Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
| Author | Message |
| d.penguin | PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:14 pm | |
| Offline | | New to MPUA Forum | Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:29 am Posts: 6 | | i have decided to take a different approach to learning pu. was wondering what thoughts you guys had on this...
i wish to be fairly natural and really do not want to use canned material.. i do not want to use opinion openers because frankly the feel and sound unnatural and well... creepy... instead i am going to go out with knowledge of all the theory and try to incorporate that into my game rather than writing a script to do so...
i have already opened heaps of sets,, (i do have testies)
reached a hook point various times
and incorporated basic ideas like negs and compliance tests...
so what do you guys think.. is this silly to try and make myself a hybrid natural/theory based pua??
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Dangerboy | PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:28 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Addict |  | Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:24 am Posts: 255 | | I'm not much of a fan of rountines and lines, but I do suggest that you learn a few just to fall back on in case conversation runs dry.
As for the theory, in order to really be good at anything, you need to know both the HOW and the WHY. So definitely study theory.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Jav | PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:32 pm | |
| Offline | | PUA Forum Leader |  | Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:59 pm Posts: 1929 Location: the moon | | On a very basic level natural and stacking game (mm method) are very much alike.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|