What do you think of the accuracy of this chart?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 12:59 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:34 pm
Posts: 431
Website: http://www.icanmakeyousexy.com
AOL: Nizzle3641
Location: Massachusetts
We all obviously have different views on rating the physical attractiveness of women.

This is a HotorNot.com composite chart from Wikipedia; what does everyone think of this chart in terms of accuracy?

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 4:23 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:54 am
Posts: 223
First of all, you have to see more than a girl's face to rate her. Secondly, I think the ratings are pretty generous. Maybe it's just me...I've been told I'm a tough critic.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:03 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:21 am
Posts: 284
Location: Australia
i agree with castnett. you need to see more than the head. plus fromt he head i dnt recon the 9.5-10 head is that awesome. i wonder if the chick started at 0 and was photoshoped to 10 or the otherway around


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:15 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 3:28 pm
Posts: 776
Location: D.C., U.S.A.
is it just me or does the 9.0-9.4 look better than the 9.5-10?

_________________
I'm addicted to facing my fears.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:01 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:34 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Australia
Quote:
is it just me or does the 9.0-9.4 look better than the 9.5-10?
Its just you, the 9.5-10 is gorgeous.. wtf is wrong with you??

^ that is an example about why this chart is garbage.. you cant rate all women on a general scale, its allll interpretation. Some men find certain things attractive that others dont.

_________________
'Oh my, you sir are the Moriarty of self awareness and personnal refelection'

What a title!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:14 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:53 pm
Posts: 57
need to see the bodies to rate a girl... and also pictures dont do most girls justice they either make the girl look better or worse than in real life. Also everyone has different opinions and ratings so it doesnt matter what rating you give her someone else will see her as a different one.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 9:37 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:34 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Australia
argh, CLEARLY its not talking about the whole body. The chart is of girls faces, it is rating them in attractivness based on faces..

ie.. This face would be a 9 etc..

If it was a page full of bodies youd complain you couldnt see faces, take the chart for what it is and stop bitching.

_________________
'Oh my, you sir are the Moriarty of self awareness and personnal refelection'

What a title!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 9:39 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:04 pm
Posts: 4238
Well, I agree, the 10 is definately not a 10! Thats a 6-7 I would say! And I wanna see the body! The 1 is not a 1 either... Thats a scale from 4-7!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:36 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:34 pm
Posts: 431
Website: http://www.icanmakeyousexy.com
AOL: Nizzle3641
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Well, I agree, the 10 is definately not a 10! Thats a 6-7 I would say...the 1 is not a 1 either... Thats a scale from 4-7!
That's what I was thinking and I wanted to see if it was just me!

- Chris 8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:03 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
Posts: 172
chart sucks, they should have used different girls who were naturally at the rating. photoshop can only do so much and although the 9.5 - 10 pic is the hottest, she's not a 9.5 - 10 IMO, maybe if she had a killer body but since we can't see that no dice.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:17 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:55 pm
Posts: 280
Location: South Mississippi
Sorry, but that 10 is my 7. I think that it may be accurate for the average person who isn't as shallow as me. 8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 12:22 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:09 pm
Posts: 79
It's all subjective, anyhow. What's more, I have found that a woman's personality does have a lot to do with how attractive I find them. For example, I have known women who, at first I was highly attracted to them. After a while, I grew tired and bored due to her lack of personality, and my opinion of them lessened. The opposite has also happened. I have known girls who I was not immediately interested in romantically. Then, after getting to know them and finding out that they are interesting, find myself thinking them more attractive.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link