Do girls judge you in thirty seconds?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » General Questions




Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 53
Heard someone saying that girls can tell whether they would sleep with you within thirty seconds.
This could be complete bull, so I want to know people's opinions on it and how much they agree with it. I've seen no scientific proof for it, someone simply said they heard it and told me.
Personally I don't like it at all, as to me it makes game seem more redundant.
I expect some people to say that the statement is a load of shit, but I don't care, I've been thinking about it a lot and want to know others thoughts.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2013 4:59 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:46 pm
Posts: 880
Location: Newcastle
If you're going by looks only then that may be true as attraction in the physical sense isn't a choice but (allegedly) girls only base 20% of attraction on looks (us guys it's 80%, we're just looking for healthy genes) The purpose of PUA is to improve the other 80% with DHV's and knowledge of women's attraction protocol psychology.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 214
Absolutely true.

You don't even need to talk to them for them to think of you as "a guy I want to fuck."

They can come to the same conclusion just looking at you, or watching you interact with other people.

They just as quickly categorize you as "a guy I want to fuck," as "a guy that would be a good boyfriend" or "a guy who creeps me the fuck out."

All PUA is about IMO is knowing how to get yourself slotted into the first category.

_________________
For my unfiltered rants on Game and Gender Dynamics, check out "The Mask And Rose:"
http://themaskandrose.wordpress.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 12:07 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 53
But then does that not make all of the game's theories and methods after the social proof, completely useless in a sense? Like going back to before the game was around and girls simply selected who they wanted and there was no learning to seduction?
I cant help but think people like style, like small geeks, were ever seen as potential suitors for having sex with five women at a time. Especially women coming to that conclusion within thirty seconds?
If it is true it makes me less confident about using all these game tactics.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 1:07 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 214
Yes. Most of the stuff around here is bullshit. If you focus on showing girls why they should want to fuck you, letting them know you like them too and then making it easy for her to hook up with you, you'll be way ahead of the curve. everything we learn, ultimately is designed to help you do just that.

_________________
For my unfiltered rants on Game and Gender Dynamics, check out "The Mask And Rose:"
http://themaskandrose.wordpress.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 1:23 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 2:31 pm
Posts: 81
Quote:
Absolutely true.

You don't even need to talk to them for them to think of you as "a guy I want to fuck."

They can come to the same conclusion just looking at you, or watching you interact with other people.

They just as quickly categorize you as "a guy I want to fuck," as "a guy that would be a good boyfriend" or "a guy who creeps me the fuck out."

All PUA is about IMO is knowing how to get yourself slotted into the first category.
those in category 2 also get das booty, just sayin'


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 4:20 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 214
Yeah, but on her terms, because now they're probably in a monogamous relationship.

Unless he was just putting that act on in order to get laid, thus making him a liar who hurts women.

Always, always better to be Guy 3. You can have a relationship if you want later on, on YOUR terms.

_________________
For my unfiltered rants on Game and Gender Dynamics, check out "The Mask And Rose:"
http://themaskandrose.wordpress.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 6:05 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 835
Location: American Southeast
In club and bar like environments it seems like there are only 2 categories.

1. Fuck
2. OMG CREEP!

I think that appearance matters more than looks do, in the sense that how you present yourself matters more than the genetics.

The 30 second rule is true by my experience, I don't feel that there really is an inbetween.

_________________
I just come on here these days to give advice and read interesting threads. Gone are the days when I came to seek advice and validation.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 6:49 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:34 pm
Posts: 3993
Nope, not true at all. They may feel a physical attraction, but guys often blow themselves out with what they say or how they behave within seconds.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 7:03 am 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
This isn't an absolute true or false rule. You can look at it as a gradient representing the female screening mechanism for a sexual partner.

Here are the nonverbal cues (not exactly 30 seconds) in the first 4 minutes of your first time interaction with a woman.
  • 1. You will catch her looking at you. When you do, hold her gaze. Look directly into the pupils of her eyes until she looks down. She will check out your shoes if those are clean, get a quick glance at your crotch area, and then look back into your eyes again.

    2. She will smile. Bait her to talk. Turn around and show your butt. She will unconsciously check your butt to see if you're good in bed. Engage her in the interaction for a few seconds.

    3. She will touch you. If she rubs your chest or pinches your belly, her horniness is through the roof. If she taps or play punches your arm, you're slotted as boyfriend material.
Those 3 sets of cues are nothing if you fail to escalate properly through the f-close. If you fail in your escalation, you will be slotted as a friend that she wanted to fuck the first time she laid her eyes on you but she no longer wants to fuck.

:twisted:

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 214
Here's my argument for "it happens in 30 seconds at most:"

Have you ever played that game "Fuck, Marry, Kill" with a female friend?

Yeah?

How long did it take her to answer?

_________________
For my unfiltered rants on Game and Gender Dynamics, check out "The Mask And Rose:"
http://themaskandrose.wordpress.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2013 11:48 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 53
Quote:
Here's my argument for "it happens in 30 seconds at most:"

Have you ever played that game "Fuck, Marry, Kill" with a female friend?

Yeah?

How long did it take her to answer?

That is genuinely the worst proof for an argument. That can show that people make a decision quickly without being a retard. If they did the game with strangers, there answers would change a lot once they got to know the person potentially.
I don't have understand why you're a member of this site if you basically think there's no game required at all? Surely people like style prove that game has something to do with it.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2013 12:02 am 
Offline
Ask a mod for a custom title

Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:34 pm
Posts: 3993
Quote:
Here's my argument for "it happens in 30 seconds at most:"

Have you ever played that game "Fuck, Marry, Kill" with a female friend?

Yeah?

How long did it take her to answer?
Its a game, not real life. Your post was f*cktarded, and your point moot.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2013 1:00 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 214
A. So Fuck Marry Kill is a game, but seduction isn't a game?

B. When did I say game isn't required? Game is how your recognize girls that like you, express your interest back, and make it happen without Bursting the Bubble. 99% of bullshit about routines and approach angles and which opener is best, is just that--bullshit.

C. Cool, you guys go work on field-testing 300 different openers and never getting laid. I'm gonna go find a chick who wants to fuck me.

Peace.

_________________
For my unfiltered rants on Game and Gender Dynamics, check out "The Mask And Rose:"
http://themaskandrose.wordpress.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 7:39 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 53
I'm doing well with women. It's not about proving ourselves to random screen names we're never going to meet. What I'm saying is, is just that game really isn't proof at all. Girls can make judgement on looks. Doesn't mean they're going to stick to that decision if you demonstrate enough value and show you're charismatic. However I do agree though, that getting your head too much into superfluous details like angles is unnecessary.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link