Female relationship science is creative, but nonsense



Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 16 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:48 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 692
Location: LA, California
I had a an argument with a guy who only pays attention to what women think and say. He told me that in order to find out what women want, you have to ask them since it's "That simple." He said, "If you go to Hungary, don't you need to speak the language to survive? Same thing applies to women." I told him that we simply aren't meant to understand women because we're men. It makes perfect sense comparing a logical example to women and yes, with a lot of thinking you CAN make oranges and sharks be alike.

So I decided to start reading up on what the female experts had to say pertaining to relationships and whatnot. I came across an 80+ page article about 5 types of men: cerebrals, thoracics, muscle workers, fat men, and skinny men. This was all written by women.

I read through all of them and I gotta say, female experts write in a more complex manner. I came to the conclusion that they are geniuses, they really do have beautiful minds. But all that intellect and information is mental masturbation, it's a sort of fantasy thinking that doesn't apply to reality. At the end of the day you're still thinking, "WHAT?"

Here's an example. The "cerebrals" as described by women are those men with big heads who are incredibly smart but they're always poor and don't care about apparel. In a section it mentioned how women are attracted to these type of men because it puts them in a "motherly state" since they're so fragile. Once again, beautiful thinking but what the? That's just a bunch of psychological framing (stereotypes, movies, etc.) Fat people are jolly and happy, muscular people walk heavy, skinny people walk mechanically, and the thoracics (people with a high chest) have the best walk.

Here's another thing. Another article was about a different set of "men-types". One type was called "The knight in shining armor". He was described as being the type of guy who always likes to solve a girl's issues and be her hero. However, this is just so he can't look at his own problems and these types of men usually date women with lots of problems. Makes perfect sense, but it's bogus. This is why a lot of advice out there is dangerous. People can make anything sound right. I've read a lot from what men wrote and even there you find a bunch of bogus "sounding right."

Remember the movie What Women Want with Mel Gibson? After he could start hearing their thoughts, he was going mentally insane. That's how it was when I only visited websites with women speaking their minds and reading their books. So good old Mel Gibson began to do everything "right" after being able to read their thoughts. However at one point in the movie, a woman said to him, "I don't know what's wrong with you! You can read my thoughts, you know what I want every time, are you gay?" He said, "Yes, I'm as gay as they come." So even I came to the conclusion that we just aren't meant to think like women. It turns out that Mel Gibson's failures with women even though he was a casanova was due to a simple lack of understanding basic social conduct. He was sarcastic and cocky only to cover up an insecurity.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link