Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
exerting shrewd or devious influence especially for one's own advantage
Without getting into a big semantical debate, I think its quite wrong to think all communication and such is manipulation as many have said previously.
I agree with Hobbit here although it is clear that an agreement on the definition and limits of manipulation is not going to be reached. For a start the American and English dictionary give different definitions.
Hehe, exactly why I didn't bother to attempt it. I can agree with this definition in ways, although I can agree with several points others have made, mostly Chief's definition is how I feel about it. I think this is a great discussion.
I think the grey area occurs, when you get a person to THINK they are doing something they want, when in actuality, they are doing something that is not something they will like once they realise the reality of the situation. Sometimes we get people to want to help us and they think it will benifit them to do so, but really we are just using them to serve our own needs and not theirs at all (I've been conned like this a few times and boy does it sting).
I'll agree with Hobbit's sentiments though, of not manipulating women into relationships, or in a romantic/sexual way, although occassionally I have had need to manipulate people, which can include females, but not in a romantic/sexual sort of way, merely as human beings. When I do this though, I do my best not to cause any sort of harm to them, or make it so that they suffer for it later, as I consider myself a pacifist and a humanitarian.