Hi guys.
I was reading this book. It is a very good source for seduction. I loved most of it. But there is something confusing.
Quote:
There are two ways to prove yourself. First, the spontaneous action: a
situation arises in which the target needs help, a problem needs solving, or,
simply, he or she needs a favor. You cannot foresee these situations, but you
must be ready for them, for they can spring up at any time. Impress the target by going further than really necessary sacrificing more money, more
time, more effort than they had expected. Your target will often use these moments, or even manufacture them, as a kind of test: will you retreat? Or
will you rise to the occasion? You cannot hesitate or flinch, even for a moment, or all is lost. If necessary, make the deed seem to have cost you more
than it has, never with words, but indirectly exhausted looks, reports
spread through a third party, whatever it takes.
The second way to prove yourself is the brave deed that you plan and
execute in advance, on your own and at the right moment preferably
some way into the seduction, when any doubts the victim still has about
you are more dangerous than earlier on. Choose a dramatic, difficult action
that reveals the painful time and effort involved. Danger can be extremely
seductive. Cleverly lead your victim into a crisis, a moment of danger, or
indirectly put them in an uncomfortable position, and you can play the rescuer, the gallant knight. The powerful feelings and emotions this elicits can
easily be redirected into love.
(The Art Of Seduction - pg: 324)
Isn't it something reverse what we learnt in comminity? Which way is true? What do you think about it?
CHAT
She still offen reminds me that day