Quote:
This is a little offtopic but.... at least it's fun debating about this stuff:)
I wasnt talking about pet analogy. You misunderstood me totaly.
I'm not a fucking hitler:)
And I'm not a control freak or anything like that. Or totaly insensitive egoistic selfish dictator like some thinks that I am ahahahahahahaha
I was talking about being a selector and being a guy who gets what he wants.
If you look at the 90% of relationships that work. (healthy relationships) You'll see that one of the partners is dominanat. So he/she has the last word.
So why wouldnt you be that guy.
I'm always doing 50:50 with girls. And I always give EXACTLY THE SAME amount of energy/time/money as she gives me. So it's always fair. No exploitation or whatever negative things you were thinking about. So I'm her pet as she is mine.
BUT!!! I dont make compromises with most of the things. If she isnt willing to put as much energy in me as I want her to...she's gone.
If she isnt fucking as good as I want her to.....she is gone.
If she isnt as smart as I want her to....she's gone.
I'm the selector not her. And the stronger frame always wins.
About the second point...I know 10's are pleasant people... I'm dating one.
I was talking about when you first met them.
Maybe scotland is so cool that 10's are nice but in most of the world they arent at least until you break up that bitch shield.
If that would be so, AFC would be dating 10's all the time.
I actually highly doubt you're dating anyone at all purely on the grounds that you believe in "Bitch Shields".
Then again I could always be completely wrong.
---------
However you are mis-reading what it is to have a leading role in a relationship and confusing that with a "Domination" of the spouse.
Becuase one person may be leading most of the time, does not mean the other persons values and wishes are neglected.
For instance Jill may decide often where they are going to eat when Jill and John go out. BUT if John pipes up and says, "no I really cannot stand Thai food tonight, I would love some Indian however"... Jill says, "ok cool".
"A loser will demand that people follow his lead or he will stop being their friend; a leader starts walking, and people just follow"
You will often get one person more vocal and deciding in a relationship and this is the person who leads.
However leading and controlling are different things. A leader in a social context ONLY has authority as long as people want to listen to him/her. Leaders in a social enviroment such as in a bar, or a circle of friends, or a relationship, lead, they lead becuase they make a suggestion and most of the time people follow, but they have NO authority or dominion over the people they lead.
And the selector metaphor is bullshit. Becuase it completely fails to take into account the actual complexities in the dating world.
Whats wrong with, being the seller? Selling the product that everyone wants?

The metaphore itself is confusing and the mindset it portrays is skewed. You could be a selector buying a product, or a seller, selling an awesome product.
Assuming you can have any girl in the club is silly at best and I will happily laugh at any man who believes this becuase in my experience they are never even close to that guy.
It's an equal trade-off, you are both selectors the fact that you had to talk to her and interact, rather than have her just charging at your cock shows that it isn't the case that you chose her and that was the end of it.
Rather you wanted her, so you chose her to approach, you did so, demonstrated why she should also choose you and then she became reasonably convinced and selected you aswell.
It was and still is a mutual process of selection.
As for the initial bitchyness...
Sweden, Hungary, Germany, England, Ireland and Scotland, along with meeting an American girl here, two Italian girls upstairs from me who are absoloute cutie pies

and a Norwegian. These are the cultures in which I have sarged and a sample of the people with which I hang out.
The "scotland is topsy turvey"; was irony.
It's been about 10 Months since I last experienced Bitch Shields on any sort of regular basis.
Two things that changed in that time were; I had started to understand people better, and my game had improved.
Having a girl being critical of you the second you stick your head in is NOT NORMAL by any standards.
Even if attractive women were as snobbish as you think they are, to rudely reject anyone who approaches them in a less than excellent manner. It wouldn't make sense, it's just not profitable for those girls and they know this.
Attractive girls are some of the best socialised women around, on top of that they have spent ages doing themselves up to look good. To long in fact for them to be percieved as horrible bitches becuase they didn't have the control to say "sorry I have to go" rather than "Fuck off".
It doesn't make sense! Hell I was talking to a Serbian girl last week and she was describing to me how embarresed she was when another girl she was out with started getting bitchy with a guy who was hitting on her.
Most women and attractive ones especially, are far too well socialised to see "Fuck off" as a good option for turning down suitors.
----------------------------------
Outside of that does anyone else have something to add to the OP?