Quote:
Thanks for the comments.
I don't know how this forum works. I'll assume that you both have a vast amount of experience since your moderators. I'm curious what's not real about cognitive biases? You don't believe Charlie Munger knows what he's talking about... Besides him you have PHDs whom have written books on the subject. Check out thinking Fast and slow.
Also this technique was adapted from a staple negotiation technique. People who've studied negotiations would have recognized the core concepts in this immediately.
Marketing is different from sales, which is also different from negotiating. 3 separate fields. I'm only explaining this because I get the feeling from the posts here that you guys simply don't know. Not trying to come off as a know it all or anything, and if you're interested in sales and marketing you should also learn negotiating.
As far as difficulty I believe it ranks marketing - sales - negotiating. Marketing give you general overarching principles, sales gets into a few specifics on pushing an idea, negotiation gets into deep specifics on reaching mutually agreed upon conclusions.
So if you say MM is simply marketing and sales then this is far beyond that.
So on to your point about developing skills vs using techniques. You seem to think that there is some difference?
I'm guessing your talking about developing your natural skills in each of those fields by winging it and finding out what works and what doesn't. Which is what techniques are, things tested out that are proven to work...
So why not get efficient with using the known techniques in each of those categories and improve upon them with your own twists? That seems like a better use of time and a faster way to reach higher skill levels.
I talked to one guy on here about that already. The analogy I used was learning how to box.
What you suggest is to give the guy a few general principles like: move your feet, keep your hands up, try to hit him without getting hit. And then send him into a professional ring. After he fights 50 matches eventually he should learn how not to get his ass kicked.
Vs.
Teaching a guy a jab (technique), a cross (technique), head movement (technique), how to move in the ring (technique), how to throw a counter punch (technique). Then letting him practice those techniques through drills. Then letting him spar. Then putting him in the ring.
The difference is obvious right?
This technique causes the woman to be more inclined to move towards the position you want, and like you and the idea more. That's comfort I suppose, but you can't really fit it into a box of the current pick-up technique paradigm.
This isn't like an nlp where you try to implant thoughts or whatever. She comes to this belief herself before you solidify it.
Now, poeticlyskuac this technique isn't rigid at all. You actually only use it once in the entire interaction. So what are you doing the rest of the time? Whatever you like. It just enhances everything else.
By the way a disclaimer to you impressionable readers. No technique works 100% of the time. I thought that went without saying, but I'm getting the feeling from the posts here that people think that that's what I'm claiming.
You have no idea what I suggest. I'm very detail orientated, body language is one of my passions and I've studied it down to microexpressions and microgestures... little movements most people miss. I'm one of the most detail orientated people here. Do you pay attention to a woman's wrist? Which way her feet are pointing? How she smiles? How her behavior changes? I pay attention to things most guys dismiss. I am constantly pushing myself to learn and become more, because that's what's best FOR ME and ultimately that's what's best for everyone here... experience is the best teacher it's where we learn the most about ourselves and our skills. Things like this... they're just not that valuable or important if you already have natural sexual skills.
I suggest teaching a guy to have proper form first (personal development), make sure you can develop each skill.. and focus on it. That means yes reading books, asking questions, learning through experience (The most important aspect), journaling, and monitoring and tracking progress including how each skill is developed from your approach, to your conversation skills, to how you escalate to anything else involved. I believe in immense amount of effort for improvement through learning and experience, there is not substitute for it. So stop putting it off and just do it.
Your sitting here trying to tell guys to use "The Power of Affirmation" which as I stated can guide a woman's behavior but it's more important first to be a master conversationalist... a master sexual tension builder, a sexual master, a approach master, if you got all that... bro... One of those tactics won't even come close with just the guy YOU are. And that is what I'm saying.
The road to being amazing with women or at anything for that matter requires hours of immense effort and DELIBERATE PRACTICE. People need to be more worried with approaching women and having conversations in a natural and fluent manner where it's the right mix more than they need to worry about this. Sure perhaps you can add it but imho it's a overrated. It can slightly influence a woman's behavior, but no more than simply learning to turn her on, learn to make her ok with being open with her sexuality, learn to be better with women. I see this as a waste of time when learning to be more sexual should be every guys goal.
_________________
Just another guy from back in the day.
Blogging again living life:
http://www.Scienceofnaturalgame.com