Everything you say...



Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot] and 11 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
 Post subject: Everything you say...
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:09 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:28 pm
Posts: 776
Location: D.C., U.S.A.
Everything you say should have a message behind it. It's amazing how many people talk without actually saying anything. This is key and seperates the AFCs to PUAs.

We must talk with purpose and a message in a PU. It's how we control discussions and conversation. If you can do this subtley to the subconscious you can also mindfuck anyone you please. Build them up to believe your bullshit and then break them calling them out, then build them back up again.
This is called fractionation. It gets them deeper and deeper into believing you.

I'm not enforcing mindfucking people though.

In conversation with a girl, behind every story and every joke, you must send a message. It can be anything: "I wanna fuck your brains out, I want to marry you or I want you to fall in love with me". These messages must be communicated to her from the beginning to end. It's how you change states of her which also requires control and messaging. This is why the great discussion comes up of Indirect vs. Direct, Indirectly it's really difficult to change states with her (since you haven't been doing it from the beginning she won't be use too it). But then again you have the advantage of being under the radar. Okay I just went off topic.

Back to what I was saying.. These messages must be sent from the beginning of PU to the end in order to change states for her. Giggle-mode to sex-mode. You can do this through any form of communication really and most of you already do it subsconsciously. But that fluff-talk shit people do when they first meet, fuck that. Don't go near it.

This also gets into NLP, now you don't have to practice NLP in order to keep all this in mind. It's really crucial, sending messages subtley or directly, but the point is you need to send messages and be a switch for the girl; changing her states as you please. This will allow you to open her up.

_________________
I'm addicted to facing my fears.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:45 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 109
Quote:
Everything you say should have a message behind it. It's amazing how many people talk without actually saying anything. This is key and seperates the AFCs to PUAs.

We must talk with purpose and a message in a PU. It's how we control discussions and conversation. If you can do this subtley to the subconscious you can also mindfuck anyone you please. Build them up to believe your bullshit and then break them calling them out, then build them back up again.
This is called fractionation. It gets them deeper and deeper into believing you.

I'm not enforcing mindfucking people though.

In conversation with a girl, behind every story and every joke, you must send a message. It can be anything: "I wanna fuck your brains out, I want to marry you or I want you to fall in love with me". These messages must be communicated to her from the beginning to end. It's how you change states of her which also requires control and messaging. This is why the great discussion comes up of Indirect vs. Direct, Indirectly it's really difficult to change states with her (since you haven't been doing it from the beginning she won't be use too it). But then again you have the advantage of being under the radar. Okay I just went off topic.

Back to what I was saying.. These messages must be sent from the beginning of PU to the end in order to change states for her. Giggle-mode to sex-mode. You can do this through any form of communication really and most of you already do it subsconsciously. But that fluff-talk shit people do when they first meet, fuck that. Don't go near it.

This also gets into NLP, now you don't have to practice NLP in order to keep all this in mind. It's really crucial, sending messages subtley or directly, but the point is you need to send messages and be a switch for the girl; changing her states as you please. This will allow you to open her up.
I'm going to disagree with most of that, Beschatten.
a) Conveying interest too early is mostly ineffective. (see the popularity of opinion openers) Therefore, you have to change your "message", as you put it, from the early stages to the later attraction/comfort stages. You have to make her earn your message of interest.

b) Disqualifying is a HUGE part of a succesful set and sends the "message"that you arent interested....which generates attraction (we chase that which retreats from us)

c) Push-Pull (as Style calls is) is a really powerful way of generating attraction which is the opposite of what you are advising: aka mixed signals.

d) Although I think our conversations should be lead by the PUA and with a meaningful purpose, it's also important not to be a social robot. If you always have some agenda, it is really transparent and also takes the fun out of interactions.

Sorry to crap on your post man, I just have found a lot of success doing the exact opposite.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:47 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:32 pm
Posts: 402
Hmm, everything you say DOES have a message doesn't it? "Wow this weather sucks, it's so hot(you dislike the heat), but on the beach you can just cool off in the waves"(you enjoy the beach/like to have options).

I used to have a mindset of NEVER EVER talk about typical, boring shit. If the conversation was ever on something dull, i'd change the topic or simply ignore the person(s). Although i prefer certain types of conversation, fluff talk is necessary to find out things about people. It is also a casual/typical way of speaking to another person. BUT, you take the information provided via "typical" talk, and have a more in depth perspective on it, and that's how you can show your uniqueness and build rapport in a linear(ordinary) fashion. I used to instantly jump to philosophical discussions, in depth shit about psychology a few minutes after the conversation start.

Although someone who does this I PERSONALLY would find interesting, doing this to most people, especially girls who aren't typically so analytical will quickly get lost and bored because they have no personal relation to whatever you're saying. By having typical fluff talk, you can use THEIR examples for interesting discussions, so it's no longer "wow i feel like i'm in a classroom learning about something i'll never use" POSSIBLY to "wow i never thought about it like that, that's so interesting!" because they can RELATE to it.

I feel i can easily pick up on things if someones goes off on an abstract/non related tangent.....but MOST people can't. So keeping things in a more simple form can better your chances of a rapport enhancing/interesting/unique conversation.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:47 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:28 pm
Posts: 776
Location: D.C., U.S.A.
Please remind me if i have ever said any of the following:

Don't Push/Pull
Don't Disqualify
Don't have fun in conversations

Remind me, please if i have argued any of that in my post(s). Remind anyone here that has ever took the time to get to know me if I have ever said or enforced these principles.

All i was simply saying was convey a message to her, always. It's in important part of PU and is carried in a lot of other techniques, besides MM. (Gunwitch, SS, Juggler Method)

You can flirt, have fun, have interesting topics while conveying a message.
Note that messages aren't always fucking flat out said "I want you to fall in love with me". It is subtle, and you are opening her mind up to the idea of it possibly happening by her getting use to these ideas. The more open the mind is to it, the more likely it is going to happen. Zip also has the 'shot technique' as well as Juggler's SOI method that is very direct and works very effectively after rapport is set in. Note that rapport is crucial in order for anything to work.

Push/Pull is not the only way to generate attraction.

Fractionation is also very important to hooking a woman to you emotionally and literally mindfucking them. This also takes place after rapport.



I am flattered that you have found success with women within your MM-bubble, but before you do bash ideas of other method's of PU, please broaden yourself to other ideas of success.



I am also sorry that you had to crap on my post.

_________________
I'm addicted to facing my fears.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:05 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:42 pm
Posts: 109
Quote:
Please remind me if i have ever said any of the following:

Don't Push/Pull
Don't Disqualify
Don't have fun in conversations

Remind me, please if i have argued any of that in my post(s). Remind anyone here that has ever took the time to get to know me if I have ever said or enforced these principles.

All i was simply saying was convey a message to her, always. It's in important part of PU and is carried in a lot of other techniques, besides MM. (Gunwitch, SS, Juggler Method)

You can flirt, have fun, have interesting topics while conveying a message.
Note that messages aren't always fucking flat out said "I want you to fall in love with me". It is subtle, and you are opening her mind up to the idea of it possibly happening by her getting use to these ideas. The more open the mind is to it, the more likely it is going to happen. Zip also has the 'shot technique' as well as Juggler's SOI method that is very direct and works very effectively after rapport is set in. Note that rapport is crucial in order for anything to work.

Push/Pull is not the only way to generate attraction.

Fractionation is also very important to hooking a woman to you emotionally and literally mindfucking them. This also takes place after rapport.



I am flattered that you have found success with women within your MM-bubble, but before you do bash ideas of other method's of PU, please broaden yourself to other ideas of success.



I am also sorry that you had to crap on my post.
Beschatten,
For the benefit of the community, I think its best not to get personal with our posts.

In my replies, I never attempt to comment on the character of the poster. Instead, I will comment, agree, or disagree with the posts' content only.

Therefore to respond with personal statements (MM bubble etc.) is not conducive to what we are trying to do here. We are all on the same team man.

That being said, the style reccomended in your original post seemed misguided and not effective. Not to say it isnt ; I've never seen you in the field.

The importance of having a message behind your words is crucial. It is very a fundamental concept. I simply disagreed that the message should be a) consistent and b) constant.

If you felt an affront by my post, feel free to PM me. I'm sure we can find some common ground. I prefer not to waste the time of the other forum members with personal squabbles.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:08 am 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 4:41 pm
Posts: 18
cant you use push/pull and disqualifying and other useful tools, calibrated right, in the underlying message you are conveying in conversation?
like combining the message and the tool?

like instead of busting out canned negs or disqualifyers or push pull.....can't you imply such in the conversation you are having? like finding ways to relate the tools you want to use for the specific moment or specific conversation you are having?

like the other night i was sarcastically talking about how offended i was that they named this bar after a part of the female anatomy.......the bar is called "snatch"..... she says, "whats a snatch?" so i replied with "you don't get out much do you?" which is kind of a tease/neg and worked really well in pumping buying temperature and it acted as callback humor for later on when i just looked at my buddy and thumbed towards her that "this chick doesn't know what a snatch is"...... laughs all around and spikes on the emotional cardiogram......

so whats the message? "you are stupid" or however you want to put it....
the message is the disqualifyer/neg itself.
as it can be any other pua tool in the book. it's just learning to bridge and steer the conversation towards what it needs and acts as masking any kind of "pick up vibe" you might be putting off.....


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:28 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:19 am
Posts: 5903
Website: http://seductiveintrovert.com
The Alpha Male speaks because he has something to say
The Beta Male speaks because he has to say something
...I don't mean "BetaMale" the user.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:29 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:28 pm
Posts: 776
Location: D.C., U.S.A.
Beta male:

A proper SOI does three things:
1. It gets her thinking about sex with you.
2. It let's her see that you are bold and candid enough to take her all
the way.
3. It tells you if you have done a good enough job in the attraction
phase of your seduction.
Quote:
IMHO
At some point you are going to have to SOI. If you try to take her
clothes off, that is an SOI. You may be trying to avoid all risk until
the last moment. I'm sure you have had success with setting the mood,
kinoing the girls and then building it up into sex. That can work. But
your life will get much easier if you can figure out how to incorporate
SOI into your game.
Remember that SOIs are delivered ONLY after she is demonstrating that
she is interested. Or, if you were using my system, after you had
forced IOIs.
The difference between an SOI and a close is that the SOI talks about
what you are going to do with her. The close is simply the accounting
details of making it happen - numbers or driving situations, etc. The
close should be almost an after thought.
For a better understanding of an SOI let's look at the approach. You
can call the approach a type of SOI. The mere fact that you are coming
to talk to her is letting her know you are interested. That is why you
can not sneak in. Guys continually come up with gimmicks to try to get
in risk-free. Problem is, a hot girl has been hit on since she was
thirteen. She can see this coming a mile away. She may or may not shoot
such a guy down, she may even talk with him for awhile but she will not
respond to him like she does a confident guy who comes in unafraid of a
risk. Girls don't understand a lot about what really works on them but
they are right when they say they want a bold confident man.
Demonstrate this to her. And ironically, if you come in arrogantly
exposed to fire you will be less likely to be shot.
Well an SOI works similarly. You demonstrate you are unafraid to tell
her straight out what you can do for her sexually. Most guys don't do
that. They are timid. They try to sneak her into bed. They hope that
rapport or kino will be enough. Well some times it is, but many times
it is not - you have to put the picture in her mind.
You have to get over the avoidance of risk. Instead court risk. She
needs to see that you can work around her anti-slut protocol. She WANTS
to have sex with you.
You feel that her saying NO is a bad precedent. I understand where you
are coming from. But remember that the mind can not hold a negative
thought. If I tell you to not imagine a Volkswagon beetle, you can not
help but imagine a funny bug looking car. As far as her imagination,
her NO is not anywhere near as powerful as your suggestive SOI.
Also, you are presuming that you are creating a NO. The fact is that
the NO is there right from the beginning. You just can't see it. That
is where many guys get in trouble. They have done a good job of
attracting her. Now they hope the work is over and try to extract her.
But they never did what was necessary to find out if they had attracted
her enough.
But if you are still wanting to avoid NOs then do the other things I
suggested and don't give her the chance by either doing a take away or
talking past the objection
[/quote]

_________________
I'm addicted to facing my fears.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link