Quote:
Just because Daoism is and remains a Chinese based religion, doesn't mean others don't pick it up brother. I have met Daoists and Daoist monks from all sorts of walks of life. And yes they have used the phrase in conversation. The Daoist way of life is extremely eclectic, and just because most may not use it, does not mean that ALL do not.
Naturally, anyone can say anything they like. A Christian, Muslim, or Branch Davidian may also use the word 'Namaste'. The point is that the term carries no particular significance within the Daoist religion.
Quote:
I should fix it? Says who?
Says Jimmy Wales and the other proponents of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is built by individual contributors. Of course, no one is compelling you to, but it is the nice thing to do, and I would imagine that I would want to correct an error if I saw it...give little back to the world.
Quote:
While Wikipedia has been proven to be correct in any number of "studies" it has also been shown to been maliciously edited by outside interests in a rather large number of subjects. Like I said, don't RELY on it. I never said don't USE it.
Reliability is a necessary condition for accuracy. If you are to concede that the studies have show it to be accurate, if follows that you also accept Wikipedia as reliable. And since we assume that we can rely on something that is reliable, I don't see what the beef is.
Also, I'm not sure why you used scare quotes around the word "studies". You realize that
Nature is arguably the most prestigious academic journal in the world right? Those conclusions have also been verified elsewhere.