Hi.
Do girls have an analogy to PUA? If so what are they called?
I wanted to look over their forums and see what they're yanking about.
If so, any websites that they use?

Thanks all!

lol, girls are out at clubs, not sitting on the internet.

i dont think girls have problems picking up guys.. even if there fat and ugly... some desparate guy will pick her up. so i have to say. No theres not.

_________________
"Live life to the fullest, never look back, remember No regrets" J.f

Go out side and to a mall or something and just observe the girls you see about you. You will most probably learn more that way than trying to read their "thoughts" online.

How about "Cocktease"?

Sluts? lol, I know it sounds bad but a PUA/Player = a man who gets lots of girls. A girl that gets lots of guys would be the analogy, no? It's too bad in modern culture that women are shunned for being promiscuous.

If you are talking about being able to seduce or get really quality guys, I don't think there is an analogy. Most of a woman's value comes from her genetics and grooming. Most of the remainder is showing that she is ready to mate (eye contact, kissing other girls, shaking her hips, pouting lips...).

Wow you guys need to be less judgemental and more open minded. There's several women on this very forum that focus on improving their attraction skills. Doesn't make them sluts. There's a ton of guys on this forum that are very selective about the women they are with and don't have a lot of relationships because they focus on quality rather than quantity. Sure, there are guy sluts on this forum, maybe even girl sluts too, just like there are both in real life, but there are also people just looking for better relationships and how to get into them on here and in real life.

Just cause they are girls, doesn't mean they are any better at knowing what to do with men. Most guys are just only looking at physical beauty and so the girls don't get the guys they want, because that's all they know how to use to get them. There's so much more to real relationships and that's exactly why so many relationships fail. If girls were as good as you think they are, then they wouldn't keep reading Cosmo, or ask guys for advice with their relationships. They're just as confused about it as guys are. If you don't believe me, then go ask a girl on here.

_________________
"The 'Brick Walls' are there to allow you to prove how badly you want something!" ~ Randy Pausch

~ Rye

It is the nature of man to take every sexual opportunity with every woman he finds attractive. A woman who gets off with any man is not someone I would like to have sex with or even spend time with.

You see women are genetically programmed to seek males who are socially dominant. While a woman is pregnant she can not get pregnant again so it is in her interest to find a loyal man who will help her rear the young. This is contrary to male genes, which urge him to spread the seed with every opportunity he gets.

Therefore women who have sex with many partners are doing so not because of nature, but rather nurture. There are many reasons as to why they would do this. But mostly what ever the reason it is to achieve one common goal: to feel like they are important.

I'm not saying women won't fuck with other guys while they are in a relationship, they will in fact do so, but with males who they see as more dominant than their mate.

And I completely agree with the Toronto guy. Women are just as confused as men, but unfortunatly, or perhaps fortunatly, nature made it so that men are the seducers and women are the seduced, urging us males to be initiators.

Now back to my original question. What I meant was do women have a website similar to this? Not on being whores, but about their feelings and how to interact with men. That is what I meant, not picking up guys, but seeking support in relationships or their own game.

Alrite fellaz good luck to yal and have a good day!

My post was not in any way meant to be judgmental. I was merely trying to emphasize the double standard in today's society: A guy who gets around is a player/PUA. A girl who gets around is a slut/skank/whore. Also I was trying to make the point that for a man to be successful, he must have the knowledge and instincts to convey higher value through non-physical traits. For women this is not as important; physical traits make up most of their value.
Ah, alright. Most girls I see get their info from cosmo/soaps/chick flicks. One tip I can give: A lot of guys are quite dim-witted and really slow to pick up on the subtle IOI's you drop when you like them. Go easy with the 'playing hard to get' card.

Arnold, I think you are seeing things a little black and white. People aren't merely attracted to people that they see as being more dominant and genetic mates. People are hugely affected by emotions when seeking out partners and will engage in sexual relationships with people that they feel a great sense of connection with, even when they don't view them as the best genetic mate, or most dominant man.

_________________
"The 'Brick Walls' are there to allow you to prove how badly you want something!" ~ Randy Pausch

~ Rye

[quote="PlethoraMy post was not in any way meant to be judgmental. I was merely trying to emphasize the double standard in today's society: A guy who gets around is a player/PUA. A girl who gets around is a slut/skank/whore.[/quote]

It is not a double standard at all, my friend, monogamy IS the nature of women and Polygamy IS the nature of men. It has been like this ever since written history (powerful men had harems with beautiful women, poor men where lucky to get one wifey).
Feminism is influencing the western societies to believe that women are as equal as men. It pushes them to compete with men in all areas, giving women an edge in relationships, because a decently looking woman can go to ANY party and hav a line lined up of guys who want to fuck her, men on the other hand have to work hard and have the necesary skills, looks, poise etc... First off I don't want to say that men are somehow better than women, but I am pushing a claim that we are different.

For the reason I already explained in my previous post: nature has it so that men take sexual opportunities and women tend to seek out one mate they can stick with for a while.
This is a simple exlanation, if you feel otherwise (and I felt just as you did), you should read a book called "The Red Queen" by Matt Ridley. It should clear the confusion you have about women who sleep with many men.

Think about it this way: a woman that is too easy is not as fun, and when everyone can have her she loses her value (atleast for me it is like this).

Humans treasure things that are rare and hard to get to. A whore is good for fun times, but not for relationships. I learned the hard way.

1.) I did not say ALL people are attracted to dominance, but almost all women are.
2.)Once again WOMEN are attracted to people they have an emotional connection with, men will fuck any good looking woman.
3.)Women SETTLE (I strongly emphasize this word to make my point) for men they don't see as dominant because they simply can not get anyone better. This is for the most part a fact: Intelligent beautiful women marry RICH men. Most royal women in Western societies were pushed into marrying powerful men who they were not necesarily in love with. And that is why many romance movies and books are about royalty, because women would cheat on their husbands with someone who made them feel better. But in the end they lived with their husbands because they provided them with a superior shelter and more money.

I must recommend Matt Ridley's "Red Queen" for you also.

I think you need to read some more anthropology. Check out Why Is Sex Fun by Jared Diamond. He talks at great length about many things that completely contradict what you've said above. Women aren't just interested in emotional connection, nor monogamy. Females search for better genetic breeding partners and sleep with many partners in order to procure the best sperm. There's a reason why sperm actually has different classes (fighters and empregnators), so that they will battle and kill competing sperm as well as trying to empregnate the embryo.

_________________
"The 'Brick Walls' are there to allow you to prove how badly you want something!" ~ Randy Pausch

~ Rye

Well if you reread our conversation, you are the one who mentions that women are interested in an emotional connection first. And I never made the claim that they are only interested in it.
What exactly does that book contradict about what I've said?

ArnoldTheMan, just shut the fuck up before you get banned !!

_________________
There is NO secret ingredient. Theres just you.