This seems to be what is described as a 'bricolage'

A bricolage is essentially a hodge-podge definition which appears to involve ideal type [a definition that although contains very specific criterion, does not particularly convey 100% any of the subjects it takes into account]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_type

A bricolage seems to be a putting together of these Ideal Types in a loose manner so that each subgroup retains its identity, but the sub-groups themselves for a collective identity.

In this case, the rating scale seems to be largely based on three things - a woman's clothing, their looks, and their personality. Other things obviously like scent or taste or experience would play a role in this, but they appear to play a minor role in comparison to the major thee listed above.

Now this being said that it is a bricolage - the three major components - looks, dress, personality - although independent in and of themselves, strongly influence the other two - almost in a two way triangle

Therefore

Looks
// \\
// \\
// \\
// \\
Personality ======= Dress [it's supposed to looks like a triangle but it didn't work out - you get the idea though

Now a woman can be generally rated on these three things, which is why I would approve of a 30 point scale, since each can be divided into a more concise scale by making each category worth 10 points.

For example:

a woman with a shitty personality - say 4
with a hot body.......................... - say 8
and a mediocre dress................. - say 6

Would rank as 18/30. Translating this inot a percentage scale could also provide useful. This particular woman would rate at 60%. Now keep in mind that 33.3% of this is the dress, 22.3% is based on personality, and the remaining 44.4% is from her looks alone. So to figure it out - what do you enjoy more - a hot bitch with a shitty personality or a nice girl with an ugly body - or a girl who can dress herself well after she's done banging you?

The 30 Point system could allow for a +/- factor of say 3 points for things that are not explicitly accounted for on this scale, say for example she's wearing a tank top with her nipples sticking out. You could put and extra point on her looks column. If she's wearing an old beat up tanker - take one off the dress. Other things include points for extra assets such as nice juggs, intoxicating scent, or whatever else you fancy [pretty feet for you fetishers out there ]

And so this gives a bit of customization to the scale - to account for personal interests. Some people like big girls [not my thing but w/e not my choice and therefore not my problem. However I make sure this does not exceed 3 points nor do I let more than one point into a given section.


Let me know what you think!

Charlie

I don't really use the 1-10 scale anymore... 0? didn't know such a beast existed, i thought that was only in tales of horror

anyway i first switched to the "binary system" which is "i'd fuck her" / "i wouldn't fuck her"
then i realized this isn't completely accurate as there is some gray area around the line where those two categories meet. so now there is a third category I call OIID (Only If I'm Drunk)

Now, a girl in my opinion can add 2 points on the 1-10 scale via clothes, make-up, hairstyle, push-up bras, etc.
So by my system an OIID can do herself up and move in to the "i'd fuck her" category.
And I suppose its possible for a "i wouldn't fuck her" girl to move up to OIID status, but in practice I've never seen this

you should rate them by how they look, cause your ranking them before you approach them.

But yes i know what you mean, ppl are like hb9! and u see a pic and she's a 7.

Technically, HB10 should be flawless, like model gorgeous.
Then work your way down from there.

_________________
--Brad