Hey, im gonna keep this short. A girl im seeing is also seeing other guys, (im also seeing other girls but she doesnt know that). I tried to arrange meeting up with her on a certain day because im always busy. she says that she has a date. i said she should cancel as im way more fun (in a jokey and serious way). she says she cant cancel but will text me soon when she is free to meet up.

I am not sure what option to choose. i could either/and:

1) not say anything to her, and wait for her to tell me she is free and meet up with her

2) not say anything to her, wait for her to tell me she is free and say that i cant, i have a date. then offer to do something exciting with her weekend like go to the zoo.

3)one of the above and try and tool the guy through her via text. maybe make him seem boring, or overhype the guy to make him crash when they go out.

my goal is obviously to see this girl exclusivly.

Any examples of text messages with option 3 would be great.

Im also interested in any other options

cheers

fixxed it for you op, go with 1)

Yep, Pimpleton is right.

Your original option 1 only lets her know you're being reactive. Your response is ego-driven ("you rejected my proposal to hangout, now I'll do the same to you!" - which looks very childish). MOST women are fairly intuitive with this knowing that the guy is trying to spite her. Doing this only makes you look reactive and an inability to hold the frame as a confidant, cool, non-reactive guy (the kind chicks dig).

Option 2 looks like you're pouting.

Option 3 is just str8 retarded. Never tool another guy, it only makes you look like the tool. The bigger man knows what battles are worth fighting and which ones aren't.

Remember, she owes nothing to you, you owe nothing to her. Instead of allowing your ego to dictate your actions, simply be responsive the next time she touches base and get her out. If she flakes, as Pumple suggested, move onto the next.