Gambler's Method, Mr. Comfort-Mid Game



Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 40
For any of you that have read and follow Gamblers "The Natural Art of Seduction"
one thing has always confused me. In describing mid game he goes on to say to connect on the hooks a girl gives you- an example would be:
Girl: I want to move to new york someday
PUA: wow you will love it there, the people are great its a fantatic vibe you really seem the sort of person who would enjoy it over there ect

however to connect on every hook like this isnt natural, im not talking in terms of natural game, but in the fact that conversations dont really work that way and after the third hook or it will just seem like you are trying to analyse her. in the book it offers little info on calibrating this technique to work more towards a two way conversation.

so what do you guys think of this? personally i see it as a means to reach the hook point and to try get her talking about herself, but even if its used purely for this it leaves you in open water in terms of conversation

Cheers for reading guys


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:03 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 3:17 am
Posts: 78
Quote:
For any of you that have read and follow Gamblers "The Natural Art of Seduction"
one thing has always confused me. In describing mid game he goes on to say to connect on the hooks a girl gives you- an example would be:
Girl: I want to move to new york someday
PUA: wow you will love it there, the people are great its a fantatic vibe you really seem the sort of person who would enjoy it over there ect

however to connect on every hook like this isnt natural, im not talking in terms of natural game, but in the fact that conversations dont really work that way and after the third hook or it will just seem like you are trying to analyse her. in the book it offers little info on calibrating this technique to work more towards a two way conversation.

so what do you guys think of this? personally i see it as a means to reach the hook point and to try get her talking about herself, but even if its used purely for this it leaves you in open water in terms of conversation

Cheers for reading guys
I have read this book and I love this type of game. I would love to go to New York is a great hook. You could say, I heard there are great places to shop at out there. What kind of places do like to shop at? If there was one item you would shop for in New York, what would it be? These types of questions are friendly and non-intrusive and dont make it look like your analyzing her. Then talk about what you would do if you went to New York.

Practice this with friends and co-workers. There are always hook points. You just need to look for them.

I talked to my manager this morning about my kids moving back to TX, then we talked about the travel, because he has traveled to India, and then we talked about driving. And bad drivers. I was practicing finding hook points to continue a converstation.

This kind of comes naturally to me due to the fact I used to be hardcore into hip hop and freestyle battle. I had freestyled a lot back in the days so this part of natural game I got down.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link