to who you truly are on the inside by default; basically, that "being yourself" is the most effective key in seduction.

Layers that stifle your core can include things like limiting beliefs, bad body language habits, inner demons from past trauma, ego, etc. There are millions of things that can stifle you. Being stifled is having any inhibitions from expressing your true self. On the stage, being stifled is letting anything hold you back from skillfully expressing your true current emotional state (or whatever you're trying to communicate) in most sincere and effective way possible.

If you learn to love yourself, to not take yourself for granted, other people will love you, too. As human beings we are all able to relate to each other in some way, but we all have these layers that stifle us from seeing that. Instead, the best we could possibly do without achieving full godly enlightenment is to find certain parts of ourselves that align with certain parts of other people. This is why it is actually possible to not be someone's "type." Everyone is stifled in some way that blocks them from being able to fully relate to certain people that are stifled in some other way.

This is why, no matter how much I strip myself of my stifling layers, I will not be able to seduce any woman in the world. People in general will become attached to some of their stifling layers, creating a phenomenon called "taste." Sure, I will most certainly increase the amount of "types" of women that will be attracted to me by peeling away these layers of mine, but there will always be some women that do not share the same taste as I do. Some women will always not be my "type."

If I never learned to peel away these layers, if I never learned to love myself, essentially no one could really love me. It would be very difficult to generate any attraction within any woman. It really is great to expand that pool of people that CAN fall in love with you, though, by learning the way of the PUA... but in reality can someone with the ability to attract and seduce any woman anywhere really exist? I think not.

I came to this realization while I was playing along to some songs on my guitar just now. When I was a kid I had this dream to be a great singer/guitarist. However, I've always hated my voice. It brought me down to think that I could never win the hearts of music fans with singing talent, even though I rock at guitar.

I then thought about what almost every experienced singer has told me, though. They all echo something along the lines of, "good singing is all about falling in love with your own voice." It's like game. Anyone who hates their voice will sound terrible to others, and will not be able to give a good performance. Anyone who does love their own voice, however, will always be able to captivate the ears of some types of people.

Think about all the famous voices you've ever heard, and all the bands that you love to listen to. I'm sure you know some people that hate some of these singers, and plenty of people that love them. The same goes for a pickup artist; some types of women will throw their panties off in a heartbeat for some pure expressions of Don Juanery while some types of women will be turned off by the same pickup by the same PUA.

The universal attraction switches are still valid, as are the universal rules of music theory. Music theory dictates what sounds good and what sounds bad to an extent, but it doesn't always penetrate the filter of taste. Pickup theories dictate what is attractive and what isn't to an extent, but, again, it doesn't always penetrate the filter of taste. You can follow the rules to dramatically increase your effectiveness in giving a great performance, but you can never win em all.

But who the hell actually cares about winning them all? A "real" musician doesn't concern himself with fame and fortune. Musicians who let their egos get the best of them end up recording a really shitty second album. All that real musicians care about is finding the best and most artistic way to express what they're really feeling. They want to reach the audience that they can relate to the most on the deepest level possible, and so should the pickup artist. Doing so brings a deep sense of fulfillment like no other. This is why so many pickup gurus stress the importance of finding out what exactly you're looking for in a woman because you're exhaustively wasting time and energy if you're trying to focus on attracting ALL women in general.

Find your style, your genre, your target audience. It's all about finding yourself.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:16 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:17 pm
Posts: 192
Wicked post man. I've come to realize some of these lessons over time myself. Peeling back the filters does wonders for self-image as well as how others perceive you. On top of that, I've found that the relationships that you do end up forming with women that are into the "unfiltered" you tend to be much stronger and more fulfilling because the bonds are not based on artificial foundations. Cheers!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:53 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 5903
Website: http://seductiveintrovert.com
Just thought I'd share some great stuff from the outside world here:

Here's a really good response from someone on another forum that supports my post:
Quote:
Didn't you hear man? MASF (the bible) says Mystery can seduce his own mum!!! :-P


Seriously though, good post.
...maybe I can understand it because I'm a seducer and musician too
or maybe it's just because I already came to the same conclusions myself.


Saying that a man could learn enough to seduce any woman on the planet is absurd. It's just like trying to create a band or song that will be loved by 100% of music lovers. Then again, it still boggles my mind how many people try to argue for universality. You'll usually find it here, under the topics of "women's attraction mechanisms" and "women's looks". Apparently women's looks are universally graded based on <whoever is posting at the time>, while the way to best attract them is usually based on <whoever is posting at the time>.

"I swear man, what I prefer just happens to be universally preferred too!!!"
And here's a really good response from someone on another forum that argues against my post:
http://fastseduction.com/discussion/fs? ... 7987&fid=8

(I can only give links to mASF posts because of their legal guidelines.)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link